[Salon] Day 2 of the ICJ Genocide Hearings
 
- To: salon@listserve.com
- Subject: [Salon] Day 2 of the ICJ Genocide Hearings
- From: Chas Freeman <cwfresidence@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:05:38 -0500
- Authentication-results: mlm2.listserve.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="IrUbyfeK"
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mlm2.listserve.net 430C4B0830
FM: John Whitbeck
          
          Today's Israeli defense in the ICJ genocide case was a
          painful-to-watch flood of substantive lies and distortions
          which should be obvious anyone who has been paying attention
          to Israel's actions and publicly expressed intentions over the
          past three months and which judges who have been paying
          attention should have found insulting, objectionable and
          prejudicial to Israel's defense.
          
          Extraordinarily, the Israeli legal team argued that the Hamas
          attack of October 7 meets the legal definition of "genocide"
          and that South Africa is therefore complicit in genocide,
          while everything that Israel has done in Gaza since October 7
          has not only been in legitimate self-defense but in full
          compliance with international law, with constant attention to
          avoiding or mitigating any harm to Palestinian civilians. 
          
          However, there was one technical argument to which the Israeli
          legal team paid considerable attention which is potentially
          worrying -- that, prior to December 29, when South Africa
          submitted its application to the ICJ, there was no "dispute"
          between South Africa and Israel, as is necessary to establish
          ICJ jurisdiction in this case. 
          
          Somehow, this technical argument does not appear to have been
          an obstacle to Gambia's genocide case against Myanimar, but it
          may be Israel's best hope in this case and could be seized
          upon by any judge reluctant to anger the American and Israeli
          governments. 
          
          I would hope that no judge other than the American judge will
          be tempted to seize this escape route.
          
          If the ICJ does not decisively order all or most of the
          "provisional measures" sought by South Africa, it will, in my
          view, be definitively destroying the very concept of
          international law which Israel and the United States have done
          so much to destroy or deform in recent decades, giving a legal
          green light to continuing genocide and restoring "Might Makes
          Right" as the only functional principle of international
          relations.
          
          Much more than the potential relief of Palestinians from the
          genocidal assault currently being inflicted upon them is at
          stake in this case.
     
     This archive was generated by a fusion of 
     Pipermail (Mailman edition) and 
     MHonArc.