Shockwaves From Nasrallah's Killing Will Reverberate for Generations Across the Arab World - Middle East News - Haaretz.com
The assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah is a formative moment. While euphoria sweeps through Israel, the Lebanon-based organization's recovery and continuity, both politically and militarily, remains unclear.
This is not the first targeted killing of a Hezbollah leader that Israel has carried out; in 1992, Israel killed Nasrallah's predecessor, Abbas al-Musawi, in 2008, Israel, according to foreign sources, killed Imad Mughniyeh, the head of Hezbollah's military wing, as well as a long list of senior Hezbollah members in the years that followed. It quickly turned out that their replacements didn't display a more moderate or less militant attitude.
And yet, the killing of Nasrallah has a significant impact on morale, reaching far beyond its military and political implications. It spans countries and communities throughout the Arab and Islamic world, not only among Hezbollah members and institutions. The assassination symbolizes a blow to the "resistance" for entire generations.
Although Nasrallah stood at the helm of a Lebanese Shi'ite organization, he was considered a protégé of Iran. He had many critics and opponents in Lebanon and in the Arab and Islamic world, but he was largely viewed as the vanguard of the resistance against Israel. Some called him "Said al-Muqawama" – Mr. Resistance, a title bestowed on no other Arab leader. Nasrallah loved leveraging his nickname, especially after the Second Lebanon War in 2006.
Nasrallah was also thought of as very reliable in everything regarding Hezbollah's capabilities relative to Israel. His every speech drew broad media attention in both the Arab world and Israel. He was perceived as standing up to Israel and the United States more than any other Arab leader. Thus, he became a symbol and an icon.
While Hezbollah's massive intervention in the Syrian civil war and his full support of the Bashar Assad regime damaged his image, Nasrallah tried in recent years to show that he represented the interests of the resistance against Israel and mainly against the United States.
Nasrallah's pivot was an attempt to show the masses that his organization's core interest was to challenge the mastery of the United States and Israel regarding the Palestinian issue. So, he began attacking Israel's north as a sign of support for Gaza and the struggle of both Hamas and the Palestinians, because that was what was demanded of him as the head of a resistance group.
Nasrallah managed to maintain the balance of deterrence against Israel for most of the war – including among the Israeli public. For example, tens of thousands of Israelis evacuated their homes in the north – the scope of which was never seen in the first or second Lebanon wars.
Even after the pager explosions and targeted killings of the heads of Hezbollah's military wing, many in the Arab world perceived him as still having surprises in the pipeline and the ability to withstand the blows to the chain of command. That is how his final speech last week, in which he admitted the depth of the blow but pledged continuity, was treated.
This myth ended with the announcement of his death on Saturday. It is no wonder that many on Saturday noted September 28, 1970 – the day in which then-Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, deemed the father of pan-Arabism, died of a heart attack. Nasser had many opponents in Egypt and the Arab world, especially after he suffered defeat in the 1967 Six-Day War and brought disaster upon his people. But no one doubted his leadership as a pan-Arab hero.
The same could be said of Nasrallah, 54 years later. Both supporters and opponents understand that his assassination constitutes a blow to morale more than a military or political blow.