Re: [Salon] UN Vote on Humanitarian Truce
- To: salon@listserve.com
- Subject: Re: [Salon] UN Vote on Humanitarian Truce
- From: Chas Freeman <cwfresidence@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 15:12:24 -0400
- Authentication-results: mlm2.listserve.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="PXanpm7L"
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mlm2.listserve.net 80F9CB0858
- In-reply-to: <CANbmmQmV5NA9zeCes=i=4qQeQbeC=F3g9FtCch_RK1W+r_s2bA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <14ddbfe7-6755-4ee2-90f6-c49539503a2d@gmail.com> <2216e935-1660-4c82-a045-2e887967d8d6@gmail.com> <CANbmmQmV5NA9zeCes=i=4qQeQbeC=F3g9FtCch_RK1W+r_s2bA@mail.gmail.com>
FM: John Whitbeck
For those who may be interested, the 45 UN member states which
last night signified their indifference or lack of interest in
genocide by abstaining on the General Assembly resolution
calling for a humanitarian truce were:
Albania, Australia, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde,
Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, Georgia, Germany,
Greece, Haiti, Iceland, India, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Kiribati,
Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Monaco, Netherlands, North
Macedonia, Palau, Panama, Phillipines, Poland, Romania, San
Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, South Korea, South Sudan, Sweden,
Tunisia, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Vanuatu and
Zambia.
It is an odd bunch.
It is also clear from a closer observation of the votes, which
I could only discern last night by looking at photos of the
electronic voting boards in the General Assembly chamber, that
I was overly optimistic when writing my message below
regarding Europe's de-discrediting itself because only four EU
member states cast negative votes. In fact, only eight EU
member states cast votes in favor of a humanitarian truce --
Belgium, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal,
Slovenia and Spain. The other 19 went on the record as having
no problem with Israel's full-throttle and even intensifying
pursuit of the genocide of the Palestinian people.
The rest of mankind will reach an appropriate conclusion.
FM: John Whitbeck
Today, a few hours after Israel announced a major
intensification of its genocidal assault against the
people of Gaza and knocked out all internal and external
communications in the Strip, the UN General Assembly
voted overwhelmingly in favor of a Jordanian-moved
resolution calling for an immediate, durable and
sustained humanitarian truce in and around Gaza, the
urgent provision of the fundamental necessities to
sustain human life, notably including fuel, and the
unconditional release of hostages.
Notwithstanding the intensifying humanitarian horrors,
14 of the 193 UN member states voted against this
resolution, thereby signaling that they are opposed to
any let-up in the Israeli onslaught and fully support
Israel's publicly announced plans for a genocide verging
on extermination and a second Nakba.
In addition to Israel and its wholly-owned subsidiary,
the United States of America, the list of shame was
comprised of Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Fiji,
Guatemala, Hungary, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia,
Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay and Tonga.
An explanation for the negative votes of the Marshall
Islands, Micronesia and Nauru can be found on pages 6
and 7 of my attached essay, which was included in a book
of essays published on the 20th anniversary of the Oslo
Accords. (Palau's abstention this time took courage.)
Secretary of State Blinken must have been particularly
charming and/or persuasive during his recent visits to
Fiji, Papua New Guinea and Tonga.
The good news for Europe is that all but four European
states either voted in favor of the resolution (France)
or abstained (Germany and the UK), thereby potentially
deflecting the justified disgust and hatred of most of
mankind onto the United States.
One may, however, have questions regarding the 45
countries which signified their indifference or lack of
interest in genocide by abstaining.
Of course, this resolution will have no practical
effect. Israel is in contemptuous violation not only of
numerous Security Council resolutions, which are
supposed to be binding, but also of hundreds of General
Assembly resolutions, which are not. No one expects it
to pay any attention to this resolution. To dispel any
conceivable doubt, Israel's ambassador to the UN, who
called a few days ago for the resignation of the
Secretary-General, has today declared that the United
Nations has no legitimacy or relevance.
This resolution's sole significance is to demonstrate
yet again, as did the November 2012 vote to admit the
State of Palestine as a UN observer state (https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/12/07/the-world-has-spoken),
the degree to which the United States is divorced and
isolated from the moral and ethical conscience of
mankind.
NOTE: The fact that polls show that 66% of the
American people favor a ceasefire while only 4% of the
members of the House of Representatives (18 members) do
offers dramatic proof , if anyone were still in doubt,
that the U.S. Congress is not responsive, on this or
almost any other issue, to the wishes and interests of
the great unwashed masses of the American people but,
rather, only to the wishes and interests of those who
pay for their services or threaten to finance their
primary or general election opponents if they dare to
step out of line.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.