[Salon] Iranian retaliation and the cycle of violence in the Middle East
- To: salon@listserve.com
- Subject: [Salon] Iranian retaliation and the cycle of violence in the Middle East
- From: Chas Freeman <cwfresidence@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 10:14:41 -0400
- Authentication-results: mlm2.listserve.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="CgetQJO6"
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mlm2.listserve.net B18A1B0851
FM: John Whitbeck
The world may ... or may not ... have dodged a bullet.
Whatever one's view of the Iranian regime, one must give it
credit for subtle sophistication in structuring its response
to Israel's deadly attack on its consulate in Damascus, which
could not have been allowed to go without a response.
It has executed a response which was significant in its scale
but essentially symbolic and performative in its results,
targeting exclusively Israeli military installations and
advising the United States and Israel in advance what it would
be doing and when it would be doing it, thereby ensuring that
the Israeli and American air defense systems would be well
prepared to intercept virtually all the drones and missiles
launched toward Israel.
Indeed, Israel claims to have successfully intercepted 99% of
Iran's drones and missiles and, so far, to have suffered only
minor physical damage, no deaths and only one injury --
incontestably, an impressive performance by the Israeli and
American air defense systems.
To his credit, President Biden is reported to have advised
Prime Minister Netanyahu to "take the win" represented by
Israel's highly successful defense and not to retaliate for
this Iranian retaliation by attacking Iran and, significantly,
to have told him that the United States would not participate
in any further attack upon Iranian territory.
If the decision-makers of the Israeli government were rational
people, they would, exceptionally, accept this American
advice, trumpet their successful defense against the wave of
hundreds of Iranian drones and missiles and luxuriate in the
fervent Western condemnations of Iran's recklessness.
However, since the decision-makers of the Israeli government
are not rational people and the clear intention of attacking
an Iranian diplomatic mission was to provoke a broader
regional war and draw the United States into war with Iran, it
is far from certain that these decision-makers will view last
night's events as a "win".
If Israel were to ignore the American advice, the next round
of Iranian retaliation would be unlikely to be equally
symbolic, performative and pre-advised but could well be
viewed by these decision-makers as a "win" for them personally
even if it were to be catastrophic for everyone else.
Israel's defense minister has said this morning that Israel's
confrontation with Iran was "not yet over."
The world must still hold its breath.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.