I hope people reading this (Sy’s article) for free will feel the need to subscribe to Sy’s Substack page so as to not miss anything from him!
But I looked back to my response to his “dispatch” of last week, which I fully stand on as an analysis of the political dynamics of the last 20+ years. There is some talk of possible plea bargains for 9/11 defendants, because the facts of their extreme torture by the CIA is now out in the open. Having gotten revealed, in part, by the Diane Feinstein led SSCI investigation of torture, over the zealous efforts of the Republicans to shut down the investigation. A Classified report came out of that which when Trump came into office, he fully criminalized the possession of that Report. With only a couple copies available now, but under seal, only due to a Judge's Order, if I recall correctly. And that saved over the Trump administration’s vigorous efforts to consign all copies “down the Memory Hole,” or at least “burn them."
I served as “resource attorney” to a team representing one of the 9/11 defendants (in addition to the other two legal teams I was on), and what I did was pieced together a “historical genealogy” of facts which explain the “causality of Mideast terrorism,” which began long before 9/11 and arose out of Western colonialism/imperialism. Graham Fuller’s writings on “Political Islam” were very helpful! What I lacked was a “theoretical” explanation of how “political grievances” when severe enough, almost inevitably lead to “armed resistance.” Which is always called “terrorism” by those doing the repressing, whether in Berlin in the 1930s-1940s, Britain’s in what became the U.S., India, Ireland, and Kenya, and wherever else their colonialism extended. As graffiti in West Belfast still proclaims: Repression Breeds Resistance! I found that in studying a bit of “how the mind works.” Which those on the opposite side of me politically also study, resulting in “Cognitive Warfare” theory/policy.
But the year before I was assigned to the Military Commissions Defense Office, in 2007, I attended a 2 or 3 day West Point event on the “Legal Basis for the Global War on Terrorism,” or something like that. Attending were all the most "fanatical hardliners” of the U.S., the Heritage Foundation most prominently, who were in league with the most “fanatical hardliners” of Israel. The “worst of the worst” there, spouting off like one could imagine Himmler would have, was the Heritage Foundation’s “terrorism expert.” When I would later be assigned, what is most correct to say, to "defending the U.S. Constitution,” including the First Amendment, in the Military Commissions, the main obstacle in that was always, guess who, the Republican Party’s elected officials, and their think tanks, with Heritage Foundation and AEI the "worst of the worst” in inciting war, and torture! With Heritage celebrating a Judge who said he would never uphold a habeas release order, no matter what were the facts!
Now I’m supposed to believe the Quincy Institute and The American Conservative magazine’s promotion and “sanitizing" of exclusively “hard-line Conservatives/Republicans,” as their favored politicians, as “Right-wing Peaceniks.” To include Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation, even though he, and the Republicans always promoted, like Chip Roy and Warren Davidson, are among the most fevered advocates of escalating war against China (and always Iran). And were the most fervent supporters of Torture! And Israel. And Trumpism, as the authoritarian ideology which provided even more cover for torturers than Obama had. With Trump making “Chief Torturer,” Bloody Gina Haspel, the CIA Director!
But back to the West Point event, the “Dean of Students” at West Point, Brig. Gen. Finnegan I believe his name was, was outspokenly opposed to the Hollywood promotion of the Bush administration’s torture programs, in the hit show, “24.” Going up against Hollywood Conservatives, and therefore, conservatives at the Heritage Foundation and in the Republican Party. Which with a few exceptions like Joe Lieberman and a couple others; it was the Republican Party which was vastly disproportionately the “purveyors” of Torture as USG policy. And have continued that even to a higher degree in the refusal of Trump to release even one victim of U.S. torture from Guantanamo! Except a Saudi as a favor to MBS.
The keynote speaker at the West Point dinner at the event, was Major General Tony Taguba. An obvious “up yours” to the Bush administration and their torture supporting allies, like the ragingly fevered, Traditional Conservative, Sen. Jeff Sessions, one of the absolute “Worst of the Worst!”
And now because a few “Conservatives” prefer waging war on China first, and directing more of our Warfighting resources to the IndoPacific instead of so much to the “Eastern Front” of Ukraine, we’re being sold a “bill of goods” in the form of creating the “myth," that Republicans and Conservatives have always stood for a policy of “Restraint and Realism.” Even though they as a party have always been in the forefront in calling for “more and faster” war, and charging their opponents when not holding the POTUS office, with being “weak.” It’s all part of the historical record, as opposed to the “Historical Fiction” genre that is being written by so-called “Realism and Restraint” Conservatives. A “nom de guerre” concealing that they’re providing “ideological cover” for the opposite, as can be seen with only a slightly “deeper analysis” of their pronouncements. Just as begun as a tactic in the US by the self-named “Conservatives” who were the original “Conservative Revolution” in the 1950s, following in the footsteps of the German “Conservative Revolution Movement,” with ideas of Carl Schmitt most influential in each.
That’s my Taguba and Heritage Foundation anecdote. With me having been in the “eye of the storm” in D.C. as the Republicans and Conservatives escalated their war against the U.S. Constitution, continuing what they’d begun in the 1950s, with a eyewitness view of how they were carrying that out. And not only "permitting” torture, but “demanding” it. And now I’m supposed to silently stand by and watch as some of the "worst of the worst” are sanitized by Conservative, Trump supporting media platforms, re-writing history? While I’m “still in the legal fight” opposing everything these “Conservative Revolutionaries” of the New Right stand for? With that including their opposing everything the Committee for the Republic ostensibly stands for. Perhaps a little “discord” is called for when “New Right” ideas (identical to their allied Israeli fascist’s ideas”) are directly, and “subliminally,” promoted in the Committee, rather than silent acquiescence?
On Aug 31, 2023, at 6:00 AM, Seymour Hersh <seymourhersh@substack.com> wrote:
US troops of the 23rd (Americal) Infantry Division ford a river about 11 miles west of Chu Lai in South Vietnam in August 1971. / Photo via Getty Images.
Mydispatchof last week about General Tony Taguba, Abu Ghraib prison, and the perils of telling the truth led to more responses than usual, including an extraordinary unpublished manuscript from reader Anthony St. John. A bright and patriotic graduate of St. Bonaventure University in upstate New York, he believed in America and the need to fight communism in South Vietnam. He was in the Army ROTC as a college student, and after a year of officer training he entered the Army as a second lieutenant. He ended his tour in mid-1968 as a first lieutenant in combat with the Americal Division—by far the least desirable assignment in that war and the division with the lowest morale. It was a company in the Americal Division that committed the My Lai massacre of up to five hundred peasants in March 1968. It was a horror I exposed as a young journalist eighteen months later. St. John knew nothing of that horror, but his manuscript, entitledThe Hippie Lieutenant, tells the truth when it comes to the day-to-day life of the grunts, the young men who were drafted or volunteered for combat. St. John, who now lives outside of Florence in Italy, where he teaches English, has a lot to say about the lack of integrity, as he saw it, in the officer corps, but the book is at its best in depicting life for the GIs in the triple canopy jungles of South Vietnam.
At three o’clock in the morning on a moonlit November 1967 day, Bravo Company and I were chest high in the turbid waters of an irrigation ditch adjacent to a rice paddy somewhere near the Cambodian border. We had been called to (Saddle up!) in the middle of the night because the S-3, our infantry battalion’s operations officer, had received an “intelligence” report indicating a massive enemy build-up some ten kilometers from our night position. With the moans and groans of one hundred and twenty men chewing and biting as if with toothless gums, the unit proceeded cautiously, but noisily, along the way and slushed through the long, narrow excavation’s soft mud.
To the right were acres and acres of rice paddies, and to the left a thick curtain of seemingly impenetrable jungle. The moon’s reflected light bounced off rice paddy waters, the sometimes sheeny leaves of jungle underbrush, and the shiny wet necks and hands of the men who marched disgustedly through the night. FTA. Some men kept their weapons and ammunition above their heads to keep their fire-fight equipment dry; most didn’t care and permitted their offensive instruments to sink, along with tired arms, into the roily waters.
It was not too long before the leeches made their climb up legs to crotches and backs of the weary and disgruntled grunts. There was no way to remove them—yet. Waterproof matches could not be lighted because they could reveal the company's position; and, scorching insect repellent could not be applied in the gloomy waters.
Suddenly, overpowering fright gripped the entire company as men made futile efforts to pick off the hangers-on whose suckers had embedded themselves in thighs, calves, shoulders, and even the sensitive skin of the scrotum. The unit was out of control. It was in an uproar. It was terrorized. Snakes had also been spotted in the marshy waterway. Some men jumped out of the water onto the slimy, tree-rooted ground bordering the left side of the irrigation canal. They discarded their weapons and ran bewildered into the nearby thickets where they ripped off fatigue shirts, then boots, then pants, and culled away at bloodsuckers with knives, mosquito repellent, and the butts of cigarettes which had been set aflame against regulations and common sense, all the while warning the stealthy scouts of a North Vietnam Army regiment, bedded down from the grunts versus leeches melee.
Against the company commanders’ wishes and orders—he could go take a flying f******o—the men continued the march refusing to reenter the trench filled with water that reached up to their necks. Instead, they groped along the muddied, wet banks making occasional falls into the water when they lost their grips on the roots of the trees adjacent to the banks of the narrow canal. Progress was severely impeded, and before long, the S-3 radioed his impatience and threat of relief from command if the company’s CO did not get to his objective posthaste. I actually felt sorry for the CO, but I remained content with the notion that I had not been in command. The CO could do nothing to speed the men up. He knew their tempers were very labile, and keeping himself as less authoritarian as he should have been, he did nothing to stir them into action which might have caused further panic and perhaps insurrection. He was thinking, thank goodness. He knew he had a simmering case of mass hysteria on his hands, and the delicacy of the predicament plus the irritated stance taken by the S-3, kept the infantry commander in a worried state as he expected the worst from his undisciplined, scared-to-death men.
More terror came. The early morning—illumination was nearly nil—was made for hallucinating. Strange visions were imagined by many of the exhausted men who cared to look deep within the forest to see things that had no reality. The moonlight and jungle thickets conspired to produce eerie delusions. One man mistook a water buffalo for an enemy soldier, but when he raised his dripping wet rifle to shoot at it, the weapon failed to function. The men were haggard and petulant. Desperate screams and falls from the banks into the irrigation ditch made the event pathetic, outlandish. Relief came finally around dawn when the long watercourse, that had been such a bothersome obstruction during two long, gruesome hours, ended, and the men—surveying, at the break of dawn, their leech bites and bloodied skin and clothes—laid exhausted on the ground and exchanged shameful expressions. Breakfast was being prepared by most of the grunts, while some tried to dry weapons and other essential equipment in a vain attempt to regain their soldierly equanimity which for the past two hours had degenerated to its lowest level. The CO was depressed, wordless. He knew his “men” were not really soldiers at all—just scared youth. He knew his men would be useless in any enemy contact. He knew there was something very wrong.
[The next morning, the men, exhausted by the leech attack, awoke to the sound of a sudden volley of artillery in the distance. The company was ordered to make an immediate march in support of fellow Americans under attack.]
In the chaos, the men of Bravo Company wished they were in an irrigation ditch pulling leeches off. They watched the Charlie company bodies being brought in and placed with Graves' Registration. They watched groups of fresh troops receive orders from colonels and majors, and then be sent out into the surrounding mountains to charge up their sides to meet the enemy. They watched Marines react with efficiency and professionalism in a manner they could only have dreamt about. They listened to artillery batteries swish volleys over their heads onto the attacking enemy positions and, very likely, unto American GIs. They looked to gray clouds in the skies and prepared for the late afternoon deluge. They watched the engineers lay sheet upon sheet of metal on the scraped surface of the runway that had been cleared away minutes ago. They filled gray sandbags with mounds of reddish dirt, and they took part in the building process of a modern war center at the foothills of the mountains that bordered Cambodia and Laos. They watched Chinook helicopters land with wounded men. They watched men on stretchers cup their hands with the intestines that were oozing out of their guts. They watched men who had no faces. They watched men who had no arms, no legs. They watched men who would never walk again because their spines were cracked with bullets. They watched men with napalm burns. They watched men walk into first aid tents carrying their own bottles of saline solution. They watched men with their brains blown out. They watched men whose eyes were wrapped with bloody gauze. They watched and they watched and they watched all the while filling sandbags, all the while confused by shame for not meeting up with Charlie company, and relief for not having to have been caught up in the ugly fray of a battle.
They recorded images which would make them feel disenfranchised from their very own country because they now realized they had been exploited to further the causes of injustice and unethicalness. They recorded images which would be scoffed at by political leaders after the “war” when it would become fashionable to look at Vietnam as a “diplomatic, militaristic” mistake to be forgotten so the economic and military frames of reference might lumber on uninterrupted. They recorded images which would be laughed at by their fellow countrymen and women who had always disregarded the facts about World I, World War II, the Korean War, and now were looking forever to cancel Vietnam from their superegos. They recorded images which would cause them so much agony and suffering that psychiatrists would term their behavior a syndrome, the post-Vietnam syndrome, PVS for psychiatric registration forms, and men, desperately reacting against the horrors of Vietnam, and the hopelessness of their own people, would be codified by national mental health experts so that they could join other post-war syndromic veterans who were allaying—in drunken stupors in Veterans of Foreign Wars and American Legion beer halls—the post-World War I Syndrome, the post-World War II Syndrome, and the post-Korean War Syndrome. They recorded images which would later cause them to glue themselves to whatever negative issues they could cook up about their country, and they sank deeper into the mire of letdown and nihilism that would later spread further and further through all segments of American society that looked not to face the realities of Vietnam, but, rather, looked to try to blot out an awkward national error that had taken away a great deal of the prestige the United States had before had in the eyes of other nations. They recorded images which would act as a cancer and continue to eat away at the fortitude of a once vital nation that comprises not even 5% of the world’s population, but a far greater percentage of that worlds wealth.
Seymour Hersh is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.