It has become fashionable among Western commentators to predict the decline of China’s economic “miracle.”
Slowing growth, a troubled real estate sector and demographic shifts are regularly cited as evidence of the malaise. Tensions with the United States – especially under the past two administrations – have further fueled this narrative.
Yet the picture is far more nuanced. Under President Donald Trump, Washington has so far avoided the most sweeping tariffs and measures that his campaign rhetoric suggested were a done deal.
However, three days before his inauguration, Trump remarked: “I anticipate that we will address numerous issues together, starting right away. We talked about trade balance, Fentanyl, TikTok, and various other topics. President Xi and I will do everything we can to make the world more peaceful and secure.”
These comments suggest an implicit recognition that China’s economy is evolving, not collapsing – and that the United States, despite its rhetoric, understands Beijing’s structural shifts.
China’s early success was indeed driven by export-led manufacturing and state-owned heavy industry. Today, more than 65 of the 69 Chinese companies on the Fortune Global 500 are state-owned.
In recent years, Beijing has pushed for SOE mergers to bolster “national champions,” especially in strategic sectors. At a glance, such actions might reinforce the narrative of state dominance.
Yet the ground is clearly shifting. In the late 1990s, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) accounted for more than half of China’s industrial output. Today, they produce roughly 30%. Private firms have become the economy’s engine of job creation and efficiency gains.
Private companies now contribute more than 50% of tax revenue and over 60% of GDP. Consumption, long overshadowed by investment and exports, has risen in importance – from 35% of GDP a decade ago to nearly 55% by 2023.
New policies bolster private players by offering greater access to scientific infrastructure and improved financing channels. The objective is clear: preserve strategic state oversight while harnessing the dynamism of the private sector.
An exemplar of this private-sector dynamism is DeepSeek, founded by hedge fund manager Liang Wenfeng. The company recently unveiled its R1 large language model (LLM), a groundbreaking AI system developed on a relatively modest budget.
DeepSeek’s trajectory challenges the notion that Chinese firms rely solely on state-driven innovation. Its story instead highlights the private sector’s capacity to overcome domestic hurdles and external restrictions alike.
Lessons from early US-led AI breakthroughs steered DeepSeek toward an innovative path that diverges sharply from Western norms: the company developed novel training methods and “pure reasoning capabilities” without any supervised data, all while rejecting the typical model of massive resource investment seen in America.
Operating under hardware constraints imposed by sanctions, DeepSeek created unique optimization techniques to fully utilize less powerful GPUs, a feat that has surprised US researchers.
Using just 2,048 Nvidia H800 GPUs and US$5.6 million, it trained a model with 671 billion parameters – comparable to efforts by American giants such as OpenAI and Google, which often spend multiples of that amount.
For Beijing, technological self-reliance has long been an economic characteristic of strategic priority. At a recent meeting of entrepreneurs with Premier Li Qiang, China’s second-most powerful leader, the message was blunt: “Concentrate efforts to break through key core technologies.”
DeepSeek’s success aligns with this vision. The company’s “local-first” approach – staffing its ranks with PhDs from Chinese universities – illustrates Beijing’s broader strategy to reduce reliance on foreign technology while cultivating homegrown talent. It is part of a broader push toward a self-sustaining innovation ecosystem capable of weathering geopolitical pressures.
Even today, China’s economic evolution is often misconstrued as a move away from manufacturing. In reality, it is a shift up the value chain.
The country continues to leverage its vast manufacturing prowess, built over decades, to dominate high-tech industries such as renewable energy, electric vehicles and AI. DeepSeek’s rise mirrors the broader trajectory of firms like Huawei and ByteDance, which have transformed from imitators into global innovators.
At the same time, China leads the world in AI-related patents and boasts one of the largest pools of graduates in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Its digital economy accounts for over 40% of GDP, driven by e-commerce giants Alibaba and JD.com.
Newcomers like DeepSeek are pushing boundaries further by demonstrating that even global-scale AI can emerge from smaller budgets if paired with the right mix of technical expertise and business acumen.
One of the most critical, yet sometimes overlooked, aspects of China’s continued economic strength is its unrivaled industrial and production base. This ecosystem, painstakingly built over decades of export-led growth, is not simply about low-cost assembly.
It is a vast, integrated network of suppliers, logistics hubs, specialized clusters and infrastructure that supports a range of high-value industries.
This industrial backbone is more than a relic of China’s past; it is a fundamental platform for the next phase of its economic transformation. Companies developing large language models, EV batteries, or green technologies can tap into a powerful base of suppliers, technicians, and engineers, enabling them to iterate faster and scale more efficiently than competitors elsewhere.
This synergy underpins China’s ability to pivot toward cutting-edge sectors without abandoning its manufacturing roots.
Against this backdrop, predictions of China’s imminent downfall appear short-sighted. The country’s current challenges, such as high youth unemployment and the real estate sector’s recalibration, are significant but not unique. Major economies have navigated similar transitions when reaching comparable stages of development.
When America’s GDP was roughly China’s current size, it grew at an average of 2.4% annually. By contrast, China posted growth rates of 5.4% in 2023, 5% in 2024 and is projected to maintain 4%-5% growth through 2025.
These figures, while lower than the double-digit expansions of the past, remain impressive for an economy of China’s scale. And with a GDP per capita of $12,970 – significantly below the U.S. level of $83,000 – China still has ample room for “catch-up” growth, especially as it invests more in education, innovation and domestic consumption.
Moreover, even incremental growth in a $17 trillion economy adds substantially to global GDP. By embracing structural reforms, promoting private-sector innovation, and unlocking household wealth, Beijing appears committed to laying the groundwork for a more stable economic model—one less vulnerable to external shocks and better aligned with a burgeoning middle class of some 400 million people.
Dismissing China’s economy as having “peaked” overlooks its ongoing metamorphosis. The rise of companies like DeepSeek underscores the dynamism of China’s private sector in driving innovation and overcoming externally imposed constraints.
DeepSeek’s achievements exemplify a broader narrative of resilience, where challenges – though significant – are neither insurmountable nor indicative of inevitable decline.
A more nuanced perspective reveals China’s transition from an export-driven, investment-heavy model to one centered on domestic consumption and technological innovation. Far from being abandoned, its vast manufacturing infrastructure is being upgraded and redeployed to support a high-tech future.
This evolution is a testament to China’s resilience, ingenuity and capacity for reinvention – qualities that continue to reshape the possibilities for others in the global economy.
Marcus Loh is a Director at Temus, a digital transformation services firm headquartered in Singapore, where he serves as the business head of Step IT Up and leads public affairs, marketing and strategic communication.
He was formerly the President of the Institute of Public Relations of Singapore and he presently serves as an executive committee member of the digital transformation chapter of SG Tech, the leading trade association for Singapore’s technology industry.