Re: [Salon] Helena Cobban on Trump's Hamas outreach



Thank you so much for this interesting reporting. I don’t follow the ME too much these days, too much going on in Ukraine, and my sentiments are much more ambivalent.  But again, Helena, really appreciate this piece. 

On Mar 6, 2025, at 5:45 PM, Chas Freeman via Salon <salon@listserve.com> wrote:

Trump's Hamas outreach


Yesterday, Barak Ravid of Axios broke the story that Pres. Trump's "Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs" (SPEHA) Adam Boehler had held several, apparently face-to-face, meetings in Qatar with Hamas leaders over recent weeks. They discussed some kind of a deal that would involve, in the first instance, the release of the five American-Israeli dual-citizen hostages still held by Hamas, or their remains, in response for some (as yet undefined) quid pro quo for Hamas... According to Axios, these talks may also have gone further in terms of reviving some version of the broader ceasefire-for-hostages deal for Gaza that has been completely on hold since last Sunday.

Yesterday evening, too, Trump posted a belligerent, quite possibly ass-covering, message on his "Truth Social" platform. In all-caps he warned: "RELEASE THE HOSTAGES NOW, OR THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY LATER!"

What to make of all this?

First, some background.

Of the 59 captives still thought to be held by Hamas and other resistance elements in Gaza-- of whom under half are thought to be still alive-- the five who are also U.S. citizens consist of three men who were serving in the Israeli military when taken, and two senior citizens. Only one-- a serving soldier-- is thought to be still alive.

Trump's envoy Adam Boehler is an interesting guy-- someone with a much deeper and broader track-record in undertaking international missions for Trump than the "Special Presidential Envoy for the Middle East", Steve Witkoff. Sccording to Wikipedia. Boehler is a former classmate of Jared Kushner. During the first Trump term, he undertook many international missions, including some of the preps for the "Abraham Accords" and some of Trump's key negotiations with Afghan leaders. Those latter talks were conducted in Qatar

According to Ravid's Axios account, and others that quickly followed it on several Israeli media platforms including Haaretz, the Times of Israel, etc, Boehler (and sometimes Witkoff) had been conducting their contacts with Hamas for a number of weeks-- that is, during the 42-day period in which Phase One of the previously agreed three-phase ceasefire agreement was being implemented.

Phase One came to an end last Sunday. In the days prior to that, Witkoff and the Israelis had proposed that, since the planned negotiations over the details of Phase Two had gotten nowhere, the terms of Phase One should simply be continued. And/or, a completely new arrangement could be implemented to replace the long-ago agreed Phases Two and Three of the agreement.

For its part, the Hamas leadership had argued that both those US-Israeli proposals violated the spirit and the terms of the three-phase agreement to which they had agreed as long ago as last May, and which the Israelis finally agreed to-- under the intense urging of Steve Witkoff-- only on January 15. The Hamas leaders therefore rejected any attempts to breach the agreed-upon three-phase agreement. (They also pointed out that Israel's implementation of Phase One had been extremely poor, falling far short of allowing into Gaza the agreed-upon numbers of desperately needed tents, mobile shelters, and other aid items, and far short of ceasing fire completely throughout Gaza, too.)

Last Sunday, Israel abruptly-- and without encountering any U.S. protest-- halted the entry into Gaza of all humanitarian aid.

Other relevant developments over the past ten days also included: 
  • The successful conclusion last Thursday of the last portion of the reciprocal captive-release steps specified for Phase One of the agreement. Under Phase One, 55 or so Israeli captives have been released from Gaza, while several hundred of the 10,000 or so Palestinian captives held by Israel-- comprising many who had never been charged or tried for any crime, and some who had served fairly long prison sentences--were also released.
  • Trump's release last week of the truly obscene AI-generated video of what a "Trump Gaza" development might look like, in the context of his previously stated plan to transfer all of Gaza's population out of the Strip completely while he, Jared Kushner, and others would implement his plan to "own Gaza completely."
  • Egypt's hasty though actually successful convening of a conference of Arab leaders to design (and finance) an alternative plan for rebuilding Gaza while its residents still remained within it. On Tuesday, the Arab League as a whole formally adopted that $53 billion plan.
... So now we know that while all that was going on, Adam Boehler was also conducting his talks with Hamas in Qatar. It seems that Israel's once-famed Mossad secret service didn't get wind of Boehler's mission until very recently. The Axios, reporter Barak Ravid has a long history of work with Israel's security services. It is quite possible that after Mossad did learn of (or were told about) the Qatar talks, they "leaked" the news to Ravid, since when he publishes news reports in US-based Axios he is not subject to the dauntingly tight censorship the Israelis impose on the reporting of security affairs out of their country. But once he had reported it in Axios, Israeli news outlets then became more free, citing his reports, to build on them and add some more details of their own details about the Boehler-Hamas talks.

For my part, I'm fascinated by the degree to which Trump and his team are prepared, when they see fit, to refuse the "always kow-tow to Israel" stance that Pres. Biden had always, boot-lickingly stuck to. We saw Trump's willingness to break with that earlier, when Witkoff, nine days prior to Trump's inauguration, forced Netanyahu to meet with him on a Saturday and to finally sign onto the ready-since-last-May three phase agreement.

So Trump's willingness to talk with Hamas behind the backs of the Israelis is a further indication of his willingness to buck the Israeli diktat.

But then yesterday, Israel's fanatically pro-settler finance minister Bezalel Smotrich was given a warm welcome in Trump's Treasury Department by his U.S. counterpart, amid some speculation in the Israeli media that Trump might soon announce his support for an Israeli annexation of the West Bank. Smotrich has frequently threatened that if the Gaza ceasefire deal proceeds, he is quite prepared to top[ple Netanyahu's government

Agreeing to grant Smotrich an official visit to Washington was another significant-- and much more disturbing-- departure from Pres. Biden's policies.

Trump, as we know, loves to keep everyone around him off-balance, and to keep himself firmly at the center of attention as the only force who can resolve all the contradictory messages that he's very happy to sow all around him. So it seems hard to determine, as of now, whether the talks with Hamas will lead to anything constructive, or whether Trump will instead be quite happy to give the Israelis a bright green light to use all the military and intel help that he's given them, to resume its genocidal attack on all of Gaza with even more force than before.

However, there seems to me a real possibility that the contacts with Hamas may prove constructive. One indicator, from on-the-ground in Gaza, is that despite Sunday's abrupt cut-off of aid trucks, the broader ceasefire seems still to have held more or less as previously-- that is, with strong discipline in holding fire from the resistance side, and only sporadic violations from the Israeli side.

Another indicator is the statement the Hamas Political Bureau released yesterday evening (PDF here) in which they noted that:
There is a shift in US political discourse compared to previous administrations, with a tendency to find a comprehensive deal in the region. The Arab stance and popular pressure could lead to a change in the American president's plan for displacement.
The statement also laid out the following negotiating positions:
We agreed in Cairo meetings to the Egyptian proposal to form a temporary support committee until a consensus [Palestinian] government is formed and elections are held.

There will be no extension of the first phase, and we are committed to the ceasefire agreement while waiting for the start of the second phase negotiations.

We see no benefit in the presence of non-Palestinian forces in Gaza...
It strikes me that the ferocity of Israel's genocide over the past 17 months, and then the cruel audacity of Trump's recent "Mar-a-Gaza" proposals have-- along with the resilience, pluck, and skill of the multi-dimensional resistance that the people of Gaza have sustained for the past 17 months-- finally persuaded Arab governments that for many decades have been complacently in the pro-Washington (and therefore, by clear implication, also the pro-Israel) camp that they finally need to take some form of action to resist the US-Israeli designs on what remains of Palestine. Even if they do this only to save their own, very tired nd very repressive regimes...

So maybe, just maybe, the Trump team's overtures to Hamas, and the cautiously positive response of the Hamas leaders may lead to something positive.

This does carry some echoes of the brief diplomatic achievement that Secretary of States George Shultz won in late 1988, when he made his first careful opening to to the long-vilified PLO (back in the day.) That opening was quickly slammed shut... But then, five years later it was Israeli PM Yitzhak Rabin who took the initiative to persuade a new U.S. administration to work directly with the PLO. This time around, if there is second-guessing and a retreat by Washington, there is unlikely to be any pressure from any conceivable Israeli government that would push proactively for engagement with the Palestinians' current resistance leaders.

There are other possible pitfalls, too. Might the Trump team have in mind that by talking to Hamas they could move towards a "Gaza only" form of (extremely limited) Palestinian "liberation", while giving Smotrich and his allies the go-ahead for a full-scale annexation of the West Bank? Who knows?

We are now, certainly, deep into experiencing-- at the global level, as well as in West Asia-- many different kinds of "interesting times." Let's hope that with the growing power of the deeply anti-colonialist Global Majority, better days may lie ahead.

You stay well--

Helena
--
Salon mailing list
Salon@listserve.com
https://mlm2.listserve.net/mailman/listinfo/salon



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.