The Syrian revolution will inspire the masses in other countries in 
the region to move against their tyrants [photo credit: Ugur Yıldırım]
For all their faults Iran and Hezbollah had the benefit at least of 
being familiar foes who Israel knows well. Assad was the ideal frenemy: 
though Syria has been officially at war with Israel since the country 
was founded there was never any chance he was actually ever going to 
attack. The proof of this is that in the last few days Israel has 
deployed ground troops both into and beyond a demilitarised buffer zone 
for the first time in 50 years and conducted 480 airstrikes destroying
 targets including advanced weapons to prevent them falling into rebel 
hands, weapons that had previously been regarded as non-threatening in 
Assad’s hands. Monday night saw further escalation with the sinking of the Assad regime naval fleet at Minet el-Beida and Latakia.
As al-Jolani made clear in his victory speech
 in Damascus’ Ummayad Mosque on Sunday Iranian influence in Syria is now
 set to end which means the Iranian infrastructure Assad allowed to be 
implanted with its transit route from Iran to Hezbollah is going to be 
shut down. This is something Israel has sought to achieve for a long 
time, but in attacking Syria immediately in the wake of the HTS win it 
once again chose a military rather than a diplomatic route that is not 
going to bring security.
On the contrary, the dawn of a revolutionary Sunni Jihadi government 
in Syria, however softly it presents itself, is far more dangerous to 
Israel and the regional Arab leaders than Iran, Hezbollah and the 
Huthis. The Arab leaders are all locked in a war with Sunni political 
Islam and their dungeons are full of men like al-Jolani. Israel knows 
from its long war with Hamas, that Sunni Jihadis are a much more potent 
foe than Shia forces like Iran and Hezbollah because while Iran and the 
Shia forces claim the mantle of Islam, they fight Israel mostly out of a
 political motivation, to maintain a balance of power in the region 
against the US. Sunni Jihadis on the other hand fight for a different 
reason: out of a burning, inner religious conviction which dictates they
 will never give up until Israel is completely destroyed.
Given the sudden change in the fortunes of the Islamists it is to be 
expected Israel, the West and the Arab regimes that opposed the original
 Arab Spring will all quickly rally and try to find ways to undermine 
the revolution. Israeli officials have already developed a sudden 
interest in Syrian minorities with Netanyahu extending the hand of peace to the Druze, Kurds and Christians, as well as Muslims and the Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar saying at a press briefing on Monday that Israel has been talking with Kurdish rebels that control northeast Syria.
Many observers had disengaged from news about the Syrian civil war 
due to the widespread belief that the revolution was over and that the 
Assad regime had effectively regained control of much of the country. A 
similar thing happened with the Palestinian issue prior to the 7 October
 Hamas attack. In both cases such assumptions turned out to be wrong: 
the human desire for freedom from tyranny is universal and can never be 
fully suppressed.
With the overthrow of the Assad dictatorship optimism for 
revolutionary change among the peoples of the Arab world has surged. 
Whether that leads to the strategic foresight, unity, and disciplined 
leadership that is critical to navigating the challenges ahead and 
securing a brighter future for Syria and the region remains to be seen.
Members can leave comments about this newsletter on the Arab Digest website