Blinken Is Sitting on Staff Recommendations to Sanction Israeli Military Units Linked to Killings or Rapes
A special State Department panel
told Secretary of State Antony Blinken that the U.S. should restrict
arms sales to Israeli military units that have been credibly accused of
human rights abuses. He has not taken any action.
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.
A special State Department
panel recommended months ago that Secretary of State Antony Blinken
disqualify multiple Israeli military and police units from receiving
U.S. aid after reviewing allegations that they committed serious human
rights abuses.
But Blinken has failed to
act on the proposal in the face of growing international criticism of
the Israeli military’s conduct in Gaza, according to current and former
State Department officials.
The incidents under review
mostly took place in the West Bank and occurred before Hamas’ Oct. 7
attack on Israel. They include reports of extrajudicial killings by the
Israeli Border Police; an incident in which a battalion gagged,
handcuffed and left an elderly Palestinian American man for dead; and an
allegation that interrogators tortured and raped a teenager who had
been accused of throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails.
Recommendations for action
against Israeli units were sent to Blinken in December, according to one
person familiar with the memo. “They’ve been sitting in his briefcase
since then,” another official said.
A State Department
spokesperson told ProPublica the agency takes its commitment to uphold
U.S. human rights laws seriously. “This process is one that demands a
careful and full review,” the spokesperson said, “and the department
undergoes a fact-specific investigation applying the same standards and
procedures regardless of the country in question.”
The revelations about
Blinken’s failure to act on the recommendations come at a delicate
moment in U.S.-Israel relations. Six months into its war against Hamas,
whose militants massacred 1,200 Israelis and kidnapped 240 more on Oct.
7, the Israeli military has killed more than 33,000 Palestinians,
according to local authorities. Recently, President Joe Biden has
signaled increased frustration with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu and the widespread civilian casualties.
Multiple State Department
officials who have worked on Israeli relations said that Blinken’s
inaction has undermined Biden’s public criticism, sending a message to
the Israelis that the administration was not willing to take serious
steps.
The recommendations came
from a special committee of State Department officials known as the
Israel Leahy Vetting Forum. The panel, made up of Middle East and human
rights experts, is named for former Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the chief
author of 1997 laws that requires the U.S. to cut off assistance to any
foreign military or law enforcement units — from battalions of soldiers
to police stations — that are credibly accused of flagrant human rights
violations.
The Guardian reported this year that the State Department was reviewing
several of the incidents but had not imposed sanctions because the U.S.
government treats Israel with unusual deference. Officials told
ProPublica that the panel ultimately recommended that the secretary of
state take action.
This story is drawn from
interviews with present and former State Department officials as well as
government documents and emails obtained by ProPublica. The officials
spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal
deliberations.
The Israeli government did not respond to a request for comment.
Over the years, hundreds
of foreign units, including from Mexico, Colombia and Cambodia, have
been blocked from receiving any new aid. Officials say enforcing the
Leahy Laws can be a strong deterrent against human rights abuses.
Human rights organizations
tracking Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attacks have collected
eyewitness testimony and videos posted by Israeli soldiers that point to
widespread abuses in Gaza and the West Bank.
“If we had been applying
Leahy effectively in Israel like we do in other countries, maybe you
wouldn’t have the IDF filming TikToks of their war crimes now because we
have contributed to a culture of impunity,” said Josh Paul, a former
director in the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs
and a member of the vetting forum. Paul resigned in protest shortly
after Israel began its bombing campaign of Gaza in October.
The Leahy Laws apply to
countries that receive American-funded training or arms. In the decades
after the passage of those laws, the State Department, under both
Democratic and Republican administrations, followed a de facto policy of
exempting billions of dollars of foreign military financing to Israel
from their strictures, according to multiple experts on the region.
In 2020, Leahy and others
in Congress passed a law to tighten the oversight. The State Department
set up the vetting forum to identify Israeli security force units that
shouldn’t be receiving American assistance. Until now, it has been
paralyzed by its bureaucracy, failing to fulfill the hopes of its
sponsors.
Critics have long assailed
what they view as Israel’s special treatment. Incidents that would have
disqualified units in other countries did not have the same result in
Israel, according to Charles Blaha, the former director of the State
Department’s Office of Security and Human Rights and a former
participant in the Israeli vetting forum. “There is no political will,”
he said.
Typically, the reports of
wrongdoing come from nongovernment organizations like Human Rights Watch
or from press accounts. The State Department officials determining
whether to recommend sanctions generally do not draw on the vast array
of classified material gathered by America’s intelligence agencies.
Actions against an Israeli
unit are subject to additional layers of scrutiny. The forum is
required to consult the government of Israel. Then, if the forum agrees
that there is credible evidence of a human rights violation, the issue
goes to more senior officials, including some of the department’s top
diplomats who oversee the Middle East and arms transfers. Then the
recommendations can be sent to the secretary of state for final
approval, either with consensus or as split decisions.
Even if Blinken were to
approve the sanctions, officials said, Israel could blunt their impact.
One approach would be for the country to buy American arms with its own
funds and give them to the units that had been sanctioned. Officials
said the symbolism of calling out Israeli units for misconduct would
nonetheless be potent, marking a sign of disapproval of the civilian
toll the war is taking.
Since it was formed in
2020, the forum has reviewed reports of multiple cases of rape and
extrajudicial killings, according to the documents ProPublica obtained.
Those cases also included several incidents where teenagers were
reportedly beaten in custody before being released without charges. The
State Department records obtained by ProPublica do not clearly indicate
which cases the experts ultimately recommended for sanctions, and
several have been tabled pending more information from the Israelis.
Israel generally argues it
has addressed allegations of misconduct and human rights abuses through
its own military discipline and legal systems. In some of the cases,
the forum was satisfied that Israel had taken serious steps to punish
the perpetrators.
But officials agreed on a
number of human rights violations, including some that the Israeli
government had not appeared to adequately address.
Among the allegations
reviewed by the committee was the January 2021 arrest of a 15-year old
boy by Israeli Border Police. The teen was held for five days at the
Al-Mascobiyya detention center on charges that he had thrown stones and
Molotov cocktails at security forces. Citing an allegation shared by a Palestinian child welfare nonprofit,
forum officials said there was credible information the teen had been
forced to confess after he was “subjected to both physical and sexual
torture, including rape by an object.”
Two days after the State
Department asked the Israeli government for information about what steps
it had taken to hold the perpetrators accountable, Israeli police
raided the nonprofit that had originally shared the allegation and later
designated it a terrorist organization. The Israelis told State
Department officials they had found no evidence of sexual assault or
torture but reprimanded one of the teen’s interrogators for kicking a
chair.
Do you have any information about American
arms shipments to countries accused of human rights violations? Contact
Brett Murphy at brett.murphy@propublica.org or by Signal at 508-523-5195.
Alex Mierjeski contributed reporting.
Brett Murphy
Brett Murphy is a reporter on ProPublica’s national desk. His work uncovering a new junk science known as 911 call analysis won a George Polk Award, among other honors.