The
tax cuts signed into law by former President Trump at the end of 2017
were a boon for profitable corporations, according to a new report
released by the Government Accountability Office. It finds the average
effective federal income tax rate paid by large, profitable corporations
fell to 9 percent in the first year that the Trump tax law was in
effect, and the share of such companies paying nothing at all rose to 34
percent that year.
This is consistent with our findings that profitable corporations often pay little or nothing. While the corporate minimum tax passed this summer will help, Congress now needs to pass the international corporate minimum tax to further address this problem.
The
GAO analysis presents many different types of figures, but all show the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was an unprecedented gift to corporations. For
example, it finds that the share of all corporations paying no
federal income taxes was 67 percent in 2018 and had not changed much
over the years. But that is not so surprising because that figure
includes tiny companies and companies reporting losses, which are not
expected to pay income taxes. (The federal corporate income tax is,
after all, a tax on profits, not losses).
Much more alarming are
the GAO’s conclusions about corporations that are both large (which GAO
defines as having at least $10 million in assets) and profitable. The
share of these companies paying nothing rose from 22 percent in 2014 to
34 percent in 2018, the first year that the Trump tax law was in effect.
What
the GAO report really demonstrates is that no matter how you measure
the federal corporate income tax, not much of it has been paid in recent
years, and the 2017 tax law has brought it to a new low.
The
average effective federal income tax rate paid by these companies (the
share of profits they paid in federal income taxes) fell from an
already-low 16 percent in 2014 to a nearly rock-bottom-low 9 percent in
2018.
These estimates use corporations’ actual tax liability based
on IRS data that is not available to researchers outside the
government. Still, the GAO report shows that the “current” tax reported
by publicly traded corporations in the filings they submit to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (which is what ITEP uses to identify
how much specific corporations pay) comes to roughly the same answers.
For
example, while GAO found that average effective tax rates based on
actual tax liability (using IRS data) fell from 16 percent in 2014 to 9
percent in 2018, an alternative version of those figures calculated
using current taxes reported in the public filings are just a bit
different, at 17 percent in 2014 and 8 percent in 2018.
Even
profitable corporations might pay nothing in one year because they are
allowed to carry forward losses from previous years. If the system works
as intended, corporations that are profitable in the long run will pay
taxes at a reasonable effective rate over time. But the GAO analysis
demonstrates that even if the data is adjusted to ignore the deductions
that companies can claim for losses, the conclusions do not change very
much (in which case the average effective income tax rates increase
slightly to 18 percent in 2014 and 10 percent in 2018). This is
unsurprising because ITEP has followed corporations that were profitable
each year for several years in a row and found that even these
fortunate companies often manage to pay nothing over time.
What
the GAO report really demonstrates is that no matter how you measure
the federal corporate income tax, not much of it has been paid in recent
years, and the 2017 tax law has brought it to a new low.
The corporate minimum tax enacted as part of the Inflation Reduction Act will help address this problem. But as ITEP has explained,
another key step for Congress is to implement the international
corporate minimum tax that the Biden administration negotiated with
other governments, and which is designed to address the offshore tax
dodging that will otherwise be very difficult to resolve.