[Salon] And then Trump asked: Who would you like me to pick as VP? – www.israelhayom.com


  • To: SALON Admin <salon@committeefortherepublic.org>
  • Subject: [Salon] And then Trump asked: Who would you like me to pick as VP? – www.israelhayom.com
  • From: Todd Pierce <todd.e.pierce@icloud.com>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:41:23 -0700
  • Authentication-results: mlm2.listserve.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com header.i=@icloud.com header.b="aND0mNxK"
  • Authentication-results: se03.mfg.siteprotect.com; iprev=pass (ms11p00im-qufo17281501.me.com) smtp.remote-ip=17.58.38.52; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=icloud.com; dkim=pass header.d=icloud.com header.s=1a1hai header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=pass header.from=icloud.com
  • Authentication-results: mfg.siteprotect.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=todd.e.pierce@icloud.com; dkim=pass header.i=icloud.com
  • Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mlm2.listserve.net 5CAB6B0851

To understand Trumpism, and what’s in store for US foreign policy under the next Trump administration, there are “key communicators” to look to in Trumpite aligned/cognitive operation, Trumpite "think tank” and media. A major one is his most loyal media platform, Miriam Adelson’s fascist war loving Israel Hayom. Here’s what Trump had to say to them, allowing that he’s currently in a POTUS campaign, and has been for almost two years (no, elections aren’t decided in the last couple months of the campaign, but are decided long before with the “cognitive conditioning” of the voters which takes place long before). But to the degree he can, during a campaign, Trump signals to Israel Hayom here that he remains fully on-board with Israeli fascism, and will do even more this time than he did last time, as a close “textual analysis" shows here:  https://www.israelhayom.com/2024/03/29/and-then-trump-asked-who-would-you-like-me-to-pick/

"And then Trump asked: Who would you like me to pick as VP?"

"During our interview with Donald Trump he kept saying he was the most pro-Israel president ever and will continue to be if elected. He pulls no punches when it comes to Biden, but also has a critical commentary on the Jewish state. This is how our interview unfolded."

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I’ve made it clear that I’m not a fan of the Quincy Institute’s self-identified “New Right” or its Conservative wing’s promotion of that so-called “New Right” as commentators and in their events. Such as this one which so clear their “right-wing” (Trumpite) leanings. Along with Right-historical revisionism to create the mythical “Right-wing Peaceniks.” A criticism which doesn’t go to their non-right wing commentators like Eli Clifton as one example. But here, https://quincyinst.org/events/the-new-right-ukraine-marks-major-foreign-policy-shift-among-conservatives/, the most loathsome ultra-Zionists, Mollie Hemingway,  Saurabh Sharma, and TAC’s Emile Doak, promoted the latest iteration of the ZioCon New Right (though all, this one and its two predecessor “New Rights," going back to the early 1950s, are actually one continuous chain, of ultra-militaristic fanatics, at its core, when analyzed objectively, and historically. With these as example of Hemingway’s fealty and propagation of Israeli fascism under Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, and Smotrich:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/hemingway-people-need-to-understand-the-seriousness-of-efforts-to-go-after-israel
BLUF: "It's also true that people need to understand the seriousness of efforts to go after Israel and its people. And there has been a lot of tolerance of the BDS movements, boycott movements against Israel on the American left," Hemingway said. "I think it's important for people to speak out against those movements and the harm that they cause and instead of just tolerating them."

And this: https://www.foxnews.com/video/6339670220112

"Media have not taken responsibility for blaming Israel on Gaza hospital bombing: Mollie Hemingway"

(Hemingway’s apologia for Israel’s fascists, and their closest ally, Trump, begins at about 3:30)


And this by Sharma, as an outright Israeli propagandist now in his position of Executive Director of Yoram Hazony’s cognitive operation propagating the Israeli Fascist Settler ideology of National Conservatism: https://nationalconservatism.org/people/
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/11/12/palestines-right-to-self-determination-or-israels-right-to-self-defense/
Here is Sharma’s “legal reasoning,” akin to the level of Goebbel’s perhaps, justifying the attempted erasure of Poland and Czechoslovakia, et al.: 
"For invoking the element of responsibility upon Palestine for the use of force, a link has to be created between the Palestine State and the actual perpetrators. Hamas has been the de facto administrator of the Gaza Strip since 2007 which is still recognized to be a Palestinian Authority under the control of Fatah as per the Oslo Accords of 1993. However, the sole reason that these are non-State actors and the territory of Gaza has gone rogue and thus don’t derive any authority from the legal order as it exists within the Palestinian municipal legal system is not a sufficient excuse to not create an inextricable link between Hamas and Palestine considering that Palestine ought to have control over such rogue elements.” (TP- the same applies to Israel itself then as they’re who actually has sovereignty over Gaza, as maintaining total control over Gaza under the military occupation regime they have over all Palestinians.)

I won’t say more on that, trusting the knowledge that some here have to recognize the total insanity of Sharma’s claim, especially when one reads on in that article. To point out what Sharma puts out is virtually identical to what Israel’s Ministry of Strategic Affairs is putting out as propaganda is not at all a leap, to include Hemingway in that (or she wouldn’t be a regular on Fox). In Cuba, they have the honesty to call the identical type of Office, the Ministry of Propaganda, as I saw in passing by it once in Havana.

As for Doak, this celebratory TAC article makes clear his fealty to Yoram Hazony’s ideology: 
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/exclusive-natcon-is-having-an-american-moment/
"TAC's Executive Director Emile Doak said, “EBF and American Moment have long found a home in the pages of TAC, so I’m thrilled to see this new partnership. Saurabh is exactly the right person to broaden the NatCon movement’s already considerable influence.” (You see, it’s not just me saying so!)

Doak is as well a promoter of the so-called “Common Good Constitutionalism” of “Post-Liberal,” Adrian Vermeule,  a “legal theory” first seen as the German fascist Carl Schmitt’s legal theory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAfYXnAis4s

"Emile Doak | There Is No Global Common Good | NatCon 3 Miami"

For a less adulatory view of Vermeule’s recycled fascist legal theory of Carl Schmitt’s, see this: 
https://criticallegalthinking.com/2022/05/23/baptizing-the-state-vermeules-common-good/

"In this connection, the figure of Carl Schmitt who has been haunting the book inevitably appears. The hierarchical order of subsidiarity inevitably demands occasional interventions from the higher authority into the affairs of the lower orders. The state’s full power may be operationalised to concretely enforce or realise the ‘positive duties to come to the aid of – provide subsidium to – jurisdictions, institutions, societies, and corporations that are failing to carry out their work in an overall social scheme that serves the common good.’ (155) If and when such a failure happens, when the common good faces a crisis, the ordinary operation of administrative law is suspended, and a state of exception pertains. The word ‘corporation’ here includes family, locality, and professional associations – the family being the ‘vital cell’ of society in the Compendium. 

"The declaration of the exception thus mobilises ‘help’ (subsidium – a term for a Roman military reserve, taken up in the social doctrine of the Church) which has both a positive power to intervene when necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the laws, and a positive duty to refrain when unnecessary. (157-158) It mirrors what Schmitt called the commissarial dictatorship, an idea rooted in the Roman dictatorship, also found at paragraphs 187 and 188 of the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Catholic Church. According to the Compendium, such an ‘institutional substitution must not continue any longer than is absolutely necessary since justification for such intervention is found only in the exceptional nature of the situation.’ 

"Famously, Schmitt associated true sovereignty with the power to suspend the law in an emergency. In Vermeule’s book, the exception is a question for determination by the ‘highest public authority’. When invoked, it takes on the ‘strength of a giant’. Law might offer ways to ‘temper the exercise of that strength with prudence and self-restraint’, but the nature of exceptional powers is such that the criteria of the decision to declare the exception cannot be codified in advance. (164) It follows that there can be no individual rights that trump the highest authority of the state, or, in Schmitt’s terms, no rule can constrain the properly ‘political’ sovereign decision. Rights are not to be ‘balanced’ proportionately against state authority in all cases. Rights, like democratic participation itself, are derived from, and justified in relation to, participation in the common good. (165-167) In the US, this means freedom of speech, obscenity laws, and even blasphemy laws must be redefined (167-170). On the other hand, stewardship of the environment in the name of the common good – and in the name of future generations – means greatly broaden the scope of standing in relation to protection of the planet. (176-178). Everything flows from and refers itself to the good of the community – and this is the connection to the ‘critique’ of neoliberalism from the red-pilled New Right, which has a reasonably clear idea of the ‘community’ whose good it would defend." 

So now, the following question has been raised:
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/trump-israel-gaza/
Is it a Mystery? Where  Trump stands on Israel-Gaza war

His past record and 'finish it up' comments today suggest a hard line, though he leaves just a sliver of ambiguity


When in fact, Trump himself answers it fully, though “coded,” to Israel Hayom in declaring his fealty to Israel’s Fascist Right!

Not meaning as criticism, but Trump’s openness of loyalty to and co-belligerency with Israel’s Fascist Right, brings me to suggest that perhaps a “thicker analysis” of Trump’s foreign policy Plans might be in order for those sincerely against US military aggression, which always takes a leap forward under the “Right,” of either Party, but always more so under the openly “Right-wing Party.” In fact, as Willmoore Kendall made so unequivocally clear, even more extreme militarism is what distinguishes Conservatives from Liberals! 

All of the above makes it hard to understand how James Carden, whom isn’t in the "Conservative bloc,” could fail to see the lack of ambiguity in a future Trump administration, given all that Trump did to escalate war on Russia through encirclement, vast war preparations and greater military spending for weaponry designed to attack Russia (and China, Iran, . . . ), and “clandestine war” by CIA/USSOCOM against Russia, as admitted to and boasted of by former Trump officials and military officers testifying to Congress. In fact, once one deciphers ultra-militaristic “code,” and to know that Andrew Bacevich himself once made the point: 
 "belief in the efficacy of military power almost inevitably breeds the temptation to put that power to work. 'Peace through strength' easily enough becomes 'peace through war,"[32] one can’t help but wonder what happened to opposing “American Militarism” when it has risen to heights of extreme militarism and authoritarianism not seen ideologically since the 1950’s with the original New Right, of the Tratiioonal Conservatives, calling itself the New Right! Though today, more vocal for an Asia First war against China and Iran, to start with, with Russia, per US doctrine, unescapably on out target list!  

Yet Trump has been celebrated and promoted too often by the right-wing of that think tank, as a “Restrainer!” In spite of Trump promoting “Peace Through Strength as his foreign policy, as the Wikipedia "Peace Through Strength" entry notes: 
"On assuming office in January 2017, Donald Trump cited the idea of "Peace Through Strength" as central to his overall "America First" foreign policy.[30] As such the introduction to US National Defense Strategy of 2018 states: The US force posture combined with the allies will "preserve peace through strength". The document proceeds to detail what "achieving peace through strength requires".[31]"

It’s not as if Quincy doesn’t know of the Heritage Foundation writing Trump’s Mein Kampf as his foreign policy, as Project 2025: 
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/trump-foreign-policy/
No lengthy quote from this except to say: WTF!
"For supporters of a more restrained foreign policy, Project 2025 has a lot to offer. While any Heritage program is bound to make up a big tent of conservative views, “the leadership of Project 2025 is a lot more aligned to a more Trumpian strain of America First, which is a more narrow, national-interest oriented idea,” said Sumantra Maitra of the CRA, who has advised on the effort. Will Ruger, who Trump nominated as his ambassador to Afghanistan, welcomed Heritage’s shift toward a “much more prudential approach to American foreign policy.”

I’ve written plenty of criticism of the ultra-militarist foreign policy proposals of P2025 here, so I’m not going to add more. But it all goes to “Know the Source,” and their ideological biases, to interpret what any “think tank” is promoting. As with the rival extreme militarististic parties we have today, and their respective “think tanks,” it’s virtually impossible to avoid complicity in our serial war crimes, such as voting for either one of our "choices” of the War Party. But as the traditional fascist “Third Way,” the "Peace Through Strength” party/candidate of Republican/Trump is at the top of the scale today for both militarism, and duplicitous “cognitive operations.”  
Where’s the “ambiguity” in that? 

Israel Hayom excerpt from article below: 

"Good guys and bad guys

"One must remember, of course, that the real battle for Trump is not in Gaza, it's in the battleground states across America.

"On that very morning, the headlines in the US dealt with an ultimatum from a New York court to Trump, to pay a paltry sum of half a billion dollars within 24 hours, or face the seizure of his luxury assets. The threat did not seem to bother him particularly as he nonchalantly entered the library where the interview was filmed. He chatted casually with those present, examined the camera angles as mentioned, and then answered the questions as he did.

"It is quite clear that political considerations led him to speak only in general terms about the war, without committing to anything future and with some distance from Israel. Although he is completely on Israel's side as will be explained later, his interest at the moment is not to lose the lead he has opened over Biden in the Electoral College count. According to CNN polls, for example, he has already crossed the threshold of 270 electors, while Biden is struggling in the 225 range only.

"In other words, from his perspective, any sharp statement one way or the other can only detract. And if so, why say something he might later regret? Most importantly, why alienate Michigan's anti-Israel voters, who currently are not willing to go out and vote for Biden but intend to stay home? For now, Trump is slightly ahead in the swing state. Any pro-Israel statement from him could push them back into the rival's arms, and perhaps jeopardize the presidency that seems within reach. So Trump, yes Trump, is weighing his words carefully, and holding back.

"Does this mean that his actual attitude towards Israel will also be restrained if he wins? The answer is complex and consists of two parts. One, Trump has a positive feeling towards Israel. Unlike Biden and his circle, he has no progressive sympathy or compassion for the Palestinians. He understands who the good guys and bad guys are, and that's a very good starting point. In this spirit, he pledged in the interview, for example, that the vice president he runs with will be a supporter of Israel.

Q: Who will you appoint as your running mate?

"Who would you like?"

Q: We want him or her to be a supporter of Israel.

"You'll have an Israel supporter, that I promise you. Anybody that's vice president for me, will be an Israel supporter. You don't have an Israel supporter right now, you do know that. Kamala Harris is not a supporter of Israel. She's the opposite. And Biden is not a supporter of Israel...She supports the enemy, but he supports the enemy too."

"Stock in decline

"Trump believes he was the best president Israel has ever had but feels he deserves more credit. 

"It's not really reciprocal, because you know, I only got 26% of the [Jewish] vote. The first time in 2016 I got 25%. And the next time I got 26%. And the second time was more concerning because of [all the gestures toward Israel]....how a Jewish person in the United States can vote Democrat or can vote Biden is hard to believe it's almost as though they've never read a story. They've never picked up a newspaper or looked at a newsdesk… He has abandoned Israel. And he sees those marches in Illinois, and he sees those marches in Michigan and all these different marches that they see with the Palestinians. And he is absolutely not for Israel. And Schumer is not for Israel. Schumer's a Jewish guy who is not for Israel. What he did the other day with talking, you lose your spirit. And it's not a question of Bibi Netanyahu. What he did is he said, 'We want to break this thing up.' It's such a bad thing. You lose your guts, you lose your spirit, and it's hysterical I mean, we have a lot of people like Schumer, a lot of people. We have a lot of Jewish people like Schumer..look at the New York Times. It's a Jewish family. I think they hate Israel. I watch what they write in the New York Times, it's hysterical. Now the conservative Jews love Trump, I would get the highest marks I would get, I would beat anybody [with them]. They love Trump, I think they are great, and they love Israel."

"Trump clearly defines who is an enemy and who is a friend. And yet, people may have forgotten that Trump did not give Israel everything it wanted. One had to negotiate with him over construction in Judea and Samaria and convince him of the necessity of every move on the agenda. He was never a pushover, and since then he has accumulated personal resentment towards Netanyahu and has questioned Israel's conduct since the outbreak of the war. Throughout the interview, it was impossible to miss what he sees as Israel's declining share price.

"You don't have the support you used to have. Some 15 years ago, Israel had the strongest lobby. If you were a politician, you couldn't say anything bad about Israel, that would be like the end of your political career. Today, it's almost the opposite. So Israel has to get better with the promotional and with the public relations because right now they're really being hurt very badly. I think in a public relations sense."

"I think Israel made a very big mistake. I wanted to call [Israel] and say don't do it. These photos and shots. I mean, moving shots of bombs being dropped into buildings in Gaza. And I said, Oh, that's a terrible portrait. It's a very bad picture for the world. The world is seeing this…every night, I would watch buildings pour down on people. It would say it was given by the Defense Ministry, and said whoever's providing that that's a bad image."

Q: But terrorists are hiding in those buildings.

"Go and do what you have to do. But you don't do that. And I think that's one of the reasons that there has been a lot of kickback. If people didn't see that, every single night I'd watch and every single one of those... And I think Israel wanted to show that it's tough, but sometimes you shouldn't be doing that…Israel has to be very careful because you're losing a lot of the world, you're losing a lot of support, you have to finish up, you have to get the job done. And you have to get on to peace, to get on to a normal life for Israel, and for everybody else."

"If there is one thing Trump understands, it's business, public relations, and the connection between them. This is how he became one of the most famous people in America, and consequently, president. Whether he returns to office or not, his assessments should be read as a warning sign. 

"The conversation ended, and the Shabbat was approaching. The Stars and Stripes flag flew in the background. Passersby stopped at the estate's gate to take pictures, pose for photos, or shout supportive calls to the former president, who of course could not hear them. The man who had just devoted 45 minutes of his time to us will return to the presidency on January 20, or perhaps not. With his captivating personality, the deeds done and attributed to him, his unique style, and no less importantly, the issues he placed on the international agenda, he has already left his mark on history. A significant part of this legacy directly deals with Israel, despite not feeling reciprocity, as he told us. 

"For his part, Trump also taught us how a conversation with an American president is conducted, and also equipped us as Israelis with plenty of food for thought about the war and its next moves.

There was no equivocation in Trump’s support for Israeli fascist genocide, except “tactical” on how it appears “cognitively.” As an element of "Cognitive War” as the critical part of all warfare, going to the “Will” of the people to fight, or to resist, per Clausewitz’s, the IDF’s, and the USMC’s understanding of “War Fighting,” and the need to “win the hearts and minds,” of global support politically. Like expressed in the attached file below:

Attachment: 4-Low-Intensity Warfare.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document





https://www.israelhayom.com/2024/03/29/and-then-trump-asked-who-would-you-like-me-to-pick/

Monday Apr 1, 2024
 HE
 NEWSLETTER

PNG image

  • Home
  • Opinions
  • Coronavirus Outbreak
  • Middle East
  • Jewish World
  • World News
  • Magazine
  • Special Coverage
  • In Memoriam
  • more
  • Home
  • Opinions
  • Coronavirus Outbreak
  • Middle East
  • Jewish World
  • World News
  • Magazine
  • Special Coverage
  • In Memoriam
  • more
Home  Features

And then Trump asked: Who would you like me to pick as VP?

During our interview with Donald Trump he kept saying he was the most pro-Israel president ever and will continue to be if elected. He pulls no punches when it comes to Biden, but also has a critical commentary on the Jewish state. This is how our interview unfolded.

By  Omer Lachmanovitch  and Ariel Kahana 
 
 Published on  03-29-2024 10:43
 Last modified: 03-29-2024 11:27

JPEG image

Former President Donald Trump during the interview | Photo: Ami Shooman

 

An umbrella for half a minute? Only 50 yards separate the gate of Donald J. Trump's magnificent estate from the guest reception area. From those 50 yards to a gate behind an enormous American flag was visible.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

The strict security instructions we received two weeks before the interview made it clear that we would have to walk this short distance. But now, it was pouring rain. And so, hours before meeting the 45th president, we suddenly realized that we might reach him with our clothes drenched in water. And with all due respect to Israeli sloppy attire, this would have been too disrespectful.

This is how it happened in the final tense hours last Friday before we left the hotel in West Palm Beach for Mar-a-Lago, our heads were preoccupied with the question of where to get umbrellas here and now. In the end, a local Walmart solved the problem. After all, this is America.

Video: The interview with Former US President Donald Trump

These tiny details of the interview were essential since this was not just another "question-answer" with an American politician, but rather a complex journalistic and logistical operation, because Mar-a-Lago is not a typical office or standard home of an American senior official, but rather a strange combination of both, along with an operational golf club and restaurant. The faucets, chairs, and other items are painted in Trump's favorite gold color. The shiny parquet floor, high ceiling, plush sofas, and waiters rushing back and forth exuded the aura of a royal palace. 

At one point the signal was given and all the furniture was cleared to the side, in order to prepare the compound for a party held after our departure. On the walls, even in the bathrooms, hung pictures and paintings of Trump from various stages of his life, including with his late father. As is well known, our interviewee does not suffer from a lack of self-esteem.

All this took place while from the early morning hours, a five-person film and recording crew in the adjacent library room began meticulously aligning the camera angles, lighting intensity, chair positioning, and other minutiae that only they saw. They and Trump. When the former president sat across from us at five in the afternoon, he devoted the first minute to examining how the conversation would look on screen. The man is, after all, a media creature with decades of experience. "Looks good," he said after long seconds of watching the monitor setup behind our backs displaying the interview. Only when he was satisfied with what he saw was the signal given to start the conversation.

J'Accuse 

We asked questions. Trump answered, in his way. Because in the whole world, there is no other politician who speaks in his language and manner. He uses words like "incompetent," "stupid," "dumb," "Biden is the worst president ever," and so on. People his age (78) have long stopped speaking like that. But to the American public, or at least half of it, this style resonates. And yet, it's one thing to see such statements on a television screen, and quite another to hear them face-to-face from a former president sitting across from you. Trump also did not hesitate to jump between subjects in contexts that were not always clear mid-conversation. And what else was clear: Trump chose to speak about Israel's war only in general terms. He refrained from saying anything that would box him in about it. 

When we asked, "Do you agree with Israel's goal of completely destroying Hamas?"He responded that "only a fool or a crazy person would have not responded the way you did," Adding that if he had been in the Oval Office, the war would not have broken out on Oct. 7.  "They would have never, ever done that [if I were president], for two reasons: number one, they were broke. and number two, when I was the president, they would have never done that, because they knew there would have been very big consequences. 

Although it is very difficult to determine "what would have happened if "in history, in this case there is reason to assume he is right. After all, it is clear that Biden and his people projected American weakness around the globe, particularly toward Iran. Instead of putting it in its place, they allowed it to inch closer to acquiring nuclear weapons, took the threat of military action off the table, pumped billions of dollars into Tehran, and begged the ayatollahs for a new nuclear deal that never materialized. The flaccid message was well received in the Middle East.

"It [Oct. 7] was an attack that I blame on Biden because they [Hamas] have no respect for him. He can't put two sentences together. He can't talk. He's a very dumb person. He's a dumb person. His foreign policy throughout 50 years has been horrible. If you look at people that were in other administrations with him, they saw him as a weak, ineffective president, they [Hamas] would have never done that attack if I were there," he said of his rival.

But when we tried in other ways to elicit a clear statement from him about an Israeli victory or the destruction of Hamas, he used his own way. "You have to finish up your war. To finish it up. You gotta get it done. And, I am sure you will do that. And we gotta get to peace, we can't have this going on."

It is true that, unlike President Biden, Trump, at least in his conversation with us, refrained from explicitly stating that "Hamas must be defeated", but to Israeli ears, it is clear that the words "finish the job" mean agreeing with the overarching goal of the war.

Q: If you get reelected, and the war might still be ongoing, how will you act?

There has been no president better to Israel than me. because of the Golan Heights [recognition by the US], the Abraham Accords. If Obama did the Abraham Accords, you would have gotten 15 Nobel Peace prizes. I got nothing. I've been loyal to Israel, I've been the best president in history by a factor of 10 to Israel, because of all the things I do. The embassy in Jerusalem being the capital, is the best location for the embassy and getting the embassy built. The biggest thing I did was the Iran nuclear deal. I ended it. The problem is that Biden didn't do anything with it."

Q: What should be done now with Iran, now that they are so close to the bomb? 

"Well, I don't want to tell you that. Because I don't think it's appropriate for me to tell you, but I don't think you can allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. I don't think it's my position right now to be telling you that but I would tell you this – I was very strong on Iran not having a nuclear weapon to a point where they … literally had no money. " 

He then went on to say that Iran was only 35 days away from a bomb, once a decision was made. 

Q: They will not have a nuclear bomb if you are president? 

"They will never have a nuclear weapon no. They can have a nuclear weapon in 35 days. I have seven months to go, and nine months to take office. A lot of bad things can happen in that period. That's a lot. That's like an eternity. Seven months in this world, and especially in the Middle East, where it's so and so combative, and so combustible, that's a long period of time, so many bad things can happen. And also, so many good things can happen. If we had a real president, if we had a president that knew what he was doing, who could put two sentences together, that could get solved very quickly."

Good guys and bad guys

One must remember, of course, that the real battle for Trump is not in Gaza, it's in the battleground states across America.

On that very morning, the headlines in the US dealt with an ultimatum from a New York court to Trump, to pay a paltry sum of half a billion dollars within 24 hours, or face the seizure of his luxury assets. The threat did not seem to bother him particularly as he nonchalantly entered the library where the interview was filmed. He chatted casually with those present, examined the camera angles as mentioned, and then answered the questions as he did.

It is quite clear that political considerations led him to speak only in general terms about the war, without committing to anything future and with some distance from Israel. Although he is completely on Israel's side as will be explained later, his interest at the moment is not to lose the lead he has opened over Biden in the Electoral College count. According to CNN polls, for example, he has already crossed the threshold of 270 electors, while Biden is struggling in the 225 range only.

 In other words, from his perspective, any sharp statement one way or the other can only detract. And if so, why say something he might later regret? Most importantly, why alienate Michigan's anti-Israel voters, who currently are not willing to go out and vote for Biden but intend to stay home? For now, Trump is slightly ahead in the swing state. Any pro-Israel statement from him could push them back into the rival's arms, and perhaps jeopardize the presidency that seems within reach. So Trump, yes Trump, is weighing his words carefully, and holding back.

Does this mean that his actual attitude towards Israel will also be restrained if he wins? The answer is complex and consists of two parts. One, Trump has a positive feeling towards Israel. Unlike Biden and his circle, he has no progressive sympathy or compassion for the Palestinians. He understands who the good guys and bad guys are, and that's a very good starting point. In this spirit, he pledged in the interview, for example, that the vice president he runs with will be a supporter of Israel.

Q: Who will you appoint as your running mate?

"Who would you like?"

Q: We want him or her to be a supporter of Israel.

"You'll have an Israel supporter, that I promise you. Anybody that's vice president for me, will be an Israel supporter. You don't have an Israel supporter right now, you do know that. Kamala Harris is not a supporter of Israel. She's the opposite. And Biden is not a supporter of Israel...She supports the enemy, but he supports the enemy too."

Stock in decline

Trump believes he was the best president Israel has ever had but feels he deserves more credit. 

"It's not really reciprocal, because you know, I only got 26% of the [Jewish] vote. The first time in 2016 I got 25%. And the next time I got 26%. And the second time was more concerning because of [all the gestures toward Israel]....how a Jewish person in the United States can vote Democrat or can vote Biden is hard to believe it's almost as though they've never read a story. They've never picked up a newspaper or looked at a newsdesk… He has abandoned Israel. And he sees those marches in Illinois, and he sees those marches in Michigan and all these different marches that they see with the Palestinians. And he is absolutely not for Israel. And Schumer is not for Israel. Schumer's a Jewish guy who is not for Israel. What he did the other day with talking, you lose your spirit. And it's not a question of Bibi Netanyahu. What he did is he said, 'We want to break this thing up.' It's such a bad thing. You lose your guts, you lose your spirit, and it's hysterical I mean, we have a lot of people like Schumer, a lot of people. We have a lot of Jewish people like Schumer..look at the New York Times. It's a Jewish family. I think they hate Israel. I watch what they write in the New York Times, it's hysterical. Now the conservative Jews love Trump, I would get the highest marks I would get, I would beat anybody [with them]. They love Trump, I think they are great, and they love Israel."

Trump clearly defines who is an enemy and who is a friend. And yet, people may have forgotten that Trump did not give Israel everything it wanted. One had to negotiate with him over construction in Judea and Samaria and convince him of the necessity of every move on the agenda. He was never a pushover, and since then he has accumulated personal resentment towards Netanyahu and has questioned Israel's conduct since the outbreak of the war. Throughout the interview, it was impossible to miss what he sees as Israel's declining share price.

"You don't have the support you used to have. Some 15 years ago, Israel had the strongest lobby. If you were a politician, you couldn't say anything bad about Israel, that would be like the end of your political career. Today, it's almost the opposite. So Israel has to get better with the promotional and with the public relations because right now they're really being hurt very badly. I think in a public relations sense."

"I think Israel made a very big mistake. I wanted to call [Israel] and say don't do it. These photos and shots. I mean, moving shots of bombs being dropped into buildings in Gaza. And I said, Oh, that's a terrible portrait. It's a very bad picture for the world. The world is seeing this…every night, I would watch buildings pour down on people. It would say it was given by the Defense Ministry, and said whoever's providing that that's a bad image."

Q: But terrorists are hiding in those buildings.

"Go and do what you have to do. But you don't do that. And I think that's one of the reasons that there has been a lot of kickback. If people didn't see that, every single night I'd watch and every single one of those... And I think Israel wanted to show that it's tough, but sometimes you shouldn't be doing that…Israel has to be very careful because you're losing a lot of the world, you're losing a lot of support, you have to finish up, you have to get the job done. And you have to get on to peace, to get on to a normal life for Israel, and for everybody else."

If there is one thing Trump understands, it's business, public relations, and the connection between them. This is how he became one of the most famous people in America, and consequently, president. Whether he returns to office or not, his assessments should be read as a warning sign. 

The conversation ended, and the Shabbat was approaching. The Stars and Stripes flag flew in the background. Passersby stopped at the estate's gate to take pictures, pose for photos, or shout supportive calls to the former president, who of course could not hear them. The man who had just devoted 45 minutes of his time to us will return to the presidency on January 20, or perhaps not. With his captivating personality, the deeds done and attributed to him, his unique style, and no less importantly, the issues he placed on the international agenda, he has already left his mark on history. A significant part of this legacy directly deals with Israel, despite not feeling reciprocity, as he told us. 

For his part, Trump also taught us how a conversation with an American president is conducted, and also equipped us as Israelis with plenty of food for thought about the war and its next moves.

Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!

 

Tags: Gaza War 2023
.
Recommended by

image/svg

 
Recommended by

Related Posts

The man in charge of AI in Israel predicts professions will disappear – but no mass unemployment

The man in charge of AI in Israel predicts professions will disappear – but no mass unemployment

By Hodaya Karish-Hazony/Makor Rishon
 

Why won’t it actually do away with our jobs? How can we prevent it from perpetuating social gaps? And when...

Trump to Israel Hayom: Only a fool would have not acted like Israel on Oct. 7

Trump to Israel Hayom: Only a fool would have not acted like Israel on Oct. 7

By Omer Lachmanovitch and Ariel Kahana
 
 

In an exclusive interview, the 45th president blames Joe Biden for the war in Israel. "He can't talk. He's a...

Saudi normalization should not come at the expense of Israel's top priority: Preventing a bad Iran deal

'Iran must be struck systematically now'

By Shirit Avitan Cohen
 

Israeli sources are increasingly concerned that we are being left to our own devices when it comes to Iran. According...

 

Latest articles

Senior IRGC general reportedly killed in Damascus embassy strike

Senior IRGC general reportedly killed in Damascus embassy strike

 04-01-2024 17:53
Israel reportedly agrees to release 700 prisoners amid ongoing talks

Why has the IDF not updated its reserve registry in the wake of the war?

 04-01-2024 16:25
IDF review of Gaza aid convoy deaths finds most killed in stampede

i24NEWS: Israel has Hamas testimonies aid truck disaster not caused by IDF

 04-01-2024 16:22
Home  Features

Trump to Israel Hayom: Only a fool would have not acted like Israel on Oct. 7

In an exclusive interview, the 45th president blames Joe Biden for the war in Israel. "He can't talk. He's a very dumb person. He's a dumb person. His foreign policy throughout 50 years has been horrible. If you look at people that were in other administrations with him, they saw him as a weak, ineffective president, they [Hamas] would have never done that attack if I were there." Speaking from his Florida home, he expresses disappointment with Jews who do not support him: "They hate Israel."

By  Omer Lachmanovitch  and Ariel Kahana 
 
 Published on  03-25-2024 16:01
 Last modified: 03-28-2024 08:56
Trump to Israel Hayom: Only a fool would have not acted like Israel on Oct. 7

Former President Donald Trump during the interview | Photo: Ami Shooman

 

Israel, Iran, Biden, Harris, and the Jewish vote. In a no-holds-barred interview, former US President Donald Trump told Israel Hayom that he supports Israel's defensive war against Hamas and said he would have responded to the October 7 attack in a very similar way. He added that "what I saw October 7 was one of the saddest things I've ever seen," but says Israel should draw the fighting to a close. "You have to finish up your war. To finish it up. You gotta get it done. And, I am sure you will do that. And we gotta get to peace, we can't have this going on. And I will say, Israel has to be very careful, because you're losing a lot of the world, you're losing a lot of support, you have to finish up, you have to get the job done. And you have to get on to peace, to get on to a normal life for Israel, and for everybody else."

Video: The interview with Former US President Donald Trump

He noted that the dragging on of the war could hurt Israel because of the footage coming out of Gaza.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

The exclusive and special interview with Israel Hayom took place over the past weekend at Mar-a-Lago, in Palm Beach, Florida. It focused primarily on the war, President Joe Biden's handling of it, and the next steps that Trump believes should be taken.

Video: The interview with Former US President Donald Trump

Q: I want to present you with a question I think every world leader has to answer. How would you react if your children or grandchildren were kidnapped by Hamas and underwent the same atrocities many Israelis have experienced since Oct. 7? 

"I would say I would act very much the same way as you did. You would have to be crazy not to. Only a fool would not do that. That was a horrible attack."

Q: We have seen a major rise in antisemitic attacks since Oct. 7. What are you going to do about it?

"Well, that's because you fought back. And I think Israel made a very big mistake. I wanted to call [Israel] and say don't do it. These photos and shots. I mean, moving shots of bombs being dropped into buildings in Gaza. And I said, Oh, that's a terrible portrait. It's a very bad picture for the world. The world is seeing this…every night, I would watch buildings pour down on people. It would say it was given by  the Defense Ministry, and said whoever's providing that that's a bad image."

Q: But terrorists are hiding in those buildings.

"Go and do what you have to do. But you don't do that. And I think that's one of the reasons that there has been a lot of kickback. If people didn't see that, every single night I'd watch and every single one of those... And I think Israel wanted to show that it's tough, but sometimes you shouldn't be doing that. "

Q: Senator Chuck Schumer, just two weeks ago, called Israelis to go to the polls and change the government. And on top of that, we see, I would say daily interference by the administration. What do you think about what Schumer said about Biden's support, or lack thereof, for Israel?

"I think it's a terrible thing to do, because it takes all of your momentum away, because they watch, and they watch the government, they watch the people what's going on. And it shows great division in the United States, you have to have support. And you don't have the support you used to have. Some 15 years ago, Israel had the strongest lobby. If you were a politician, you couldn't say anything bad about Israel, that would be like the end of your political career. Today, it's almost the opposite. I've never seen, you have AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) plus three, these lunatics, frankly. But you have AOC plus three plus plenty of others. And all they do is talk badly about Israel, and they hate Israel, and they hate the Jewish people. And they are open about it. Take a look at some of these, Rashida Tlaib, what she says the way she talks, and they truly hate the Jewish people. And 15 years ago, that would have been unthinkable to be doing that. So Israel has to get, Israel has to get better with the promotional and with the public relations, because right now they're really, they're being hurt very badly. I think in a public relations sense."

Trump, who recently secured the Republican nomination for president, is leading in the polls but has given only a few interviews since. However, he agreed to grant an interview to Israel Hayom in the library of his estate, where he spoke at length on the race against his successor. Trump harshly attacked Biden over his treatment of Israel.

"It [Oct. 7] was an attack that I blame on Biden because they [Hamas] have no respect for him. He can't put two sentences together. He can't talk. He's a very dumb person. He's a dumb person. His foreign policy throughout 50 years has been horrible. If you look at people that were in other administrations with him, they saw him as a weak, ineffective president, they [Hamas] would have never done that attack if I were there."

Trump touted the many historic steps he took as president in 2017-2021 for Israel: The Abraham Accords between Israel and four Arab countries, recognizing the Golan Heights as Israeli sovereign territory, recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital, and moving the embassy there. According to Trump, "The biggest thing I did was the Iran nuclear deal. I ended it."

Trump explained that during his presidency, Iran's economy collapsed due to the sanctions he imposed on it. 

"I said to many nations, 47 nations, I spoke to many of them personally, 'If you buy oil from Iran, you will not do any business in the United States, and we're going to tariff your products. Every single one of them agreed, I didn't lose one, not one. Iran did almost no oil business, you know that nobody would buy oil because of me, they were broke, they had no money for Hamas they had no money for Hezbollah, they had no money for anybody. And now they're sitting with $221 billion in cash. And they control Iraq which has $300 billion in cash. It's like a subsidiary, whether you like it or not, it's like a subsidiary because stupidly, the United States went in and blew everything up…and number two if I was the president, they [Hamas] would have never done that, because they knew there would have been very big consequences. That being said, you have to finish up your war. To finish it up. Iran is 35 days away from having a nuclear weapon because of the incompetence of Biden; he is an incompetent president. He's the worst president our country's ever had. And it's so sad when I see what's happening in Israel and Ukraine and other places."

Q: What should be done now with Iran, now that they are so close to the bomb? 

"Well, I don't want to tell you that. Because I don't think it's appropriate for me to tell you, but I don't think you can allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. I don't think it's my position right now to be telling you that but I would tell you this – I was very strong on Iran not having a nuclear weapon to a point where they … literally had no money. "

A significant portion of the conversation was dedicated by the former President to harsh attacks on his rival, Joe Biden. "He can't put two sentences together," Trump said. "Remember this, Biden is not a friend of Israel. Because if Biden was a friend of Israel, October 7 would have never happened. Forget about what happened after October 7. October 7 would have never happened if you had a friend named Biden, because if you had the proper president, that would have never happened."

Q: Do you have any plans to visit Israel? 

"I would love to. I was treated very well there. In Israel, they say if I ran for office in Israel I'd get 98% of the vote. Not here we have a lot of people in the United States who are Jewish but they actually fight Israel, look at the New York Times. It's a Jewish family. I think they hate Israel. I watch what they write in the New York Times, it's hysterical. Now the conservative Jews love Trump, I would get the highest marks I would get  I would beat anybody [with them] they love Trump I think they are great, and they love Israel."

Q: You have been critical over the years of Jewish Democrats who don't support you. Perhaps now with the rise of antisemitism and the war, which has made them care more about Israel, you have something new to say that could convince them. 

"I think if you have to convince them, you got a problem because that should be automatic. I'm not Jewish. And yet Israel for me is very important."

Q: Vice President Kamala Harris' stepdaughter has tried to raise funds for UNRWA. What do you think about this? 

"How could a Jewish person vote for Kamala Harris? And essentially, you know, that's what probably is going to happen because you look at this guy [Biden], he can't walk down a flight of stairs, he can't walk across a room. He can't find the exit to a stage without five different sets of stairs. You might have Kamala Harris if this doesn't work out. Something happens to him and you have her. She supports the enemy, but he supports the enemy too."

Trump also made sure to mention his record on Israel while president during the interview. "I was the best president in the history of Israel. But there's never been a president and mostly anybody whether it's a president, nobody did for Israel what I did for Israel, including defense, including billions and billions of dollars a year $4 billion a year for years, when other people wanted to cut it off. But I will say that Israel's in trouble right now it's in trouble. It's a very troubled place. An attack happened that should have never been allowed to happen, both from the Israeli standpoint and from the United States standpoint. If they respected our president, which they don't, they have no respect for him whatsoever. That's why it wouldn't have happened with me. But I say just be strong. Be smart. And let's get this over with and when it's over with, you're going to be back to having a great life."

He added that he wished Israel could move beyond the tragedy of Oct. 7. 

"Look, I know Israel, very well. Spent a lot of time there. And I have a lot of friends there. tremendous number of friends here. They're incredible people. It's an incredible place. You have to finish up what you want this through. We gotta get back to having that country again. The way it was so sad that this could have happened. The date of October 7 is gonna go down as such a terrible thing to happen, and it bothers me so much when I see people, they don't talk about the October 7 thing, they talk about how aggressive Israel is. It's amazing that they're not talking about October 7. And what we're going to talk about, they don't want to talk about it, when I talk about it, people don't want to hear about it."

Q: Why don't they want to hear about it? 

"You have a lot of a lot of people on the outside that are not friendly to Israel, and they're never going to be friendly to Israel. And you have to be very careful. You're in a very treacherous neighborhood that's a little on the dangerous side, but they're in a very dangerous neighborhood. And with Iran getting a nuclear weapon, once they have a nuclear weapon, you'll be speaking to them a lot differently than you speaking right now. They would have never had a nuclear weapon with me."

Q: They will not have a nuclear bomb if you are president? 

"They will never have a nuclear weapon no. They can have a nuclear weapon in 35 days. I have seven months to go, and nine months to take office. A lot of bad things can happen in that period. That's a lot. That's like an eternity. Seven months in this world, and especially in the Middle East, where it's so and so combative, and so combustible, that's a long period of time, so many bad things can happen. And also, so many good things can happen. If we had a real president, if we had a president that knew what he was doing, who could put two sentences together, that could get solved very quickly."

The full interview will be published in the coming days.

Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!

 

Tags: Donald Trump

Related Posts

The man in charge of AI in Israel predicts professions will disappear – but no mass unemployment

The man in charge of AI in Israel predicts professions will disappear – but no mass unemployment

By Hodaya Karish-Hazony/Makor Rishon
 

Why won’t it actually do away with our jobs? How can we prevent it from perpetuating social gaps? And when...

Trump to Israel Hayom: Only a fool would have not acted like Israel on Oct. 7

And then Trump asked: Who would you like me to pick as VP?

By Omer Lachmanovitch and Ariel Kahana
 

During our interview with Donald Trump he kept saying he was the most pro-Israel president ever and will continue to...

Saudi normalization should not come at the expense of Israel's top priority: Preventing a bad Iran deal

'Iran must be struck systematically now'

By Shirit Avitan Cohen
 

Israeli sources are increasingly concerned that we are being left to our own devices when it comes to Iran. According...

 

Latest articles

Senior IRGC general reportedly killed in Damascus embassy strike

Senior IRGC general reportedly killed in Damascus embassy strike

 04-01-2024 17:53
Israel reportedly agrees to release 700 prisoners amid ongoing talks

Why has the IDF not updated its reserve registry in the wake of the war?

 04-01-2024 16:25
IDF review of Gaza aid convoy deaths finds most killed in stampede

i24NEWS: Israel has Hamas testimonies aid truck disaster not caused by IDF

 04-01-2024 16:22

Newsletter

Sign up for our daily newsletter, delivered to your inbox
SUBSCRIBE

Menu

Terms of use

Submissions

Contact Us

About Us

The first issue of Israel Hayom appeared on July 30, 2007. Israel Hayom was founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better, more balanced and more accurate journalism. Journalism that speaks, not shouts. Journalism of a different kind. And free of charge.

All rights reserved to  Israel Hayom

Hosted by sPD.co.il 

  • Home
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Analysis
  • Jewish World
  • Middle East
  • World News
  • Magazine

All rights reserved to  Israel Hayom

Hosted by sPD.co.il 


  • Previous by Date: [Salon] Khamenei Vows Israel Will Be ‘Punished’ for Bombing Iran’s Syria Consulate
  • Next by Date: [Salon] Putin ally Patrushev says NATO is helping attacks on Russia from Ukraine
  • Previous by Thread: [Salon] Israel’s war, Netanyahu’s gamble
  • Next by Thread: [Salon] ‘Only Way to Achieve Peace’ – Spain to Recognize Palestinian State by July
  • Salon 2 April 2024 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
  • Salon list archive Table of Contents
  • More information about the Salon mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.