UNHCR passes series of anti-Israel resolutions; US opposes
Israel blasts ‘unfit’ lawyer tapped to head UN probe into treatment of Palestinians
Last year Francesca Albanese said she
hesitated to take on a project about Palestinian refugees as her ‘deeply
held personal views could compromise [her] objectivity’
Israel on Friday formally sounded its objection to the recent
appointment of an Italian lawyer to head the UN Human Rights Council’s
open-ended investigation into Israel’s treatment of Palestinians,
arguing that she harbors significant bias against the Jewish state.
Merav Marks, legal adviser for the Israeli mission to the UN in
Geneva, said during the closing session of the Human Rights Council that
Francesca Albanese was “unfit” to take the role of Special Rapporteur
on Palestine.
“The newly appointed special rapporteur’s opinion expressed in
numerous articles, events and media outlets endlessly voicing
anti-Israel libel show that she is unfit to take up this role,” said
Marks.
“In fact, the special rapporteur has even expressed concerns about
her own personal views, which she said could compromise her objectivity
when addressing the situation,” she said, adding that Israel therefore
objected “in the strongest terms” to the appointment of Albanese to the
“already one-sided mandate dedicated to delegitimizing and demonizing
Israel.”
Marks appeared to be referring to an interview last year published online by the Institute for Palestine Studies, in which Albanese discussed a book on Palestinian refugees and UNWRA.
Get The Times of Israel's Daily Editionby email and never miss our top stories
Albanese said that she was initially concerned about involvement in a
new edition of the book on the grounds that “deep down perhaps I feared
that embarking on research on a matter on which I had deeply held
personal views could compromise my objectivity.”
An Israeli in her home after a rocket hit
from the Gaza Strip, in the southern city of Ashdod, on May 18, 2021.
(Avi Roccah/Flash90)
She said that she was ultimately convinced to take on the task when
she found there were “huge misconceptions” on the Palestinian refugee
issue, adding that there was a need for political solutions on the
matter.
UN Watch, a pro-Israel lobby group based in Geneva, highlighted that
last year Albanese moderated an event titled “Israeli Apartheid
Exposed,” and claimed she had not raised potential personal conflicts of
interest if she were to take on the role.
Advertisement
Israel — backed at times by the United States — has long accused the
Human Rights Council of anti-Israel bias and has generally refused to
cooperate with its investigators.
The UN commission of inquiry was denounced by Israeli leaders when it
was announced last May, shortly after the conclusion of an 11-day war
between Israel and Hamas-led fighters in Gaza.
Gazan terror groups shot thousands of rockets at Israel during the
war — which Israel dubbed Operation Guardian of the Walls — killing 12,
all but one of them civilians.
Israeli retaliatory airstrikes on targets in the Strip killed some
250 people, including 66 minors, according to the Hamas-run Health
Ministry, which does not differentiate between terror group members and
civilians.
Israel has said the majority of those killed were terror operatives
and insists it did everything to avoid civilian casualties while
fighting armed groups deeply and deliberately embedded in populated
areas.
A Palestinian woman walks past a
destroyed building in the al-Rimal commercial district in Gaza City on
May 22, 2021, following a ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian
terror groups. (Emmanuel Dunand/AFP)
Meanwhile, the 49th session of the UN Human Rights Council concluded
on Friday, with the United States voting throughout the period against a
number of resolutions singling out Israel.
Advertisement
In a statement, the State Department said that the US voted against all resolutions that “unfairly target Israel.”
Those four resolutions were: “Israeli settlements in the Occupied
Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied
Syrian Golan; Human rights in the occupied Syrian Golan; Human rights
situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East
Jerusalem, and the obligation to ensure accountability and justice;
Right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.”
Only the US, UK and Marshall Islands voted against all the resolutions.
These were the first votes on Israel since the United States rejoined
the UNHCR earlier this year, after former president Donald Trump
withdrew the US from the council over its alleged anti-Israel bias.
Seeking to justify the reversal, the current White House has argued it
was unable to influence the international dialogue on human rights
without a seat at the table.
Rockets are launched from the Gaza Strip towards Israel, on May 10, 2021. (AP Photo/Khalil Hamra)
Biden administration officials have insisted they will use the
renewed US membership to oppose one-sided measures targeting Israel and
speak out against the 125-8-34 vote to launch the open-ended probe into Israel following the war in Gaza last May.
Besides the Israel-Hamas conflict, the commission is also to
investigate “all underlying root causes of recurrent tensions,
instability, and protraction of conflict” including discrimination and
repression, according to the text.
The only way to quash the probe after the UNHCR voted to establish a
Commission of Inquiry and the UN General assembly voted to approve an
annual budget of over $4 million would be for the council to adopt a
resolution reversing the previous one — an unlikely possibility given
the overwhelming support for the initiative.