[Salon] Leaked Cables Show White House Opposes Palestinian Statehood
- To: salon@listserve.com
- Subject: [Salon] Leaked Cables Show White House Opposes Palestinian Statehood
- From: Chas Freeman <cwfresidence@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:40:06 -0400
- Authentication-results: mlm2.listserve.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gXvna1Xo"
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mlm2.listserve.net 60ED1B0851
FM: John Whitbeck
The UN Security Council's vote on upgrading the UN status of
the State of Palestine has now been postponed until
tomorrow, at 1500 New York time (1900 GMT).
As reported in the INTERCEPT article at the link transmitted
below, the U.S. government, having failed in its effort to
browbeat President Mahmoud Abbas into withdrawing
Palestine's status upgrade application (https://www.alquds.com/en/posts/117173),
has, unsurprisingly, been offering inducements and
threatening punishments to council members to try to limit
the number of affirmative votes to eight, thereby sparing
the U.S. from the embarrassment and self-humiliation of
technically vetoing Palestine's application. Indeed, the
American effort to do so may explain the delay in the vote.
https://theintercept.com/2024/04/17/united-nations-biden-palestine-statehood
This American effort should be a serious challenge, since
eight of the current council members have extended
diplomatic recognition to the State of Palestine, three
(France, Japan and Switzerland) voted in 2012 to upgrade
Palestine's UN status to observer state, thereby
accepting that Palestine meets the international law
criteria for state status, and one (Slovenia) has recently
announced its intention to extend diplomatic recognition to
the State of Palestine.
Unfortunately, like most aspects of international relations
in recent decades, this vote will not be about legality or
morality. It will be about power and fear.
The ultimate question in tomorrow's vote is whether, if
there were to be at least nine affirmative votes in favor of
Palestine, so that the only obstacle to Palestine's full UN
membership would be a negative vote by the United States,
the U.S. government would dare to further outrage most of
mankind by vetoing Palestine.
While most commentators assume that a veto would be
inevitable, I persist in harboring a slim hope that,
particularly since the U.S. House of Representatives is
likely to vote on Saturday to make a further tribute payment
to Israel of $26 BILLION (double the amount
originally sought by President Biden) to help finance
Israel's genocidal assault against the Palestinian people,
which would constitute a breathtaking display of contempt
for international law and international public opinion, the
U.S. government might stun the world by not
daring, at the same time, to veto Palestine at the United
Nations.
If the U.S. government does succeed in blocking Palestine's
application, whether by inducements and threats or by a
veto, this will constitute yet more evidence that the
balance of power and fear in the Israeli-American
relationship overwhelmingly favors Israel, with the
purchased and/or frightened American political class not
even considering the interests of their own country and
people (or even recent opinion polls) but, rather, simply
taking orders and paying tribute (https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/05/12/its-not-american-aid-to-israel-its-tribute).
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.