[Salon] Quantum Leap on Ukraine Needed at White House



From: James Nathan   December 2, 2022

At his December 1 press appearance with President Macron, President Biden said that the U.S. did not anticipate how brutal Russia would be in Ukraine.

Given the example of Grozny, pulverized by Russian artillery until it resembled Hiroshima, how could we be surprised? There is also the lesson of Sarajevo where the Bosnian Serbs destroyed the utilities and then targeted water and food distribution points. Heating consisted of burning books page-by-page and whatever else was flammable.

And now Biden is surprised at what is happening in Ukraine!

He is either poorly advised by his Secretary of State and/or NSC adviser or is stubbornly refusing to acknowledge the situation. A similar mind-set was on display during the evacuation of Kabul 15 months ago.


In last two months, Ukraine’s energy infrastructure on the brink of collapse. Transformers and exposed lines can be repaired, but as  weather gets colder, more and more demands mean less heat and light and access to the internet for tens of millions.

 In addition, the Russians hit gas pipelines as well as 10 gas production facilities in the Kharkiv and Poltava regions, threatening the centralized heating systems of Ukraine’s cities. 

The electric grid is also under attack. Ukraine claims it has procured some1,700 generators, yet to be delivered, but the are not  nearly enough, and Ukrainian officials are said to be scouring the world for many more. The question of secure in-time delivery and qualified electrical workers is yet to be addressed. If the unmitigated or unthwarted attacks keep up, survival will be impossible for most people in cities. <https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/11/23/ukraine-infrastructure-damage-electricity-water-russia/>

Most Ukrainian railroads operate at very slow speeds making the vulnerable to fast raids by Russian attack planes, and drones.  Russians have regularly hit busy train stations in Kiev Dnipropetrovsk region, Kharkiev and elsewhere. 

Since 2/3rd of Ukraine’s trains are diesel, a giant exodus conceivably would ensue reminiscent of the last vast displacements of civilians in the Second World War with roadways and fields jammed with refugees.

Strategic Paralysis:
Since the 1920s, military planners have envisioned “hitting an enemy’s great nerve centers” rather than the opposing army, with the object of making support of the opposing army untenable. American strategists know that dominance of air, space, and the electronic spectrum are essential features of defeating armed forces of any kind.

Still, American policy makers have refused to transfer requisite arms to Ukraine and the pace has been too little, usually quite late.

To be sure, Ukraine has done amazingly well with Soviet era S-300 anti-missile defense systems, most recently shooting down 51 of 70 cruise missiles and all five drones in one evening's assault.  But, as the Institute of the Study of War puts it, “Russian military is still able to attack Ukrainian critical infrastructure at scale,” and at will, <https://www.understandingwar.org/project/ukraine-project> in battles that depend on who is more depleted of which arms, first.

Vastly increased air defense systems are required. Ukraine received its first modern air defense weapons only in November with the arrival of German-American made  National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems as well as the Italian made Aspide air defense system. The NSSAMS shot down 10 out of 10 Russian missiles on November 15th, in their first week of deployment.  The US has also started sending Vietnam- era Hawk systems that have been languishing in storage for decades.  But more will be required if the Russians field yet more surface to air weapons.

The American modern, follow-on anti-missile system are Patriots which the US has not considered transferring to Ukraine on the grounds that it takes, purportedly, up to year to train. Ironically, we are nearly a year into this war.  Apparently, the US did not believe Ukraine would last and was offering enough to bleed the Russians, but not enough to quickly and decisively defeat the invaders.
There is a vast need for generators.  Individualized gas-powered generators for homes, schools, and hospitals might well bridge some power needs during outages. One idea is to use the Defense Production Act since domestic generators such Generac which have excess inventory and decreased demand. [https://www.barrons.com/articles/generac-earnings-stock-inventory-51666192678]

US could deploy one of our two hospital ships to Odessa. These are 1,000-bed ships with enough shore power to light and run a nearby small land based hospital.[https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/6-691-seminar-in-electric-power-systems-spring-2006/92249d9acca97bf0fd5d94038d16f77d_ship_to_shore.pdf]

The Seabees could install generation at the Moldovan and Polish frontier and supply lines to be installed in ground, relatively secure from air attack. US competence in this area is unproven as Puerto Rico, Iraq, and Afghanistan demonstrate, but perhaps working with European partners would garner better results, possibly including emergency exploitation of gas reserves that are the second highest in Europe.

For now, most urgently, the nuclear plants of Ukraine need to be secured by an international force, perhaps raised outside of NATO, but from European forces. If one of those plants goes critical, a continent-wide disaster is all but assured. 


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.