[Salon] Will Algeria lose its gas moment?



Will Algeria lose its gas moment?

Summary: Italy and Europe look to Algeria to reduce their dependence on Russian gas, but the North African country’s lack of strategic economic thinking has reinforced the perception that it is an unstable partner.

We thank Francis Ghilès for today’s article which is a version, edited for length, of a paper delivered at the Africa Energies Summit in London 18 May. He is a  specialist on security, energy, and political trends in North Africa and the Western Mediterranean and  an associate senior researcher at the Barcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB.) From 1981 to 1995 Francis was the North Africa correspondent for the Financial Times. He is a regular contributor to the Arab Digest newsletter and podcasts.  His most recent podcast Algeria and Europe’s scramble for gas is available here. 

With about 8% of market share, Algeria is the third-biggest natural gas supplier to Europe. It has direct pipelines to Italy and the Iberian Peninsula. It also supplies gas in Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) form to France, Belgium, the UK, Greece and Turkey. It has always honoured its contracts since it started exporting gas in 1964.

As Italy has been working to reduce its dependence on Russia, it has been looking to Algeria, its second-largest gas supplier, which has agreed to increase its deliveries with the aim of reaching 30 billion cubic metres/annum by 2024 rather than the current level of 21 bcm/annum.  Whether it can seize the moment offered by the war in Ukraine as Europe’s Faustian pact with Putin unravels spectacularly will depend on the capacity of the country’s rulers to construct a long-term strategy. That will only happen when they rewrite the rules of the command economy which have prevailed since independence.

The military and missed opportunities

Fifty years ago, the minister of industry, whose remit included energy could boast that “Algeria will be the Japan of Africa in the year 2000.” Nothing of the sort happened and Algeria’s military never learnt the lessons from the economic success of countries such as China, South Korea and Turkey. It persists in its refusal to allow major Algerian companies to integrate into the world market. Many private entrepreneurs, economists and engineers have left a country which excels at cannibalising its elites.

For a generation, Algeria has been deindustrialising. Investment in industry amounted to 30% of GDP until the early 1980s. Today it amounts to less than 10% - compared to an average of 30% in emerging Asian economies. The economic ambitions of Algeria’s second president, Colonel Houari Boumedienne (1965-1978) may have been exaggerated but he must be turning in his grave when he contemplates the economic illiteracy of his successors. The result is that the next generation is being deprived of jobs and - more importantly - hope. To enhance its role as gas supplier to Europe would offer the country more regional influence.

There are plenty of new gas reserves to be found in Algeria. The war in Ukraine offers the country a unique opportunity to modernise its energy sector and, by developing the production of hydrogen, ammonia and solar power, to insert its economy into global networks. Do Algeria’s leaders appreciate that a well-equipped army is no substitute for a diversified and open economy? I very much doubt so.

A problem in plain sight and a potential solution

The outlines of Algeria’s energy problem lie in plain sight. Gas is supplied to Sonelgaz, which has a monopoly on the production and sale of electricity at less than $0.30/MMbtu, a price which does not cover (state-owned energy company) Sonatrach’s production costs. The efficiency rate of its old power plants is very low (around 36%) and grid losses are high. Exports will start to decline after 2025 due to lack of output and could grind to a halt after 2030 as production may have to be reserved for domestic consumption.


Algeria could seize the current opportunity and monetise waste gas through existing infrastructure

Current gas production of 130 bcm is divided into three almost equal parts: consumption, export and reinjection, but a recent report highlights a point which has long been overlooked. “By capturing gas from flaring, venting, and leaking in the region, Europe could within 12-24 months start to substitute up to 15% of Russian gas” which would also allow gas producers to “significantly reduce CO2-equivalent emissions without delaying the energy transition and greatly benefit from new revenue streams to reinvest in clean energy sources.” The scale of this underappreciated supply source of wasted gas is staggering. It amounts to 260 bcm per year worldwide. And for Algeria, this was around 9 bcm in 2020, with gas flaring intensity, at twenty three cubic metres per barrel, more than four times the global average. The irony is that much of this flared, vented and leaked gas could not only be captured with proven solutions that make money, but also could be exported to Europe via the country’s two pipelines and two LNG terminals, which in aggregate are dramatically underused.

The subsidies trade off

The policy of showering subsidies on consumers when the price of oil is high and making unexpected and deep cuts when it falls has been pursued for forty years. It has seriously weakened the industrial base the country built in the 1970s.

Any overhaul of Algeria’s energy policy will have to tackle the very political question of subsidies. Algeria’s leadership has always traded cheap prices of staple food and energy in exchange for the acceptance of autocratic rule. The Hirak (protests) demonstrated that millions of Algerians wanted a say in their country’s future. Structural reform will be impossible without a popular debate. But since there is no space for public debate, foisting structural reform on Algerians without it would be a recipe for more instability.  Fobbing off people with a new law enacted after a debate in the national assembly is sure to fail.

Oil and gas nationalism versus the private sector

Oil and gas nationalism has been strong in Algeria because of the country’s bitter fight for independence. That came in 1962, two years later than might have been the case because President Charles de Gaulle tried to detach the Sahara, where oil had just been discovered, from the newly emerging nation. (It was the founder of ENI, Enrico Mattei who advised the Provisional Government of the Algerian Republic during its negotiations with France in 1960-1962.)  Many Algerians remain hostile to the idea of private Algerian capital ever playing a role in this sector. Foreign investment is often viewed with suspicion, but there is little informed public debate on the subject. This only encourages conspiracy theories. Yet more and more Algerians understand that international companies have, historically made a very positive contribution to the building of the energy and industrial infrastructure. Nor are they blind to the role private Algerian entrepreneurs could play in the energy sector

If Algeria seizes its gas moment, that will help to enhance Italy’s key role as a gas hub in the Mediterranean and encourage it to play a more ambitious and independent role in shaping Europe’s policy towards the region. As for Algeria, it can only blame itself if it fails to rise to the historic challenge it faces and loses a unique opportunity to enhance its energy and industrial cooperation with Europe.


Members can leave comments about this newsletter on the Today's Newsletter page of the Arab Digest website
follow us on TwitterLinkedIn and Facebook

Copyright © 2022 Arab Digest, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as you are subscribed to the Arab Digest.
Our mailing address is:
Arab Digest
3rd Floor
207 Regent Street
London, W1B 3HH
United Kingdom



 To unsubscribe from this list email editor@arabdigest.org


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.