“That is something – for instance– we used to do extensively during the Vietnam War era,” Ritter explained. “A lot of the Air America pilots flew combat missions over Laos, where American military personnel was forbidden by Congress from operating, were American Air Force pilots who were… called into their commander’s office to be discharged from the Air Force, and then they would go into the next office where a CIA official would be… and they’d go fly their missions."
“So we’ve done that in the past, and there’s no reason for me to believe that we don’t continue to do that to this day in certain parts of the world,” he said, clarifying that he doesn’t know if Ukraine is included in that, but we do know that it provides “significant logistical support” to the Kiev regime.
Actual active-duty officers would “be difficult to see,” said Ritter, citing the legal and political constraints, but adds that contractors would be more plausible. On Friday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov alleged that there are US, UK and French troops, not just mercenaries, operating in Ukraine.
“So, we do have instances where Westerners are definitely heavily involved in the support of the Ukrainian military,” Ritter concluded.
At least in the case of the United States, Presidents are given legal cover for these actions through presidential findings which the president presents to the “small number of” lawmakers who “manage oversight committees” and says “the president is going to operate in violation of these laws, but he's notifying Congress [about it].”
Noting that in recent years the presidents have signed findings after being caught and faced no consequences, Ritter said this is a long-standing issue with the Executive Branch in the US. “No president has been held to account for things of this nature… Every [recent] president has signed multiple findings to excuse unconstitutional behavior [with] the employment of American military power.”