Re: [Salon] 50 years later, Chile’s coup has a disturbing number of supporters



I lived in Chile during the last year of Allende and three months after the coup.  The recent Economist piece on Chile was really well done and I recommend it for a fair evaluation of the coup and its consequences.  

There is no question that the brutality of the first year after the coup caught many in Chile off guard.  But it was effective. The dictatorship came in hard and fast.   It was jarring to listen to middle class business owners and members of the Christian Democracy defend the use of torture on family members who supported the coalition of parties with Allende.   Chile is a small county—families included folks who supported the National party, the CD, and the left.   I remember the impact of hearing that random innocent people had been arrested—not just known agitators.  That is what makes state terror work.

My own sense at the time-as outsider- was that Allende was overwhelmed by erosion in his own coalition and the powerful opposition by the right--strikes, inflation, and even shortages of toilet paper and toothpaste.  I thought there was a chance that the parliamentary system  might have been able to work its way through the challenges with a plebiscite or other accommodations to the middle.   But the symbolism of Allende was too strong to survive.

Warren notes the impact of the Chicago boys.  And I had a brief chance to see this economic approach in action.  Many business owners and other affluent Chileans had been used to a protected trade/import environment,  There was not much of a  competitive economic culture.  When the Chicago boys stripped the protectionist policies, these folks were shocked, but could not protest the change since they were strong supporters of Pinochet.  I always felt that the Chicago boys shook up the business community more than Allende did.  No doubt, Chile was quick to take advantage of “creative destruction" of competitive domestic markets, and the growing global markets, especially for food and wine… in addition to its mineral positions.   But as the Economist notes, Chile still struggles with economy disparity and political tensions. 

It is hard to believe that 50 years have passed.

Janet


On Sep 22, 2023, at 3:46 PM, Warren Coats via Salon <salon@listserve.com> wrote:

General Pinochet removed the democratically elect Marist President, Salvador Allende, in a coup fifty years ago. Under Pinochet the Chicago Boys (Chilean students at the U of Chicago under an exchange program organized by Arnold Harberger), who had nothing to do with the coup, returned to liberalize and guild the Chilean economy to become the fastest growing and most successful economy in South America.  From 1980 - 2020 annual growth in real GDP averaged 
4.9% in Chile compared to 3.1% in Columbia, 1.7% in Argentina and 1.3% Venezuela. Under Allende Chile would have looked more like Venezuela.  The different in those growth rates over 40 years is huge. Real GDP in Chile rose from annual rates of 91.2 million USD to 226.2 million while Venezuela rose from 10.2 million USD to 13.3 million USD.

Warren Coats
1211 S Eads St. #2101
Arlington VA 22202
Mobile 703 608-2975
http://wcoats.blog/  http://works.bepress.com/warren_coats/ https://twitter.com/wcoats2



On Sep 13, 2023, at 12:18 PM, Chas Freeman via Salon <salon@listserve.com> wrote:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/09/13/opinion/support-for-chile-coup-50-years-later/?p1=BGSearch_Overlay_Results

50 years later, Chile’s coup has a disturbing number of supporters

The 1973 overthrow of a democratically elected government led to disappearances, repression, and dictatorship. Today, many Chileans see it as a moment of liberation.

By Stephen Kinzer – Boston Globe - September 13, 2023

Monday was a historic day in Chile. Citizens observed the 50th anniversary of the military coup that plunged the country into a 17-year dictatorship. This was supposed to be a moment for the nation to unite in condemning the coup as an evil act that must never be repeated. It didn’t work out that way. Many Chileans, it turns out, believe the coup was justified.

President Gabriel Boric, a young leftist, embodies the view that the coup was a disastrous tragedy for which there can be no justification. But the rightist leader José Antonio Kast, who was Boric’s opponent in the 2021 election and may run again for president in 2025, admires the coup leader, General Augusto Pinochet, and sympathizes with his seizure of power in 1973.

“If he were alive, he would vote for me,” Kast mused a few years ago. “If I had met him now, we would have had a cup of tea.”

A recent public opinion poll found that 36 percent of Chileans believe Pinochet “liberated Chile from Marxism” — up from 16 percent a decade ago. Even the director of the polling company was astonished. “There should be an overwhelming majority of Chileans who denounce the dictatorship and the military coup and acknowledge that the military destroyed democracy,” she said. “That would be the normal situation in a normal country. But that’s not the case.”

The run-up to Monday’s anniversary was filled with rancor. Key organizers were forced to resign after critics charged that they were trying to turn the observance into a pro-government rally. President Boric proposed that all political leaders sign a statement pledging to defend the Constitution against “authoritarian threats” and “to confront the challenges of democracy with more democracy.” Rightists refused. Then he unveiled a National Search Plan aimed at finding the remains of more than 1,000 victims of the coup whose bodies have not been recovered. Rightist parties scorned it as a reopening of old wounds. Leftists sought to remove Pinochet’s name from the official list of former presidents. A rightist senator replied that the reason leftists revile Pinochet is that “he prevented you from establishing a Cuban regime in Chile in 1973.”

Rightist parties boycotted Monday’s commemoration of the coup. “We will not put ourselves at the service of an official truth,” one senator explained. Another senator dismissed claims of sexual abuse in Pinochet’s prisons, which have been widely documented, as “urban legend.” Former president Sebastian Piñera said blame for the coup rested not with Pinochet, who carried it out, but with the victim, President Allende, “who with a minority tried to impose a Marxist model of society.”

A judicial ruling days before Monday’s anniversary brought this political conflict into sharp relief. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of seven military officers who participated in the torture and murder of a leftist folk singer, Victor Jara, shortly after the coup. Many cheered at the ruling. Then one of the convicted officers, aged 86, committed suicide as police came to arrest him. That triggered an outpouring of sympathy and accusations that prosecuting former torturers deepens the split in Chilean society.

At least a third of Chileans evidently agree that Allende, a Marxist, was leading the country toward chaos and Communism, and that Pinochet intervened to rescue it. That contrasts with the view held today in much of the world, including the United States.

American intervention in Chile, directed by President Richard Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, was decisive in producing the coup. “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people,” Kissinger reasoned.

In the half century since then, US intervention in Chile has been widely condemned as a misguided assault that derailed a long-established democracy and resulted in intense repression. One of Kissinger’s successors, Colin Powell, called it “not a part of American history that we’re proud of.” Last month Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez visited Chile and urged the Biden administration to apologize for US actions there. “It’s very hard for us to move forward when there is this huge elephant in the room,” she said, “and a lack of trust due to that elephant in the room.”

Part of the reason increasing numbers of Chileans believe the coup was necessary may be that younger generations are not taught much about it. “Many people don’t know what happened because at home, parents didn’t want to discuss it,” a government spokesperson said. “The result of this is that unfortunately there are many people who don’t recognize how serious was this rupture of democracy and what it means for the history of our country.”

Many Chileans, however, apparently believe that Marxist ideology still threatens their country and that honoring Allende is a roundabout way of promoting that ideology. Rising crime and a stream of immigrants, mostly from Venezuela, lead some to conclude that a strong hand is more important than scrupulous respect for human rights.

“It’s a really toxic atmosphere,” lamented former president Michelle Bachelet, who was herself arrested and tortured after the 1973 coup.

Another former president, Ricardo Lagos, called the intensity of this debate unique in the world.

“Pinochet is the only dictator in Western contemporary history,” he said, “who, 50 years after his coup, is still appreciated by 30 or 40 percent of a country’s population.”


Stephen Kinzer is a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University.

 


--
Salon mailing list
Salon@listserve.com
https://mlm2.listserve.net/mailman/listinfo/salon

--
Salon mailing list
Salon@listserve.com
https://mlm2.listserve.net/mailman/listinfo/salon



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.