On
the last day of 2024, the deputy general counsel for the House of
Representatives formally accepted delivery of a civil summons for two
congressmembers from Northern California. More than 600 constituents of
Jared Huffman and Mike Thompson have signed on as plaintiffs in a class action
accusing them of helping to arm the Israeli military in violation of
“international and federal law that prohibits complicity in genocide.”
Whatever the outcome of the lawsuit, it conveys widespread anger and anguish about the ongoing civilian carnage in Gaza that taxpayers have continued to bankroll.
By a wide margin, most Americans favor an arms embargo on Israel
while the Gaza war persists. But Huffman and Thompson voted to approve
$26.38 billion in military aid for Israel last April, long after the
nonstop horrors for civilians in Gaza were evident.
Back in February -- two months before passage of the enormous military aid package -- both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International
found that, in the words of the lawsuit, “the Israeli government was
systematically starving the people of Gaza through cutting off aid,
water, and electricity, by bombing and military occupation, all
underwritten by the provision of U.S. military aid and weapons.”
When the known death toll passed 40,000 last summer, the UN’s high commissioner for human rights said:
“Most of the dead are women and children. This unimaginable situation
is overwhelmingly due to recurring failures by the Israeli Defense
Forces to comply with the rules of war.” He described as “deeply
shocking” the “scale of the Israeli military’s destruction of homes,
hospitals, schools and places of worship.”
No
one should put any trust in the court system to stop the U.S. government
from using tax dollars for war. But suing congressmembers who are
complicit in genocide is a good step.
On Dec. 4, Amnesty International released a 296-page report
concluding that Israel has been committing genocide “brazenly,
continuously and with total impunity” -- with the “specific intent to
destroy Palestinians,” engaging in “prohibited acts under the Genocide
Convention.”
Two weeks later, on the same day the lawsuit was
filed in federal district court in San Francisco, Human Rights Watch
released new findings that “Israeli authorities are responsible for the crime against humanity of extermination and for acts of genocide.”
Responding to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for Thompson said
that “achieving peace and securing the safety of civilians won’t be
accomplished by filing a lawsuit.” But for well over a year, to no
avail, the plaintiffs and many other constituents have been urging him
and Huffman to help protect civilians by ending their support for the
U.S. pipeline of weapons and ammunition to Israel.
Enabled by that
pipeline, the slaughter has continued in Gaza while the appropriators
on Capitol Hill work in a kind of bubble. Letters, emails, phone calls,
office visits, protests and more have not pierced that bubble. The
lawsuit is an effort to break through the routine of indifference.
Like
many other congressional Democrats, Huffman and Thompson have prided
themselves on standing up against the contempt for facts that Donald Trump
and his cohorts flaunt. Yet refusal to acknowledge the facts of
civilian decimation in Gaza, with a direct U.S. role, is an extreme form
of denial.
“Over the last 14 months I have watched elected
officials remain completely unresponsive despite the public’s demands to
end the genocide,” said Laurel Krause, a Mendocino County resident who
is one of the lawsuit plaintiffs.
Another plaintiff, Leslie
Angeline, a Marin County resident who ended a 31-day hunger strike when
the lawsuit was filed, said: “I wake each morning worrying about the
genocide that is happening in Gaza, knowing that if it wasn’t for my
government’s partnership with the Israeli government, this couldn’t
continue.”
Such passionate outlooks are a far cry from the words
offered by members of Congress who routinely appear to take pride in
seeming calm as they discuss government policies. But if their own
children’s lives were at stake rather than the lives of Palestinian
children in Gaza, they would hardly be so calm. A huge empathy gap is
glaring.
In the words of plaintiff Judy Talaugon, a Native
American activist in Sonoma County, “Palestinian children are all our
children, deserving of our advocacy and support. And their liberation is
the catalyst for systemic change for the betterment of us all.”
As
a plaintiff, I certainly don’t expect the courts to halt the U.S.
policies that have been enabling the horrors in Gaza to go on. But our
lawsuit makes a clear case for the moral revulsion that so many
Americans feel about the culpability of the U.S. government.
To
hardboiled political pros, the heartfelt goal of putting a stop to the
arming of the Israeli military for genocide is apt to seem quixotic and
dreamy. But it’s easy for politicians to underestimate feelings of moral
outrage. As James Baldwin wrote,
“Though we do not wholly believe it yet, the interior life is a real
life, and the intangible dreams of people have a tangible effect on the
world.”
Organizing together under the name Taxpayers Against Genocide,
constituents served notice that no amount of rhetoric could make
funding of genocide anything other than repugnant. Jared Huffman and
Mike Thompson are the first members of Congress to face such a lawsuit.
They won’t be the last.
In recent days, people from many parts of the United States have contacted Taxpayers Against Genocide (via classactionagainstgenocide@proton.me) to see the full lawsuit and learn about how they can file one against their own member of Congress.
No
one should put any trust in the court system to stop the U.S.
government from using tax dollars for war. But suing congressmembers who
are complicit in genocide is a good step for exposing -- and organizing
against -- the power of the warfare state.