Re: [Salon] Lieven: The moral cowardice of Sarkozy haters



For the record, this is the kind of analysis I appreciate from Quincy. Not when they pull in ignorant/stupid, in the Latinate sense, Conservatives like Mollie Hemingway and various other TAC/Straussian, Trumpite promoters as “foreign policy experts.” Nor when they’re campaigning “subliminally” for the likes of Trumpites Warren Davidson and Chip Roy and the rest of that hyper-militaristic Republican faction calling themselves the Orwellian inspired: Freedom Caucus.  

On Aug 31, 2023, at 7:58 AM, Kelley Vlahos via Salon <salon@listserve.com> wrote:

New from Anatol today: one might think that even those who disagree with Sarkozy’s specific recommendations would welcome the chance to hold a serious public debate on ways forward. Instead, the response from the great majority of Western (including French) politicians and commentators has followed the wearisomely familiar path of denunciations of the former president as a “Russian influencer” and “friend of Putin” whose remarks were “shameful” and “shocking.”

A survey of Western “news” reports (mostly in fact veiled and hostile opinion pieces) is interesting in this regard. Of the ten top stories about the interview resulting from a Google search, only two focused on Sarkozy's remarks themselves. All the others, in their content and headlines (like “'Shameful’ Nicolas Sarkozy Under Fire for Defending Putin” in The Guardian), highlighted and quoted at length the angry attacks on Sarkozy.

Read more here : https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/08/31/sarkozy-vilified-for-speaking-uncomfortable-truths-about-ukraine/


all the best,

Kelley




--
Salon mailing list
Salon@listserve.com
https://mlm2.listserve.net/mailman/listinfo/salon



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.