[Salon] Iran and a very dangerous situation



Iran and a very dangerous situation

Summary: with the JCPOA talks going nowhere and the Biden administration seemingly dismissive of the threat Iran poses to Middle East security whilst focussing on China and the war in Ukraine, the West may be sleepwalking towards a potentially disastrous conflagration in the region.

A frequent criticism of the JCPOA that Barack Obama negotiated as the key piece of his foreign policy legacy was that the deal did nothing to address the Islamic Republic of Iran’s geopolitical ambitions and the threat to the Middle East those ambitions posed then and continue to pose now.  With the talks in Vienna stalled, the hope in the region that the Biden administration would use a renewed deal as leverage for a follow-on agreement forcing Iran to curb its hostile actions in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen and curtail its ballistic missiles programme is as moribund today as the deal itself seems to be.

Speaking at a Chatham House panel on 2 February the Iranian-American academic Kian Tajbakhsh argued that Iran has been “remarkably successful…basically stomping across the Middle East.” Tajbakhsh (who was detained for several years in Iran before being released the day the JCPOA deal was signed in Vienna 14 July, 2015) pointed to the success of  the Islamic Republic “outwitting the West”  by sustaining Syria’s Bashar al-Assad in power and by controlling Lebanon while using Hezbollah to menace Israel over several decades. He called Iran “a non-contiguous state which is essentially an armed proxy state.”

Further, the extent to which Teheran dictates the political and security environment in Iraq is well documented as is its support, via weapons smuggling, for the Houthis in Yemen. All of this is accomplished at a relatively small cost and with little risk of major consequence particularly since the current sanctions, as with previous ones, have found more than enough backchannels and supportive states to avoid the sort of economic punishment that would cause Iran sufficient hurt to back off.


On January 15 U.S. partner naval forces seized over 3,000 AK-47 assault rifles, 578,000 rounds of ammo, and 23 advanced anti-tank guided missiles from an Iranian ship in the Gulf of Oman, the fifth such operation in a little over two months [photo credit: CENTCOM]

To those who see the current wave of demonstrations as proof that the regime is weakening and therefore imperilled, Tajbakhsh’s comments are worthwhile noting:

The regime has managed to remain in power and avoid any great fissures within the leadership and to circumvent enough of the sanctions and the isolation so as to provide enough social and economic goods to people in the society so that the stakes of the middle classes to overthrow the system are quite high…

Protests and revolts are an ordinary day’s work for an authoritarian regime…authoritarians do not rule with the consent of the people. When you know you are going to face constant, sporadic uprisings you’ve got to beat them down. And if you fail you get overthrown. It is not the weakness of an authoritarian system that there are revolts, it is a weakness if the revolts cannot be put down.

With China purchasing Iran’s oil and the Iranians supplying drones for Putin’s war, the Islamic Republic has lined up two powerful foreign allies, while suppressing domestic dissent. Meanwhile the Middle East watches with continuing anxiety as the Biden administration seems, as did Obama, ready to ignore the existential threat, one that looms larger as Iran moves closer to acquiring the capability to build a nuclear weapon. That is something that neither the Gulf states nor Israel is going to allow to happen. The Israelis have made clear both in their language and their actions that, with or without the US, they will take whatever steps they deem necessary.  For his part Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed bin Salman has long been unequivocal in stating that if the Iranians secure nuclear weapons, his kingdom will too. It is, as Kristian Coates Ulrichsen told us in last week’s podcast, a very dangerous situation:

The geopolitical context is a tinderbox. It's just waiting for that spark to set it alight…. We're now in a sort of worst of both worlds.  There's no JCPOA. But there's also no post-JCPOA follow-on agreement. And so in that context, in that vacuum, there are certainly all sorts of subterranean activities which are taking place, each of which could be that spark.


Members can leave comments about this newsletter on the Today's Newsletter page of the Arab Digest website
follow us on TwitterLinkedIn and Facebook

Copyright © 2023 Arab Digest, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as you are subscribed to the Arab Digest.
Our mailing address is:
Arab Digest
3rd Floor
207 Regent Street
London, W1B 3HH
United Kingdom



 To unsubscribe from this list email editor@arabdigest.org


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.