"We
have always been concerned by the fact that there is a dominance of the
dollar and that we do need to look at alternative… The systems
currently in place tend to privilege very wealthy countries and tend to
be really a challenge for countries, such as ourselves, which have to
make payments in dollars which costs much more in terms of our various
currencies. So I do think a fairer system has to be developed and it's
something we're discussing with the BRICS ministers in the economic
sector discussions," she said.
Pandor
said that one of the reasons why BRICS — Brazil, Russia, India, China,
and South Africa — set up the jointly-run New Development Bank (NDB) in
2014 was to find an alternative to the dollar-based payments
architecture.
"BRICS
has a number of sectoral committees that look at issues of politics and
security, the economy and people-to-people exchange, and within the
economic context we are looking at how the NDB and other institutional
formations may assist us to develop a fairer system of monetary
exchange," she explained.
Countering Malign Russian Activities in Africa Act
Foreign
Minister Naledi Pandor has also argued that South Africa warned the
United States that the bill seeking to counter Russia's "malign
activities" in Africa needs to be trashed because they violate international laws.
The
draft legislation was introduced in Congress in April by Rep. Gregory
Meeks. It passed the House in May and is awaiting the Senate's vote. If
enacted, the bill will direct the Secretary of State to come up with a
strategy for countering Russian influence in Africa and holding African governments accountable for aiding Russia's "proxies" through sanctions and other restrictions.
Unilateral sanctions
On
the issue of the US unilateral sanctions, Pandor noted that her country
pointed out to the US that it wants unilateral American sanctions to be
reviewed due to their impact on unrelated countries.
"We always have a problem with unilateral sanctions and their impact on many countries that fall outside a particular conflict, so we have indicated to our friends in the United States that we really want them to relook at this imposition of unilateral sanctions, which is often not very helpful a strategy in resolving problems," she said in an interview.
The
approach has not worked for Zimbabwe, Venezuela or Cuba, the diplomat
argued. She said South Africa might adhere to sanctions where it feels
that international or humanitarian law is infringed, "but where we feel
that these are merely unilateral impositions and don't have the
authority of the United Nations, we do not believe that South Africa is
bound by them," she said.