[Salon] THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH SERVES PUTIN AS IT ONCE SERVED STALIN
- To: "[Salon]" <salon@committeefortherepublic.org>
- Subject: [Salon] THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH SERVES PUTIN AS IT ONCE SERVED STALIN
- From: Chas Freeman <cwfresidence@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 19:18:37 -0400
- Authentication-results: mlm2.listserve.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ROCaxbFe"
- Authentication-results: semf08.mfg.siteprotect.com; iprev=pass (mail-lf1-f53.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.53; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
- Authentication-results: mfg.siteprotect.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cwfresidence@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=gmail.com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mlm2.listserve.net D8F2CB07E3
THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH SERVES PUTIN AS IT ONCE SERVED STALIN
BY
Allan C. Brownfeld
———————————————————————————————————————————-
The
more things change with the Russian Orthodox Church and its relations
with those in power, the more they remain the same. Just as the Church
embraced Stalin and did his bidding, and submitted to his control, so
today’s Church leaders have embraced Vladimir Putin and his brutal
assault upon Ukraine. It is interesting to note that Stalin himself
seems to remain a Church favorite. In 2014, for example, the Russian
Orthodox Church published a calendar devoted to Stalin. Mikhail Babkin,
a noted Russian historian specializing in the Church, says that, “The
link between the Moscow Patriarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church and
Stalin remains close to sacred.”
Hours
before Putin launched his attack on Ukraine, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow,
head of the Russian Orthodox Church, spoke to military leaders. He
congratulated Putin for his “high and responsible service to the people
of Russia,” declared that the Russia Orthodox Church has “always striven
to make a significant contribution to the patriotic education of
compatriots,” and lauded military service as an “active manifestation
of evangelical love for neighbors.”
Kirill’s
rhetoric escalated as the invasion continued. He referred to
Ukrainians as “evil forces” and delivered a sermon on March 6 in which
he suggested the invasion was part of a larger “metaphysical struggle”
against “immoral Western values.”
Originally,
the Communists who launched the 1917 Russian Revolution, sought to
eliminate religion. They closed churches and murdered priests. The
Nazi attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 induced Stalin to enlist the
Russian Orthodox Church as an ally to arouse Russian patriotism.
Churches were reopened and religious life experienced a revival. They
became a virtual arm of the state. Stalin soon saw the Church as a tool
to help aid in the reoccupation of Eastern Europe. Putin seems to see
it in precisely the same way.
I
became aware of the manner in which the Russian Orthodox Church was used
for political purposes when I was a young staff member of the U.S.
Senate Internal Security Subcommittee in the mid-1960s, when it was
conducting a series of hearings about religious persecution in Communist
countries. One of our leading witnesses was the Rev. Richard
Wurmbrand, and it became my responsibility to usher him around
Washington and assist him in preparation of his testimony. His impact
upon me and upon all who met him was profound.
Wurmbrand
was a Romanian Lutheran pastor whose determination to spread the word
of God led to his being imprisoned for fourteen years and tortured by
Communist authorities. He came to prominence when he was ransomed from
the Romanian government by a group of Norwegian Christians for $10,000.
Shortly thereafter, he came to Washington to testify. His life made
him a witness to the horrors of the twentieth century—-and to those who
continued to look away.
Born in 1901 to
a Jewish family, he converted to Christianity in 1936. In 1938, his
part of Romania became part of the Soviet Union, only to be invaded by
German troops in 1940. From then until 1943 most of its large Jewish
population was deported, starved or massacred. Though under great
threat themselves, Wurmbrand and his wife Sabine, brought several
children out of the ghetto and concealed them. Later, after Soviet
armies occupied Romania, he was imprisoned by the Communists. While
ill with typhus he was sentenced at a secret trial to twenty years
imprisonment. He was beaten, bound and subjected to brainwashing.
Upon
his arrival in the West, Wurmbrand was asked why he had been arrested
by the Communists. His reply, even in the unfamiliar English tongue,
was piercing: “This is a question that is put to you in the West…With
us the question is why somebody is not arrested. A colleague of mine
was sentenced to seven years imprisonment because on Christmas Eve he
preached that Jesus, being a babe, Herod wished to kill him, but his
Holy Mother fled with him to Egypt. This was the charge: that he hoped
Nasser would be on the side of imperialists and therefore he mentioned
Egypt.”
When the Communists triumphed
in Romania in 1945, for the crime of preaching the Gospel, he spent
fourteen years in prison, much of the time in solitary confinement. But
he was not alone: “I met in prison all those who had praised Communism
, all those who had collaborated with Communism, and they were treated
just like me. They had been fools.”
During
our Senate hearings, representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church and
other churches in Communist countries denied that there was religious
persecution in Communist countries. Many American clergymen said the
same thing. Wurmbrand had a conversation with Eugene Carson Blake,
General Secretary of the World Council of Churches (WCC), in which
churches in Communist countries were members. He told Dr. Blake of the
conditions Christians must endure in Communist countries. Blake
replied: “I do not have to hear about conditions in Communist countries
from refugees like you. I am in direct touch with the hierarchy.”
This,
Wurmbrand pointed out, is much like telling Jewish refugees from Nazism
that there is no need to talk with them about conditions in Germany,
because more accurate reports could be obtained by direct communication
with the Nazis themselves.”
In the
January 1966 issue of the International Review of Missions, published by
the WCC, Wurmbrand found the following description of religious life in
Romania: “The churches in Romania, both Orthodox and Protestant, are
carrying out their work in an atmosphere of full religious Liberty and
very good ecumenical cooperation…A large number of projects are being
undertaken at the present time. Where necessary the Romanian Government
provides financial aid, although the restored buildings remain the
property of the churches and are used exclusively for religious
functions.”
Wurmbrand wrote the author,
asking when the Bible had been published in Romania, where a Sunday
school could be found or a seminary. He received no answer and
commented that, “If the man who wrote this has not taken thousands of
dollars from the Romanian secret police, he deserves to be hanged for
stupidity.”
From October 27 to November
4, 1966, Christianity Today magazine, the National Association of
Evangelicals, and Evangelist Billy Graham, sponsored a World Congress on
Evangelism in Berlin. Wurmbrand was invited to participate in this
meeting, but the invitation was later withdrawn. The reason: he might
direct some critical comments at Communism, which would “endanger
fellowship with Eastern churches.”
In a
letter to Billy Graham, Wurmbrand noted that official Communist church
representatives always speak about “political subjects” such as the war
in Vietnam but that they refuse to permit anti-Communists to say
anything ‘political’ at church meetings. This, of course, is done with
the full approbation of Western church leaders. And, he wrote, “What of
Billy Grahams behind the Iron Curtain?…You surely must have on your
prayer list your colleagues, the Billy Grahams of the East who sit in
prison or may already have died in prison for the only crime of having
been evangelists. You surely know the names of Kuzyck, Prokofiev,
Grunvald, Invanenko, Granny Shefchuk…and others in Romania. How can a
World Congress of Evangelism not speak about these martyrs of evangelism
and give the due honor to their names? If we desire to evangelize the
world, we have to plan at this Congress in Berlin how best to oppose
Communism and how to continue there secretly the evangelization of the
peoples oppressed by the Bolshevists.”
When
Wurmbrand returned to the U.S., he discovered that he was under attack
from still another quarter. The president of the American Lutheran
Church, the Rev. Frederick A. Schiotz, had distributed a letter to his
fellow pastors containing a number of blatant untruths. According to
Wurmbrand, the major one was that he was permitted to leave Romania
because of intercession by the WCC in behalf of Christian prisoners:
“How could that be? The WCC itself is of the opinion that there is
complete religious freedom in Romania.”
Later,
Wurmbrand established Jesus to the Communist World (later, Voice of the
Martyrs), a Bible-smuggling mission, and traveled around the world
lecturing and preaching and published the book “Tortured for Christ,”
his account of his suffering in Romanian Communist jails. It became an
international best-seller and became the first of many books praising
the Eastern European “heroes” of the faith. After the execution of
Romania’s Communist President Nicolae Ceausescu in 1989, Wurmbrand
returned to preach in Romania, where he was welcomed as a hero. He died
in 2001 at the age of 91. I wonder what he would think of today’s
Russian Orthodox Church endorsing Russia’s slaughter of innocent
civilians in Ukraine. He would be saddened, but would not be surprised.
Whether it is Stalin or Putin, the Russian Orthodox Church, with a few
brave dissenters, can apparently be relied upon to serve an oppressive
state.
##
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.