Obsession
is a blinding passion. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines obsession
as “a persistent disturbing preoccupation with an often unreasonable
idea or feeling.” The Cambridge dictionary defines obsession as “the
control of one’s thoughts by a continuous, powerful idea or feeling, or
the idea or feeling itself.” The Journal of Anxiety Disorders, a
psychiatric publication, writes that “(obsessions) are associated with
psychopathology domains in a manner comparable to general
obsessive-compulsive symptoms.” The literature attributes the modern
proliferation of political obsessions to the increased influence of
disaggregated social media.
Obsessions, in short, make us into
that moon-struck pimply teenager obsessed with the cruel redhead tease
in his 10th grade class.
Political obsessions drive divisions
within society, and even families, that make dialogue impossible and
often lead to violence. Politicians everywhere have exploited obsession
as a powerful tool to control supporters. The leaders of the antebellum
South and Adolf Hitler, among many others, exploited obsessive hatred of
blacks and Jews, respectively, to grab power and then drove their
people into disasters. In the United States, for example, obsessions
with immigration, abortion, gender identity, guns, and racism, to
mention the most viral, drive politics on both sides of the issues. The
problem with obsession is that it prevents the obsessed from dealing
rationally with the issues at hand.
The sociopathy of obsession
prevents rational discussion of practical solutions to what are often
real problems. Let’s take immigration, for example. Decades of neglect
by both parties have led us to a crisis of millions at our southern
border clamoring to enter the United States. Instead of a rational
discussion, we have degenerated into a shouting match over the
“replacement theory”, a truly unhinged argument that a political party
created the worldwide movement of millions of people in order to replace
‘real, i.e., white,’ Americans or Europeans with (darker) foreigners.
Obsession is infectious. The European Union almost fell apart five years
ago over the influx of Syrian refugees into one EU country, Greece.
Populist politicians almost wrecked the EU over the issue of how to deal
with an influx less than 0.002% (i.e., one five hundredth) of its total
population! Obsessions crippled policy making and led to stupidities
such as barbed wire on internal EU boundaries, detention camps on small
Greek islands to hold thousands in limbo, and the building of the Great
Wall of America. These “solutions” mostly benefited wannabe
authoritarians in Europe while, in the US, it made human smugglers and
contractors filthy rich.
These measures have failed to stop
uncontrolled immigration, just as jailing millions of Americans and
financing Latin American drug wars have not made a dent in drug
smuggling. In the case of narcotics, we failed to address the domestic
drug addiction that makes us such a lucrative market and the failure of
good governance in Latin America that makes growing coca the only means
of economic survival.
We know why the US and Europe are such
magnets for migrants, whether political or economic. We are both large,
prosperous, relatively stable countries enjoying the rule of law. More
importantly, we both share an enormous need for workers of all types to
continue economic growth while our populations age. We ignore the
failure of both the US and the EU to deal with the collapse of
governance in our neighborhoods that unleashed the flood of migrants.
Admittedly it’s not easy and it would cost money but resolving crises in
the regions pumping out the migrants would save much more in terms of
money, political stability and human life.
We seem to have
forgotten that millions of Europeans fled to the United States in the
aftermath of World War II. Similarly, Northern Europeans seem to have
forgotten the influx of millions of migrant workers from poorer southern
European countries in the 1950's. We ignore the fact that once the
countries that sent the migrants stabilized and their economies
improved, the post-WWII migration flow dried up to both the US and
northern Europe. More recently, Americans did not notice that the
much-maligned NAFTA so improved the Mexican economy that more people
migrated from the US to Mexico rather than the other way around. The
EU’s admission of ex-Warsaw Pact countries twenty years ago sent
millions westward looking for jobs while the Euro crisis of 2010-2018
provoked an exodus of 500,000 Greeks. Now, Western Europe can’t find
farm workers and the British National Health Service lacks doctors and
nurses. Migration into Greece has also turned positive. Many young
Greeks are returning, along with many Europeans (and even some
Americans) taking up residence as “digital nomads.”
The US has
the financial, political, and even military (if necessary) muscle to
address the collapse of governance in Central America’s turbulent
Northern Triangle, (El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala) from whence
most of today’s migrants flee. Our outrageous failure to help restore
order in Haiti has sent thousands of Haitians fleeing to the US. Such
policies need money and good diplomacy up front, but we should not
forget that the Marshall Plan in Europe paid back its huge investment
thousandfold. Europe ignored the opportunities offered by the Arab
Spring uprisings to nurture democracy and good governance across the
other side of the Mediterranean. Europe’s failure to buttress Tunisia’s
nascent democracy should shame every EU government. Now unscrupulous
politicians in the US and EU exploit the resentments directed at waves
of immigrants.
Obsessions about immigration as well as about
guns, abortion, and so many other issues, are collective mental
illnesses. That illness guarantees that these problems will remain
unresolved, to the delight of the politicians who exploit them. If more
sober leaders across the political spectrum do not come together to
address those issues reasonably, they will feed that obsession, which
will inevitably lead to feeding hatred and violence. Is that the world
we want for our children?