[Salon] With American History The Subject of Debate, It Is Good To Recognize Its Uniqueness
- To: "[Salon]" <salon@committeefortherepublic.org>
- Subject: [Salon] With American History The Subject of Debate, It Is Good To Recognize Its Uniqueness
- From: Chas Freeman <cwfresidence@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:31:35 -0400
- Authentication-results: mlm2.listserve.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Ow51RaZL"
- Authentication-results: semf09.mfg.siteprotect.com; iprev=pass (mail-lf1-f47.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.47; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
- Authentication-results: mfg.siteprotect.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cwfresidence@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=gmail.com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mlm2.listserve.net B308CB082E
WITH AMERICAN HISTORY THE SUBJECT OF DEBATE, IT IS GOOD TO RECOGNIZE ITS UNIQUENESS
BY
ALLAN C. BROWNFELD
————————————————————————————————————————————
In
recent days, the history of the United States, has become the subject
of widespread discussion and debate. Some have argued that this history
is deeply flawed, pointing to the existence of slavery. In 1787, when
our Constitution was adopted, slavery was legal everywhere in the world,
and was an intrinsic part of the biblical Judeo-Christian tradition.
Slavery dominated Ancient Greece and Rome. Many at the Constitutional
Convention wanted to eliminate it at the beginning, but that,
unfortunately, was not accomplished until the Civil War. Some
contemporary critics, such as the author of “The 1619 Project,” suggest
that slavery was, somehow, unique to America and even argue that the
American Revolution was fought, in part, to maintain slavery. Neither
of these ideas, as many historians have pointed out, bear any
relationship to real history.
Our
history is, indeed, complicated, as is the history of other countries.
But it is also unique. Our government is the oldest existing form of
government in the world today. Unfortunately, too few Americans
understand their own history very well. If they did, they would
recognize its essential contribution.
The
Constitution of the United States was not the first constitution ever
to have been drafted by a group of men assembled in what they themselves
called a Constitutional Convention. Between 1776 and 1780, Virginia,
Pennsylvania, Maryland, North Carolina, and Massachusetts held
constitutional conventions. Nor was the Constitution of the United
States the first explicitly formulated Constitution.
In
a treatise on Greek constitutions, Aristotle described and discussed
more than a hundred of them. But, historian Mortimer Adler tells us,
“The American Constitution created the first federal republic in the
history of the world. The first objective or aim mentioned in its
Preamble, a purpose distinctly different from all the other objectives
mentioned thereafter, is ‘to form a more perfect union.’Union of what?
Of the 13 sovereign states that, in the preceding five years, had been
United under the Articles of Confederation. A federal republic is thus
seen to involve a plurality of sovereignties…”
When
the Constitution was written, the framers could look everyplace in the
world for an example of a free society with limited government—-and find
none to follow. No existing government in 1787 was designed to provide
its people with freedom, nor had any in past history.
The
Framers set out to create something which had never been created
before—-an inherently perilous undertaking. Charles Pinckney of South
Carolina asked: “Is there, at this moment, a nation upon earth that
enjoys this right, where the true principles of representation are
understood and practiced, and where all authority flows from and returns
at stated periods to the people? I answer, there is not.”
Then
he asked what the present governments of the world were based upon, and
said: “To fraud, to force, or accident, all the governments we know
have owed their births.” Of the work being done at the Constitutional
Convention, Pinckney declared: “To the philosophical mind, how new and
awful an instance do the United States at present exhibit in the
political world! They exhibit, sir, the first instance of a people,
who, being dissatisfied with their government—-unattacked by foreign
force, and undisturbed by domestic uneasiness—-coolly and deliberately
resort to the virtue and good sense of their country, for a correction
of their public errors.”
The
achievements of the Constitutional Convention were considered miraculous
in their own day. In a letter to the Marquis de Lafayette on Feb.7,
1788, George Washington wrote, “It appears to me, then, little short of a
miracle,that the delegates from so many different states…should unite
in forming a system of national government.”
The
Framers understood that they had accomplished something unprecedented
in history. James Madison reflected that, “Is it not the glory of the
people of America that, whilst they have paid a decent regard to the
opinion of former times and other nations, they have not suffered a
blind veneration for antiquity, for custom, or for names, to overrule
the suggestions of their own good sense, the knowledge of their own
situation, and the lessons of their own experience? To this manly
spirit posterity will be indebted for the possession and the world for
the example, of the numerous innovations displayed on the American
theater in favor of private rights and public happiness.”
Madison
declared: “Happily for America, happily we trust for the whole human
race, they pursue a new and more noble course. They accomplished a
revolution which has no parallel in the annals of human society. They
reared the fabrics of governments which have no model on the face of the
globe. They formed the design of a great Confederacy, which it is
incumbent on their successors to improve and perpetuate.”
One
of the unprecedented breakthroughs which the framers included in the
Constitution was that there would be no religious test for public office
or for citizenship.
Elsewhere in the
Western world, Catholics were without rights in Protestant
countries,Protestants were without rights in Catholic countries, while
Jews had equal rights in neither.
Charles
Pinckney lamented, “How many thousands of the subjects of Great Britain
at this moment labor under civil disabilities, merely on account of
their religious persuasions! To the liberal and enlightened mind, the
rest of Europe affords a melancholy picture of the depravity of human
nature, and of the total subversion of those rights, without which we
should suppose no people could be happy or content.”
In
Pinckney’s view, “From the European world are no precedents to be drawn
for a people who think they are capable of governing themselves.
Instead of receiving instructions from them, we may, with pride, affirm
that, new as this country is in terms of settlement, inexperienced as
she must be upon questions of government, she still has read more useful
lessons to the old world, she has made them more acquainted with their
own rights, than they had been otherwise for centuries.”
Professor
Samuel Huntington points to the truly historic meaning of the
Constitutional Convention and its product: “This is a new event in the
history of mankind. Heretofore most governments have been formed by
tyrants and imposed on mankind by force. Never before did a people, in
time of peace and tranquility, meet together by their representatives
and, with calm deliberation, frame for themselves a system of
government.”
The framers of the
Constitution were under no illusion that they had written a document
which would stand the test of time without additions and changes. It is
for this reason that Article V of the Constitution sets forth the
process by which amendments could be adopted. James Madison stated that
the founders hoped their successors would “improve and perpetuate” the
Constitution.
That the Constitution has
survived for more than 230 years and enabled Americans to live in
freedom and attract to our shores men and women of every race and
religion and nation who sought liberty, is testimony to the
extraordinary achievement of the framers.
“The
framers,” said Professor Forrest McDonald, “were guided by principles
but not by formulas. They understood that no form or system of
government is universally desirable or workable; instead, if government
is to be viable , it must be made to conform to human nature and to the
genius of the people—-to their customs, morals, habits, institutions,
aspirations. The framers did just that, and thereby used old materials
to create a new order for the ages.”
Indeed,
the founding fathers were committed to building a new civilization
which would become a model for mankind. Even before the Declaration of
Independence, John Adams saw the human hope which was flowering in
America and wrote: “I always considered the settlement of America with
reverence and wonder, as the opening of a grand scene and design in
Providence for the illumination of the ignorant, and the emancipation of
the slavish part of mankind all,over the world.”
As
with all enterprises of imperfect human beings, America has many flaws
and imperfections. We have tried to correct and overcome many of these,
and have often succeeded. Other serious problems and shortcomings are
yet to be resolved. But we should recognize the uniqueness of our
history and celebrate our accomplishments as well as confront the
continuing problems we face. All too often, our history, in recent
days, has been portrayed more as a continuing dilemma than as an
achievement. This is harmful to a proper understanding of America’s
real place in history.
##
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.