His country trained him to fight. Then he turned against it. More like him are doing the same
His country trained him to fight. Then he turned against it. More like him are doing the same
This image from a YouTube video posted by Chris Arthur on March 20, 2018, shows him with a handgun during a training video. Arthur was a member of the North Carolina National Guard at the time he posted the video. (AP Photo)
This image from a YouTube video posted by Chris Arthur on March 20, 2018, shows him with a handgun during a training video. Arthur was a member of the North Carolina National Guard at the time he posted the video. (AP Photo)
ASSOCIATED PRESS
MOUNT
OLIVE, N.C. (AP) — The U.S. military trained him in explosives and
battlefield tactics. Now the Iraq War veteran and enlisted National
Guard member was calling for taking up arms against police and
government officials in his own country.
Standing in the North
Carolina woods, Chris Arthur warned about a coming civil war. Videos he
posted publicly on YouTube bore titles such as “The End of America or
the Next Revolutionary War.” In his telling, the U.S. was falling into
chaos and there would be only one way to survive: kill or be killed.
Arthur was posting during a surge of far-right extremism in the years leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
He wrote warcraft training manuals to help others organize their own
militias. And he offered sessions at his farm in Mount Olive, North
Carolina, that taught how to kidnap and attack public officials, use
snipers and explosives and design a “fatal funnel” booby trap to inflict
mass casualties.
While
he continued to post publicly, military and law enforcement ignored
more than a dozen warnings phoned in by Arthur’s wife’s ex-husband about
Arthur’s increasingly violent rhetoric and calls for the murder of
police officers. This failure by the Guard, FBI and others to act
allowed Arthur to continue to manufacture and store explosives around
young children and train another extremist who would attack police
officers in New York state and lead them on a wild, two-hour chase and
gun battle.
Arthur isn’t an anomaly. He is among more than 480
people with a military background accused of ideologically driven
extremist crimes from 2017 through 2023, including the more than 230
arrested in connection with the Jan. 6 insurrection.
At
the same time, while the pace at which the overall population has been
radicalizing increased in recent years, people with military backgrounds
have been radicalizing at a faster rate. Their extremist plots were
also more likely to involve weapons training or firearms than plots that
didn’t include someone with a military background, according to an
Associated Press analysis of domestic terrorism data obtained
exclusively by the AP. This held true whether or not the plots were
executed.
While the number of people involved remains small, the
participation of active military and veterans gave extremist plots more
potential for mass injury or death, according to data collected and
analyzed by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and
Responses to Terrorism, or START, at the University of Maryland. START researchers found
that more than 80% of extremists with military backgrounds identified
with far-right, anti-government or white supremacist ideologies, with
the rest split among far-left, jihadist or other motivations.
In the shadow of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol — led in part by veterans — and a closely contested presidential election, law enforcement officials have said the threat from domestic violent extremists
is one of the most persistent and pressing terror threats to the United
States. However, despite the increasing participation in extremist
activity by those with military experience, there is still no force-wide
system to track it. And the AP learned that Defense Department
researchers developed a promising approach to detect and monitor
extremism that the Pentagon has chosen not to use.
As part of its
investigation, the AP vetted and added to the data and analyses provided
by START, and collected thousands of pages of records and hours of
audio and video recordings through public records requests.
Free
of scrutiny in Mount Olive, Arthur stockpiled weapons, some with the
serial numbers scratched off to make them untraceable. He trained a pack
of Doberman pinschers as guard dogs. He rigged his old farmhouse, where
he lived with his wife, their three kids and two children from her
previous marriage, with improvised explosives, including a bomb hidden
on the front porch and wired to a switch inside.
As early as 2017,
his wife’s former husband had reported concerns about his children's
safety to military, federal and local authorities, according to call
records and police reports.
All the while, Arthur continued growing his business and connecting with more like-minded individuals.
In
early 2020, a man with a raging hatred for police and an interest in
building a militia in Virginia came to the farm, eager to learn.
A festering problem
Service
members and veterans who radicalize make up a tiny fraction of a
percentage point of the millions and millions who have honorably served
their country.
However, when people with military backgrounds
“radicalize, they tend to radicalize to the point of mass violence,”
said START’s Michael Jensen, who leads the team that has spent years
compiling and vetting the dataset.
His group found that among
extremists “the No. 1 predictor of being classified as a mass casualty
offender was having a U.S. military background – that outranked mental
health problems, that outranked being a loner, that outranked having a
previous criminal history or substance abuse issues.”
The data
tracked individuals with military backgrounds, most of whom were
veterans, involved in plans to kill, injure or inflict damage for
political, social, economic or religious goals. While some violent plots
in the data were unsuccessful, those that succeeded killed and hurt
dozens of people. Since 2017, nearly 100 people have been killed or
injured in these plots, nearly all in service of an anti-government,
white supremacist or far-right agenda. Those numbers do not include any
of the violence on Jan. 6, which left scores of police officers injured.
A month after people in tactical gear stormed up the U.S. Capitol steps in military-style stack formation on Jan. 6, the new defense secretary, Lloyd Austin, addressed the long-festering problem. He ordered a force-wide “stand down”
to give time to local military commanders to discuss the issue with
personnel. He empaneled the Countering Extremist Activity Working Group
to study and recommend solutions. Among the group’s eventual recommendations was to clarify what was prohibited under the military’s ban on extremist activity. The revised policy,
released in December 2021, now specifies that anti-government or
anti-democratic actions are violations of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice, federal laws that apply to all service members.
Some
applauded the changes, but military and political leaders had been
concerned about extremism in the ranks for years after a wakeup call in
1995 when Army veteran and white supremacist Timothy McVeigh killed 168
people in the Oklahoma City bombing.
And the Pentagon, Department of Homeland Security and a research arm of
the U.S. Justice Department have all funded START’s research.
Bishop Garrison, a U.S. Army veteran and former senior advisor to Austin, led the working group to address extremism following Jan. 6 and the widespread unrest in 2020 amid the COVID pandemic and a racial reckoning.
“We
believe the vast majority of people who serve do so honorably, and this
is a small group of individuals having an outsized impact,” Garrison
told the AP. “But we also still need to analyze data to ensure that our
hypothesis is correct and supported by fact.”
Yet a chief hurdle
cited by Pentagon officials has been a lack of data – how to understand
the scope of extremism in the ranks when there are millions of
active-duty service members across all of the branches?
“What’s
vexing about this is we don’t have a great sense of the scope of the
problem,” then-Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told CNN in the weeks after
Jan. 6. “Many of these people … work very hard to conceal their
beliefs. We can’t be the thought police.”
The Pentagon did develop
at least one way to detect extremist incidents across military branches
and among civilian defense contractors. But it isn’t using it.
The method was revealed in a research memo
published the summer after Jan. 6 that, until now, has not been
released publicly. American Oversight, a nonpartisan watchdog group,
obtained the memo through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit it
brought against the Pentagon and shared it with the AP.
In a
project that began in September 2020 and lasted into 2021, DoD
researchers studying “insider threats” and other security issues in the
workforce developed a way to mine data from a DoD security clearance
database to identify white supremacist and extremist incidents. This
database included details from security incident reports filed about
people who held security clearances — a wide swath of the military
population, civilians and contractors included.
The operation
identified hundreds of reported incidents of white supremacy and
anti-government and other extremist activity over 20 years — the kinds
of internal red flags that could identify issues with service members.
The
researchers, whose names were redacted, wrote that the results were a
first step toward developing a way to identify incidents of extremism,
and that the method could be used in other DoD databases.
And
while the research was shared among some departments in the DoD after
Jan. 6, it never made it to Garrison, who was leading the Pentagon’s
extremism working group, he told the AP. He called the oversight
“problematic” given his, and the working group’s, mission.
“I am very surprised by the existence of the report.”
A
defense official did not address why the report was not sent directly
to the working group. In a statement, the official said the DoD is
“committed to understanding the root causes of extremism and ensuring
such behavior is promptly and appropriately addressed and reported to
the proper authorities,” and that the department has enhanced its
ability to track extremism allegations.
‘Very violent and very ugly’
Arthur’s
young children sat atop a blue plastic tub on his farmhouse’s porch in
Mount Olive, their feet dangling as their older sister tied their shoes.
In the tub was an improvised bomb that Arthur had wired to a switch
inside the house, according to evidence presented at Arthur’s trial.
“They
would swing their feet as kids do and pop holes in it. I wasn’t very
careful around (the explosives),” the older sister, the daughter of
Arthur’s wife and her ex-husband, told the AP. The AP is not naming the
children interviewed for this story because they are minors.
As an
Army cavalry scout who served two tours in Iraq, Arthur learned more
specialized skills than an average soldier, such as how to rig
improvised explosives. He left the National Guard in 2019 to focus
full-time on Tackleberry Solutions, his military tactics business where
he sold access to this deadly expertise. Tackleberry was Arthur’s
nickname in the Army, after the gun-loving veteran in the “Police
Academy” films known for using inappropriately aggressive military
tactics in civilian contexts.
After leaving the Guard, he also
turned his attention to local politics. Arthur, a former deputy sheriff
himself, backed a “constitutional sheriff” candidate who believed
sheriffs, not federal or state law enforcement, held ultimate authority
in the U.S. He tried to enlist county officials, according to court
documents, to aid in creating a militia to guard against the “tyrannical
government.”
“You’re gonna have to secure your smallest
municipality and governing body first, that means townships or cities
will have to be conquered immediately through force,” Arthur said in a
video posted just after he left the Guard.
“Whatever you do, it has to be very violent and very ugly.”
Arthur’s
videos had become increasingly unhinged, said Ben Powell, who was
hearing from his children that there were explosives hidden throughout
the farm. Powell’s son said he often used a hand-cranked wringer in the
“bomb shed” to dry his clothes. The wringer sat near a barrel of the
explosive Tannerite and Arthur’s storage area for his homemade grenades
and pipe bombs.
“The older I get, the more screwed up I see the stuff is,” the son, now in his teens, said.
Powell
drove a truck as a civilian DoD contractor at the Tooele Army Depot in
Utah. He said he felt a professional responsibility to report Arthur
after watching the videos, and hearing stories from his kids about the
goings on at the farm.
“That’s kind of what I’m supposed to do, is
report if there’s issues, especially if it’s an inside threat, like a
guy in the military,” he said.
He called an Army “I Salute” hotline set up to receive “suspicious activity” reports, and an intelligence hotline.
“I
called and said, ‘You guys need to do something before somebody gets
hurt. He’s talking about killing cops. He’s talking about killing the
FBI.’”
He’d called the North Carolina National Guard previously
with his concerns, and not seen any action. So Powell told his
supervisor at the Utah Army depot about Arthur, and showed some of the
videos. Still, there was no response. The North Carolina National Guard
and the U.S. Army said they did not have any records of discipline
involving Arthur. Heather J. Hagan, an Army spokeswoman, would not
comment on the particulars of Arthur’s case but said “we do forward all
information to our law enforcement partners when appropriate.”
Things
continued to escalate quickly. Arthur and his wife pulled the kids from
the public school and began home-schooling them, with no input from
Powell.
In March 2020 Powell spoke with the Duplin County
Sheriff’s Department, where Arthur had worked briefly as a deputy in the
2000s before he joined the Army. Powell had not spoken with his
children since Christmas, and was worried.
He asked for officers
to make contact with the children to check their welfare. The sheriff
did not respond to a request for comment, but provided records showing
that a deputy reported seeing the children at the farm in March 2020.
The deputy determined the children “appear to be well taken care of” and
took no further action.
That same month, a man came for an extended stay at Arthur’s farm.
Joshua
Blessed slept on a cot in the kitchen and refused to talk to Arthur’s
wife or children. During the day, he would disappear with Arthur for
long training sessions in wartime tactics.
The fatal funnel
Weeks
later, Blessed raced his tractor trailer down a rural highway between
Buffalo and Rochester in upstate New York, firing a pistol out his
window at the parade of police cars behind him.
The sleepy evening
in LeRoy, New York, in May 2020 had been disrupted when an officer
pulled Blessed over for speeding. After a brief verbal exchange, Blessed
drove away with the officer still standing on the truck’s running
boards, forcing him to jump off the moving rig.
Blessed, a
58-year-old truck driver and former security guard from Virginia, had
spent years posting conspiracy-laden videos that vilified law
enforcement.
Now he was leading more than 40 officers on a
high-speed chase and gun battle, ramming multiple squad cars that tried
to slow him down.
The FBI’s office in Richmond, Virginia, had
looked before at Blessed, who also went by Sergei Jourev. In April 2018,
they’d learned that he was attempting to organize a militia extremist
group in preparation for “The Army of God, for the upcoming Civil War.”
Blessed
eventually found Arthur and traveled to his farm to learn about
improvised explosives and other deadly warfare tactics. The two had
continued texting in the weeks before Blessed’s trip to New York about
the technical details of gunpowder, igniters and how to make Claymore
mines, which spray shrapnel.
“Unfortunately, he knew what he was
doing,” said Livingston County Undersheriff Matthew Bean, who was among
those involved in the response.
Midway through the chase, Blessed
stopped his rig, blocking a narrow highway onramp and trapping pursuing
vehicles behind him. He’d also turned the truck’s cab at a slight angle
to see the patrol cars behind him.
Then he opened fire, his bullets pelting the pursuing cruisers.
It
was a “fatal funnel,” the tactic Arthur taught that was meant to make
single combatants facing a much larger force more deadly.
However,
during the gunfire an officer managed to make their way around to the
truck’s passenger side, surprising Blessed, who drove off. Police
vehicles forced him from the interstate onto a road that crossed through
farms. Officers waiting there fired their weapons as Blessed’s truck
roared by.
Finally, the truck crashed into a ditch off the road.
The bullet-scarred cab pulsed with police lights as rattled officers
approached cautiously on foot. Inside, Blessed was slumped over dead,
shot in the head.
It was “divine intervention” that no officers
were hit by the truck or Blessed’s bullets, Bean said. Ammo struck at
least five law enforcement vehicles, according to police reports; a
forensics report found a bullet lodged in an officer’s backpack on the
passenger seat next to him.
“All 40 men and women who responded
had some kind of post-traumatic stress disorder from that incident,”
said Bean. Two left law enforcement because of it, he said.
Investigators figured that Blessed had been planning a much larger attack.
A
few months later, on Jan. 6, Arthur’s apocalyptic visions of the future
began to play out when many like-minded men and women stormed the U.S.
Capitol. Arthur wasn’t in Washington, D.C., he said, but the aftermath
found him almost immediately.
Federal agents were knocking on the
doors of his fellow militia members in North Carolina, he said, and his
own actions would come under tighter scrutiny.
In Blessed’s truck,
investigators had found two how-to explosives and military tactics
manuals for which he had paid $850 from Arthur’s Tackleberry Solutions.
They would find $125,000 in cash, 14 live pipe bombs, an AK-47 with a
scope, a .50-caliber rifle, a sniper rifle and tens of thousands of
dollars in ammunition.
Years had passed since Powell reported
Arthur to multiple military, local and federal law enforcement agencies.
Powell said he called the U.S. Army, FBI, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms and others so many times that he lost count.
“And there was nothing,” Powell said. “There was no response.”
When
asked about Powell’s reports, an FBI spokesperson in Charlotte said the
agency would not provide information beyond what was published in court
records. An ATF spokesperson in North Carolina said there was no record
of them opening a case.
Indeed, federal law enforcement agencies
have a questionable recent history assessing domestic terrorism threats
accurately. The FBI assessment of domestic violent extremists
written before the Jan. 6 attacks reported, incorrectly, the
participants’ “low willingness to take action in response to a disputed
election result” and “those who are interested lack the capability to
carry out anything beyond a simple attack.”
And before the white
supremacist “Unite the Right” violence in Charlottesville in 2017 that
killed a woman and left others severely injured, the Department of Homeland Security had focused much of its threat assessment on the dangers posed by far-left counterprotesters.
After
years of missed opportunities, the FBI was investigating Arthur. “It
takes over 100 rounds and Joshua Blessed is shot and killed,” Powell
said. “It takes cops getting shot at on public roadways during a
high-speed chase with a 40,000-pound truck. That’s what it takes before
anybody even looked into this.”
‘Buckshot’
On May 5, 2021,
Michael Thompson drove to a wartime tactics training session in Mount
Olive. He pulled his truck up to the small, single-story farmhouse
Arthur’s grandfather had built.
It was a year after Blessed’s
rampage in upstate New York and just a few months after Jan.6. Thompson
had contacted Arthur through the Tackleberry webpage.
They approached each other warily.
With a chuckle, Arthur assured Thompson that he wasn’t a cop.
“You never know man, these days,” Thompson said.
“No
you don’t.… And the thing is, that half the cops are good guys, and
half are the bad guys,” Arthur said. “But if I don’t know who’s good and
who’s bad, I’m just gonna walk in and clean house.”
As the two
men became acquainted, Arthur claimed to have built a local militia with
other highly trained veterans including a Navy SEAL, an Army Ranger and
a couple of Marine veterans in the area. One of his military buddies he
called “Priest” stayed at the farm and trained too, according to both
children who spoke to the AP.
“Every night at about 10:30,
(Arthur) would go out into the shed and open up his radios and would
just call out and touch bases with a whole bunch of other people. To
kind of bring together the militia that come together and exchange
information,” said Powell’s daughter, who often sat with Arthur during
these communications when she couldn’t sleep.
Thompson had
contacted Arthur saying he needed to prepare for battle against federal
agents. ATF agents confiscated some of his guns while he was out and his
wife was home with their children alone, he said. They were coming
back. This time he wanted to be ready.
Arthur and Thompson
discussed using hidden, improvised explosive devices, and how Thompson
could transform his house into a “spider web” of fatal booby traps meant
to kill raiding federal agents.
Thompson was wearing a wire for the FBI under the code name “Buckshot.”
“I want to show you something called a spider web,” Arthur said. “This was something I built for a fellow recon buddy of mine.”
“It is a freakin’ death box.”
Thompson
and Arthur talked for hours, eventually settling into seats in the
house with Arthur’s kids swirling around. Then talk turned to
assassination; using snipers and hidden explosives against well-guarded
politicians, according to the recordings.
Arthur said such killings will be necessary in the coming civil war — and that snipers are most effective, in many cases.
“I
know if I can put a round right there in the base of the windshield
where it meets the dashboard. I’ll hit him. So is the sniper hit better?
Yes.
“Say it’s a whole walled-off gated house … The governor’s
mansion. Alright, how do I attack him? Well, he’s going to have to leave
to go to the Capitol at some point, right?” Arthur said, his wife and
children nearby talking about school and working in the garden.
It is these targeted attacks that the data show people with military backgrounds are making more successful. Those include the 2020 murders of a federal security officer
and a sheriff’s deputy in California by an active-duty Air Force staff
sergeant and the 2018 attack by a former Army soldier who shot six women at a Florida hot yoga studio, killing two, before he killed himself.
When
military members are involved, the plots are more likely to seek and
inflict mass casualties — and in an election year it is this kind of
attack that worries people who are studying how military expertise is
influencing extremist action. A mass casualty attack is defined as one
that kills or injures four or more people.
“My primary concern is
not a march on the Capitol or any other government building. It’s that
somebody with the skills that were imparted on them by the military to
be extremely lethal uses those skills,” said START’s Jensen.
“And they go out and attack civilians and have a real impact on public safety.”
Armed
with Thompson’s recordings, FBI agents planned for a way to arrest
Arthur safely — a threat assessment of the farm had determined it was
too dangerous to try it there.
The informant told Arthur to meet
him at a gun show in Raleigh. He said he had contacts there who would
buy some Tackleberry manuals.
Arthur met Thompson at the event
entrance and the two passed through metal detectors — Arthur wasn’t
armed. A SWAT team waiting inside surprised Arthur, who initially
resisted attempts to restrain him, agents said. Officers then forced
Arthur to the ground, and arrested him.
At the same time, bomb
disposal teams were searching Arthur’s home. They found sandbags and
cans filled with Tannerite — which, if hit by gunfire from afar, can
explode. The teams also discovered the pipe bomb wired to a switch on
the porch.
‘You took the oath’
In May, U.S. District Judge James C. Dever III sentenced Arthur to 25 years in federal prison after a jury convicted him
on charges related to teaching the FBI’s informant how to make bombs
meant to kill federal law enforcement officers, as well as illegal
weapons possession.
Prosecutors said they’d found improvised grenades and other “mass casualty” and “indiscriminate” weapons on Arthur’s farm.
A
psychological workup found no evidence of mental illness, but did cite
likely war trauma as a factor in Arthur’s paranoia. Still, the
conclusion was that Arthur did not need “acute mental health treatment.”
Dever,
also a veteran, told Arthur that his specialized military training in
explosives and other warfare techniques made his conduct that much more
serious.
“You took the oath that all of us who served took,” Dever told Arthur. “You know better.”
But Arthur is unrepentant.
In messages to AP from a federal prison in Tennessee, he said he is a target of “political warfare.”
“I’m
a political prisoner,” he wrote, echoing the language former President
Donald Trump and others have used to minimize the crimes committed in
the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.
In Arthur’s view, the
imprisonment of “vets and patriots” like himself and the attempted
assassination of Trump in Pennsylvania prophesy the civil war he has
long argued is coming.
“This is happening,” he wrote. “All the signs are there.”
___
Kessler reported from Washington, D.C. Contributing to this story were Rhonda Shafner, Michael Rezendes and Marshall Ritzel in New York, Serginho Roosblad in San Francisco, Allen G. Breed in Mount Olive, N.C., Rick Bowmer in Salt Lake City, and Michael Kunzelman, Lolita Baldor and Tara Copp in Washington, D.C.
___
The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.