[Salon] Latin America Is Back on the Grand Chessboard, As Race for Resources and Strategic Influence Intensifies in New Cold War
- To: "[Salon]" <salon@committeefortherepublic.org>
- Subject: [Salon] Latin America Is Back on the Grand Chessboard, As Race for Resources and Strategic Influence Intensifies in New Cold War
- From: Chas Freeman <cwfresidence@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:33:22 -0400
- Authentication-results: mlm2.listserve.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KuhHZFMt"
- Authentication-results: semf05.mfg.siteprotect.com; iprev=pass (mail-ed1-f46.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.208.46; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
- Authentication-results: mfg.siteprotect.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cwfresidence@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=gmail.com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mlm2.listserve.net 3E347B0853
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2022/08/latin-america-is-once-again-on-great-game board-as-new-cold-war-threatens-to-go-global.html
Latin America Is Back on the Grand Chessboard, As Race for Resources and Strategic Influence Intensifies in New Cold War
Nick Corbishley August 19, 2022
Latin
America is once again in the cross-hairs of the world’s great (but in
some cases, declining) powers as the new Cold War heats up.
Vladimir
Putin upped the ante this week in his standoff with the West by
offering Russia’s allies in Latin America, Asia and Africa advanced
Russian weaponry — all in the name of safeguarding “peace and security”
in the emerging multipolar world. Speaking at the opening ceremony of
the International Military and Technical Forum 2022 and the
International Army Games-2022, the Russian leader heaped praise on
non-aligned countries for not kowtowing to the global hegemon and
instead choosing to steer a more independent course of development:
“We
highly appreciate the fact that our country has many like-minded allies
and partners on different continents. These are the states that do not
succumb to the so-called hegemon. Their leaders show a real masculine
character and do not bend.
Putin did not name any names but when
it comes to Latin America it is not hard to decipher which countries he
is probably referring to. While there may be a growing roster of nations
in the region wishing to steer a more independent course of Washington,
three of the region’s countries already enjoy close military ties with
Russia: Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua.
By deepening those ties,
Putin puts the US on alert in its own neighborhood. As I previously
noted in “Is Russia About to Put the Monroe Doctrine to the Test?“,
Daniel Ortega’s government in Nicaragua recently renewed a long-standing
military partnership with Russia, despite repeated warnings from
Washington not to cooperate with Russia since its invasion of Ukraine.
Nicaragua now faces the prospect of a fresh round of US sanctions, after
the Ortega government shuttered radio stations belonging to the
Catholic Church and banned processions.
Further south, Venezuela
is currently hosting the Sniper Frontier competition, with
representatives from Russia, Bolivia, Abkhazia, Belarus, Uzbekistan and
Myanmar competing to win the title of the world’s best sniper. The
competition forms part of the International Army Games, an annual
Russian military sports event organized by the Ministry of Defense of
Russia (MoD). Now in its eighth year, the two-week event brings together
participants from close to 30 countries, including China, Iran,
Algeria, Syria, Sudan and Vietnam, all vying to prove which is the most
skilled in dozens of competitions.
In recent years, the US and a
number of EU Member States, including Germany, France and Austria, have
taken part as observers in the event, which is sometimes referred to as
the “War Olympics”. Suffice to say, that won’t be happening this year.
Zelensky Gives First Speech Ever in Latin America
Two
days after Putin’s speech, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky was
given his first chance to address a Latin American audience. The
videoconference was organized by the Pontifical Catholic University of
Chile and (according to its dean) was broadcast to 300 universities
around the world. During his address Zelensky urged Latin America to
abandon its position of neutrality and join global sanctions against
Russia.
“What matters to us is that Latin American countries know
the truth and share our truth with others,” Zelensky said. Asked about
what he expected from Latin American countries, the Ukrainian leader
replied: “I want them to join those policies carried out by the United
States, to make the sanctions policy more effective.”
It is a
tall order given that most countries in Latin America, including the two
largest, Brazil and Mexico, resolutely oppose sanctions, for an array
of economic, geostrategic and ethical reasons that I have outlined in
previous posts (here and here). They are also terrified, understandably,
by the precedent the U.S., EU and friends have set by attempting to
excise Russia from the global financial system. If it works, they know
they could be next.
Already around one-quarter of the global
population is already suffering the direct effects of US-led sanctions,
including Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua. In March 2020, as the COVID-19
pandemic was ripping global supply chains apart, those three countries
joined Russia, China, Syria, Iran and North Korea in signing a letter to
the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the Office of the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights and the Director-General of the World
Health Organization calling for an end to sanctions. Although UN
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres requested an immediate end to the
sanctions, nothing happened.
Snubbed Again
Chile is one of
the few countries in the region that has endorsed sanctions, albeit in
half-hearted fashion. Yet Chile’s President Gabriel Boric and its
Foreign Minister Antonia Urrejola Noguera were both conspicuously absent
from the event despite having received invites. The snub came almost
exactly a month after the South American trade bloc Mercosur refused to
host Zelensky at its 60th Summit. The US and EU have both pressured
countries in the region to join the sanctions pile-on, to no avail.
Now,
as tensions rise between the West and Russia and China and as more
independent-minded governments come to power in Latin American countries
including Mexico, Brazil, Honduras and Colombia (of all places), both
the US and EU are beginning to ratchet their response in the region. The
Commander of US Southern Command, General Laura Richardson, recently
accused China of engaging in “debt-trap diplomacy” and Russia and China
of “undermining democracy” in the region.
Beijing “doesn’t invest
in Latin America, it extracts,” Richardson said before a Senate Armed
Services Committee in March. She also recounted that in January the
Russian deputy foreign minister had said he could neither confirm nor
deny that Russia would send military assets to Cuba and Venezuela.
Senator
Ted Cruz further escalated the war of words in a blustering floor
speech on Aug 4 about Colombia’s election of its first ever left-wing
President:
I rise today to discuss the acute dangers to American
national security that have formed and are deepening across the Western
hemisphere. These dangers have coalesced, Madame President, because of
the comprehensive and catastrophic policies pursued by President Biden
and his administration. Already nine governments in South America,
Central America and the Caribbean are controlled by socialists. All of
these governments, with only one exception*, are also overtly and
ideologically anti-American.
They are committed to undermining
American security and endangering Americans. This weekend, on Sunday,
Colombia will become the tenth government within the region controlled
by the hard left when the country’s new President Gustavo Petro will
take office. I am deeply worried that once he does, Colombia will join
the ranks of anti-American forces in Colombia. Petro is the first openly
Marxist to be elected president of Colombia. He was brought to power by
Colombia’s leftist fringe, including guerillas and terrorist groups.
*
Although Cruz does not mention the “socialist” countries by name, my
guess is that they are Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Mexico, Argentina,
Chile, Peru, Honduras and Bolivia, and that the aforementioned exception
is Chile.
Granted, Ted Cruz is only a US senator, and in the
minority party at that, though that will probably change in November.
While he may sit on the highly influential Senate Committee on Foreign
Relations, his immoderate views do not reflect those of the Biden
Administration, which has so far been surprisingly supportive of the
Petro government — at least in public — even as Colombia has sought to
rebuild diplomatic ties with its neighbor (and long-time US foe)
Venezuela.
“The times have changed,” says Juan González, Biden’s
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs. “We
are going to look for areas of common interest and we are going to
advance them,” he told a packed auditorium of Colombian businessman last
week, adding (and this is the interesting part):
“Forty years
ago, the United States would have done everything possible to prevent
the election of Gustavo Petro, and once in power it would have done
almost everything possible to sabotage his government (…) A government’s
ideology or where it sits on the political spectrum does not matter. If
he is elected and governs democratically, we are going to look for
areas of common interest and advance them; we are also going to
communicate our concerns more.”
It would be nice to think this is
true, that after more than 200 years of the Monroe Doctrine, of
toppling democratically elected governments and killing their leaders
because their policies do not fully align with US strategic and economic
interests, Washington has finally mended its ways. But it is probably
best to reserve judgment.
EU Joins the Race for Resources
The
EU is also looking to refocus its attentions on Latin America,
according to a document prepared by the European External Action Service
(EEAS), headed by EU’s top diplomat Josep Borrell. After receiving
advance copy of the document, El País reports that Europe now feels
ready once again to prioritize Latin America after being waylaid by
“problems in its own immediate neighborhood,” in countries like Libya,
Syria and now Ukraine, all of which have been through the rigmarole of a
US or NATO-enabled war. Not exactly comforting.
While the US and
Europe made war in Europe’s borderlands, China multiplied its
investment in Latin America 26-fold between 2000 and 2020 and is now
“the first or second most important trading partner of Latin American
and Caribbean countries, displacing the EU and surpassing the United
States in many countries.” Plus, 21 of the region’s 33 countries have
joined China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
According to the
document, Brussels will try to reverse this trend with a “qualitative
leap” in the intensity of its relations and contact. “The credibility of
the EU and its power and ability to leverage on the international scene
is at stake,” warns the document.
What the document doesn’t say
is that the EU’s credibility and ability to leverage on the
international scene are already in tatters and arguably beyond repair,
largely as a result of its own backfiring sanctions on Russia. That
said, there are occasional doses of realism as the report charts the
EU’s gradual loss of influence, though not once does it direct the blame
to where it belongs (i.e. with itself):
At the beginning of his
mandate, Borrell set out to strengthen the EU’s presence and influence
in Latin America. But the pandemic prevented closer ties. And the
Russian invasion of Ukraine has revealed not only that Europe has lost a
lot of ground to China, but that many Latin American countries do not
share the European response to the war launched by Russian President
Vladimir Putin.
The text notes that Europe has taken a back foot
in many of the 33 countries that make up the region, while China’s
economic interests and Russia’s political influence have gained a
stronger foothold. The EU now wants to play catch up, which it will
apparently do by throwing money at Latin America, just as the region
braces for a “perfect storm, with rising interest rates and little
margin when it comes to fiscal policy,” says Javi López, an MEP and
president of the European delegation in the Euro-Latin American
Parliamentary Assembly.
All told, Brussels is considering an
investment package that could mobilize €8 billion, which is a drop in
the ocean compared to what China brings to the table. But here’s the
best part: according to the El País article, the EU is not being guided
by “mere altruism” — “the EU document highlights that three countries in
the area – Bolivia, Argentina and Chile – have 60% of the lithium
reserves located on the planet, and Venezuela, Argentina and Brazil have
important oil and gas reserves. These are hydrocarbons in which the EU
is about to lose its main supplier: Russia.”
In other words,
after trying to end its dependence on Russian energy, with limited
success and disastrous consequences for the region’s economies, the
energy-starved EU needs hydrocarbon energy, even in its dirtiest, most
polluting forms, from wherever it can get it. And that includes Latin
America. The EU assumes it should have easy access to the region’s
resources, much as it has had for centuries. But times have changed. For
the moment China is winning the resource race in the region, thanks
largely to its well-honed strategy of offering all the perks of trade
and investment with little in the way of conditions.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.