Who’s afraid of George Soros?
![]()
From left to right: Donald Trump, US Treasury-designate Scott Bessent and billionaire-financier& philanthropist George Soros
The
raging controversy over the Bharatiya Janata Party’s allegation that
the Congress Party leadership is hand in glove with the famous US
financier George Soros with an infamous track record of funding the
colour revolutions and regime change projects is snowballing.
Congress
Party may use the floor of the parliament to fuel its public tirades
against the government, borne out of the proverbial folklore of Kerala,
“Whether the leaf falls on a thorn or a thorn on a leaf, the leaf is
always harmed.”
Congress
calculates that the Modi government and the BJP would be the losers if
this controversy remains in focus. These are early days and how all this
pans out is hard to tell, as there are many variables in play. Look at
the reticence of the SP and TMC, for instance, to wade into the Adani
file. Besides, BJP is a peerless champion for diversionary tactics in Indian politics.
From
foreign policy angle, the outcome of the slugfest between India’s two
mainstream parties, is going to depend on an “X” factor, namely, George
Soros’ clout with the incoming US administration and the attitude of
President Donald Trump toward the Deep State’s advancement of a regime
change agenda in Delhi as happened in Bangladesh.
The BJP has quietly backtracked from
its spokesman’s accusation at the press conference in New Delhi on
December 6 that “It has always been the US State Department behind this
agenda”.
The
BJP National Spokesperson and MP Dr. Sambit Patra directly accused the
US State Department of trying to “destabilise India” and claimed that
the US “deep state” is working to “target Prime Minister Narendra Modi”.
“The
Deep State had a clear objective to destabilise India by targeting
Prime Minister Modi,” the BJP spokesman reportedly said. In fact, he
anchored on the Deep State and the US State Department the BJP’s entire
case of Rahul Gandhi being a “traitor of the highest order” and of
Congress “conspiring with foreign forces” to derail the government
because of their “hatred” for Modi.
The
BJP demanded on the floor of the parliament that Rahul Gandhi ought to
be thoroughly investigated for meeting with the controversial business
tycoon George Soros and some other American officials during his
periodic visits to the US who have “a history of peddling anti-India
agenda”.
Of
course, this is an explosive charge that could only have been made with
clearance (or instructions) from the highest echelons of the BJP and
possibly the government.
Surprisingly,
however, the BJP subsequently censored the above remarks from its
lengthy press release on Dr. Patra’s remarks. The bulk of the corporate
media also followed suit with self-censorship, a few exceptions apart.
Such
backtracking doesn’t behoove India’s ruling party or our media honchos.
It smacks of faint-heartedness and lack of resolve. This is happening
despite the well-known fact that Soros indeed has a long history of
acting as the frontman of the US State Department in its regime change
projects abroad.
Organisations such as Soros’ Open Society Foundations (founded in 1984) or National Endowment for Democracy (founded in 1983) are to be seen as the US government’s “white gloves” for
- instigating colour revolutions to subvert state power in other countries;
- cultivating pro-US forces in target countries;
- misrepresenting the human rights situation in other countries;
- manipulating and interfering in other countries’ elections;
- inciting division and confrontation to undermine the stability of other countries; and,
- fabricating
false information to mislead public opinion, using “academic
activities” as a cloak for interference and infiltration.
This
is a complex story on which Professor Sreeram Chaulia, at the O.P.
Jindal Global University, had written a well-researched essay titled Democratisation, NGOs and “colour revolutions” way back in 2006.
By
the way, Soros is also a globalist by conviction who genuinely
subscribes the neocon ideology. He has given to the Foundations over $32
billion of a personal fortune made in the financial markets. The
Foundations are estimated to have $25 billion in assets last year, and
amongst worldwide activities, they prioritise “the current challenges …
of the rise of new forms of authoritarianism” in foreign countries.
Will
Trump put Soros out of business? This seems to be the assumption in
Delhi, which is predicated on the antipathy between Trump and Soros who
had close links with the Democratic Party — and, conversely, on Trump’s
jovial attitude toward Modi.
Soros
is a formidable adversary who has reportedly earmarked one billion
dollars for a regime change in India. He views regime changes not simply
as a neocon pastime but also as a business proposition. In Ukraine,
where he funded the Maidan protests and regime change in 2014, he is
investing to generate lucrative business (here and here)
No doubt, what remains to be seen is how Trump sees Soros going forward. It is a complicated story, as Soros has his line open to Trump’s inner circle.
There are some straws in the wind. Basically, Trump is a dealmaker who
has no permanent friends or allies — or enemies, for that matter.
The salience of Trump’s one hour twenty-six minutes long interview with
NBC News on Sunday, his first after the election victory, is that while
he may harshly deal with those officials who misused their authority
under President Biden’s watch to harass him, humiliate him and hunt him
down, he hopes to work with the Democratic Party lawmakers in the
Congress to carry forward his agenda.
Trump
acknowledged the criticality of bipartisan support to make the required
constitutional amendments in regard of immigration laws. He even paid
tribute to the left wing constituency who voted for him.
Significantly,
Alex Soros, son of George Soros, had generously contributed to Kamala
Harris’ chest, but has since paid a fulsome compliment to Trump. He wrote on X:
“Too many Democrats are fighting each other over campaign tactics,
because it is easier than accepting that Trump was underestimated as a
candidate. He was a “super candidate” with increasing appeal to a
broader electorate — likely beyond the reach of both Democrats and
Republicans.”
Interestingly, Elon Musk also responded by calling himself the “George Soros of the middle. I don’t want the pendulum to swing too far right, but right now it’s just too far left.”
The bottom line is that Trump has made a thoughtful decision to tap Scott Bessent for
the crucial cabinet position of Treasury Secretary. Bessent’s
credentials include his stint on a small team at Soros’ investment firm
through the 1980s that in 1992 helped “break” the Bank of England with
crushing trades against the British pound, having amassed a $10 billion
bet that the pound was overvalued.
The New York Times reported,
“Though the British government tried to support the currency, it wasn’t
able to withstand the pressure, and the pound plunged in value. Mr.
Soros’s fund earned more than $1 billion, along with credit (and infamy)
for orchestrating one of Wall Street’s most audacious trades.”
Now, there’s nothing Trump loves more than Wall Street’s seductive success stories.
Times wrote, “it was Mr. Bessent’s experience at Mr. Soros’s fund —
including another high-profile bet, against the Japanese yen — that
helped define his career, and that his former colleagues and other
associates see as a crucial credential” for the cabinet job as Treasury
Secretary.
And
now comes the news that Trump has picked a California lawyer Harmeet
Kaur Dhillon to head the US justice Department’s civil rights division
and nominated her as assistant attorney-general, who, apparently,
empathises with pro-Khalistan activists in the US and Canada.
Do
not underestimate the ingenuity of the Deep State in America to have
its way. Keeping the guard down will be a catastrophic mistake on the
part of Delhi establishment. We could get hit when least expected.
That’s what happened in Syria and Bangladesh.
Eternal
vigilance is the price of liberty, as they say. Make no mistake, at the
end of the day, Trump is a great patriot and nationalist who stands by
“America First” as his chosen dictum. An equal relationship based on mutual respect is impossible to forge with the US.
