But Israelis, too, are finding their voice in opposition to Netanyahu’s conduct of the war. In an interview with the BBC, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert said
what Israel “is currently doing in Gaza is very close to a war crime.
Thousands of innocent Palestinians are being killed, as well as many
Israeli soldiers.” Yair
Golan, leader of the left-leaning Democrats party and a former top
general in the Israel Defense Forces, was scathing in his denunciation
of the war. “Israel is on the way to becoming a pariah state among the
nations, the South Africa of yore, if it does not return to behaving
like a sane country,” said Golan, speaking to a public broadcaster on Tuesday.
“A sane country doesn’t engage in fighting against civilians, doesn’t
kill babies as a hobby and doesn’t set the expulsion of a population as a
goal,” he said. Golan
was repudiated by Netanyahu and many of his political allies, including
far-right leaders and cabinet ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel
Smotrich — both of whom have called for Gaza’s conquest and
depopulation. But Golan rebuffed their criticism. “The
intention of my statements was clear. This war is the enactment of Ben
Gvir and Smotrich’s fantasies,” he said. “And if we let them enact them,
we will become a pariah state.” With reports suggesting that President Donald Trump, an inveterate ally of Netanyahu, is also growing frustrated with the pace of the war, a fear of isolation is shaking Israel’s establishment. “There
is nothing good about this state of affairs for either the hostages or
the well-being of our soldiers who are fighting in the Gaza Strip,”
wrote Nadav Eyal, a prominent Israeli commentator, in the mass market
daily Yedioth Ahronoth. “It is sad and painful that this government …
has led us into this corner.” In Europe
and the United States, politicians are also reacting to mounting public
anger over the suffering in Gaza. In one of the biggest single protests
in years in the Netherlands, tens of thousands marched through the
Dutch capital of The Hague in opposition to Israel over the weekend. Britain’s
foreign secretary David Lammy, who has been criticized by colleagues
further to the left for not taking a tougher line on Israel, offered a
stark warning Tuesday for the Israeli government. “History will judge
them,” Lammy said. “Blocking aid. Expanding the war. Dismissing the
concerns of your friends and partners. This is indefensible. And it must
stop.” On the same day, Tanja Fajon,
Slovenia’s foreign minister, said not confronting Israel would cause
harm to the European Union as a political project. “The EU’s failure to
clearly and forcefully condemn Israel’s killing of civilians … is
causing irreparable damage to the reputation of the E.U. globally and at
home. People, children are starving, aid workers are being killed, and
the E.U. is still silent?” And there
are glimmers of a reckoning in Washington, too. At a Monday panel event I
moderated on prospects for peace in Ukraine, Rep. Jason Crow
(D-Colorado) said that the United States has “lost a lot of our ability”
to talk about international humanitarian law and human rights on the
world stage because of its inconsistency in applying these principles to all conflicts. When
it came to Israel, neither the Trump administration nor its Democratic
predecessor chose to enforce existing U.S. laws that condition the
provision of military aid to foreign countries on matters of human
rights. “It really undermined our legitimacy and our standing, to this
day,” Crow said. |