[Salon] CBS's Ed O'Keefe To WH: "How Many More Charred Corpses" Does Biden Have To See Before Changing Israel Policy?



https://www.compactmag.com/article/natos-endgame-is-nuclear-war/

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date May 28, 2024
CBS's Ed O'Keefe asked National Security Council spokesman John Kirby what level of assault on the Palestinians in Rafah would trigger a change in U.S. policy towards Israel at Tuesday's WH briefing.

"Has the president seen the images?" O'Keefe asked. "How many more charred corpses does he have to see before the president considers a change in policy?"

"I kind of take a little offense at the question," Kirby said. "No civilian casualties is the right number of civilian casualties."

"But the president doesn't have like a personal limit to this?"

JOHN KIRBY, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION: As soon as we saw these reports over the weekend about the strike, we reached out to the Israeli Defense Forces at various levels to gather more information, and we've been actively engaged with the IDF and with partners on the ground to learn more about what happened. I'll note that the Israeli Defense Forces today released initial findings, initial findings, that point to the fire being caused by a secondary explosion, not the initial strike.

I think this speaks very clearly to the challenge of military air strikes in densely populated areas of Gaza, including Rafah, because of the risk of civilian casualties, which of course happened terribly in this case, a horrible loss of life. We're glad that the Israeli Defense Force -- Forces are doing a full investigation, which we believe is going to be very important to try to prevent future such mishaps.

With that, I can take some questions.

ED O'KEEFE, CBS NEWS: Thanks. Admiral, can you explain how the strike in Rafah does not cross the lines that the president has set and many of you have repeated, that the -- that the operations be targeted and limited?

JOHN KIRBY: We still don't believe that a major ground operation in Rafah is warranted. We still don't want to see the Israelis, as we say, smash into Rafah with large units over a -- of a -- over a large pieces of territory. We still believe that and we haven't seen that at this point, but we're going to be watching this, of course, very, very closely.

I want to just end this -- this answer by making it very clear that, regardless, every single loss of innocent life is tragic and every single loss of innocent life should be prevented as much as possible.

QUESTION: Has the president seen the images?

JOHN KIRBY: I don't know. I can't speak to what --

QUESTION: And he's been briefed on it?

JOHN KIRBY: He has absolutely been. He's been kept apprised throughout the weekend on this.

QUESTION: So, you're saying that the tent -- the tent encampment that was first struck is considered a densely populated area?

JOHN KIRBY: The whole area of Rafah, Ed, is densely populated. Now, there has been a million or so who have evacuated Rafah proper, but it's not like they're going all that far away. The whole area is densely populated.

QUESTION: So, how does this not violate the red line that the president laid out?

JOHN KIRBY: As I said, we don't want to see a major ground operation. We haven't seen that at this point.

QUESTION: How many more charred corpses does he have to see before the president considers a change in policy?

JOHN KIRBY: We don't want to see a single more innocent life taken. And I kind of take a little offense at the question. No civilian casualties is the right number of civilian casualties. And this is not something that we've turned a blind eye to, nor has it been something we've ignored or neglected to raise with our Israeli counterreports including, Ed, this weekend as a result of this particular strike. Now, they're investigating it. So let's let them investigate it and see what they come up with.

QUESTION: But the president doesn't have like a personal limit to this?

JOHN KIRBY: The president has been very clear and very direct about what our expectations are for Israeli operations in Rafah specifically, but in Gaza writ large. We don't support, we won't support a major ground operation in Rafah and we've again been very consistent on that. And the president said, that should that occur, then it might make him have to make different decisions in terms of support.

We haven't seen that happen at this point.

QUESTION: Why not have him come out and say that himself?

JOHN KIRBY: The president has been speaking to leaders throughout the region on a regular basis. He has been addressing you guys in various fora. You've got plenty of opportunities to talk to the president, including I might add in a press conference last week.




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.