Israel’s
foreign ministry called the resolution “disgraceful,” but it added to a
growing chorus from rights groups concluding that Israel is committing
genocide.
The
resolution, by the International Association of Genocide Scholars,
added to a growing chorus from human rights organizations and academics
concluding that Israel is committing genocide, a crime outlined in a
1948 convention and defined by acts intended to “destroy, in whole or in
part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.”
An
Israeli foreign ministry spokesman, in a message posted on X, called
the resolution “disgraceful,” and said it was based on an unverified
“campaign of lies” by the Palestinian militant group Hamas. Israel’s
government has reacted angrily to any suggestion its military campaign
amounts to genocide, a crime defined in the aftermath of the Nazis’
systematic murder campaign against Jews during the Holocaust.
The
resolution states that the Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas against Israel
that killed more than 1,200 people and prompted the Israeli military
campaign in Gaza “constitutes international crimes.” But it also
concludes that Israel’s response violates all five conditions set out in
the 1948 convention, including “killing members of the group” and
“deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to
bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,” according to
Emily Sample, a member of the association’s executive board.
Any one of the conditions would be sufficient for a finding of genocide.
The
association has roughly 500 members. A large majority — 86 percent — of
members who voted on the resolution approved it, Sample said. “We were
very surprised at the level of consensus there was,” she said, adding
that the board had refrained from issuing statements on the question of
whether Israel’s conduct amounted to genocide, as it has in other
conflicts, given the fraught debate over the issue.
The
resolution accused Israel of carrying out “indiscriminate and
deliberate” attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure in
Gaza, deliberately attacking medical and aid workers as well as
journalists, forcibly displacing the enclave’s entire population
multiple times and killing or injuring more than 50,000 children.
“This
destruction of a substantial part of a group constitutes genocide,” the
association concluded, of the attacks on Gaza’s children.
More
than 63,000 people in Gaza have been killed, according to the Gaza
Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and
combatants.
Israel
has repeatedly said it does not intentionally target uninvolved
civilians and accuses Hamas of fighting from populated areas. Throughout
the war, Israel has barred independent human rights groups and
journalists from traveling to Gaza. Palestinian journalists in the
enclave have been killed in numbers unprecedented for media workers in a
modern conflict — the vast majority in Israeli air or drone attacks,
according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.
The
resolution nodded to the growing number of organizations finding Israel
is committing genocide, among them Human Rights Watch, Amnesty
International and the Israeli rights group B’Tselem, along with United
Nations experts. The International Court of Justice is hearing a case
brought by South Africa alleging that Israel is violating international
law by committing and failing to prevent genocidal acts.
Sample
said the timing of the association’s resolution — long after the war
started, on the eve of the second anniversary of the conflict — may have
owed to a fear of “personal and professional consequences.” Members of
the association had lost jobs in the United States and been denied visas
to travel there for speaking out, she said.
For scholars, “coming out against a genocide like this was difficult to weigh personally,” she said.
In
Israel, where there has been broad support for the military offensive,
but splits among academics regarding the nature of the war, the small
number of Israeli experts who specialize in genocide studies nearly all
agree that Israel’s actions amount to genocide, said Shmuel Lederman, an
Israeli genocide scholar and political theorist at the Open University
and University of Haifa.
In
recent months, particularly after Israel announced a near-total
blockade of humanitarian aid in March, more of Israel’s academics,
particularly international law experts, began to consider the genocide
label, Lederman said. After famine was declared in parts of Gaza last
month by the global authority on hunger, Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu attacked assertions that Israel’s role in the famine bolstered
the case for genocide.
“If we wanted to commit genocide, it would have taken exactly one afternoon,” he told Israeli reporters in August.
“What
we’ve been seeing is since late March, because of the starvation, the
declaration of ethnic cleansing as an official aim, it’s not just
genocide scholars — there seems to be a broader and broader agreement
with legal scholars that we are seeing [genocide],” said Lederman, who
recalled that he personally reached a similar conclusion in the spring
of 2024.
“The
bottom line is, there is a reason why so many people in this field of
study agree. It’s very hard to be a genocide scholar and not say it’s a
genocide,” he said.