[Salon] US fuels brain drain to China with Trump’s anti-science ‘Cultural Revolution’



US fuels brain drain to China with Trump’s anti-science ‘Cultural Revolution’

Chinese-American researchers are finding similarities with chaotic period under Mao Zedong that targeted intellectuals in China

SCMP
As the Donald Trump administration slashes research funding and brings institutes under broader political control, some Chinese-American scientists are drawing parallels with China’s Cultural Revolution. Photo: AFP
Ling Xinin Ohio
Updated: 23 Oct 2025
Political purges, funding cuts and a growing hostility towards expertise have unsettled the US research community, evoking memories among Chinese-Americans of a dark chapter in Chinese history and prompting some to look to China for stability.
The Cultural Revolution, launched by Mao Zedong in 1966 to eliminate “bourgeois” influence and consolidate his power, plunged China into turmoil. Factories and schools were shut down while scholars were denounced and exiled for “re-education”.

The upheaval continued for a decade, crippling China’s science and education sectors as well as its economy, leaving scars that lasted for generations. Chinese-American scientists have independently noted similarities with the United States under President Donald Trump.

In an interview with the South China Morning Post, top mathematician Shing-Tung Yau said a US professor had recently told him that “the American academic community is basically experiencing havoc like China’s Cultural Revolution”.

A number of Chinese-American researchers interviewed by the Post shared the same impression, describing their careers as “chaotic” and the path forward as looking increasingly uncertain.

Why are more Chinese scientists leaving the US to return to China?

Among them was a biologist, based in the American Midwest, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution. Aged in his late 50s, he said that he had once planned to stay in the US until retirement.

According to the biologist, during Trump’s first term, he endured years of suspicion under the China Initiative, which targeted Chinese-American scholars, and also faced harassment fuelled by baseless claims about the origins of Covid-19.

“Now it’s utter madness,” he said, adding that one of his approved research proposals was recently rescinded after a federal review flagged terminology related to emerging vaccine technologies. “I’m looking for opportunities to go back to China next year.”

The White House moved to downsize the nation’s research establishment earlier this year, with its proposal to “eliminate waste” by slashing budgets at major science agencies and merging long-standing institutes under broader political control.

In recent weeks, there have been large-scale lay-offs spanning a range of disciplines, from about 4,000 scientists at Nasa to hundreds of employees at the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

During China’s Cultural Revolution, intellectuals were branded as enemies of the people – the “stinking ninth class” – under the slogan “the more you know, the more subversive you are”.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences, the country’s largest research organisation and today the biggest in the world, was reduced during the turmoil from more than 100 institutes to fewer than 10.

Fang Shimin, a China-born researcher-turned-critic now living in the US, wrote on social media that the “new Trump-era Cultural Revolution”, like the Chinese experience, placed political loyalty above expertise.

He cited an October 2 report in the journal Science that said four directors from the National Institutes of Health were collectively fired, stripped of tenure and had their laboratories shut down.

“These academic positions will all have to be filled by laymen loyal to Trump, to faithfully execute the great leader’s instructions to destroy American scientific research,” Fang wrote.

Denis Simon, a visiting professor at Duke University’s Asian/Pacific Studies Institute, echoed Fang’s view, saying that he had seen expertise being discarded in favour of political loyalty.

“The message is: don’t trust intellectuals,” Simon said. “The demise of value for true expertise is where the US is shooting itself in the foot.”

However, the US had not seen the violence of China’s Cultural Revolution, he noted. Professors in China at the time were publicly humiliated, forced to wear dunce caps and paraded through the streets. Many ended up taking their own lives.

“China was extreme and radical during the Cultural Revolution,” Simon said. “While the US is broken, it’s not broken like that. The better comparison, I think, is that while the US is moving backwards, China is moving forwards.”

The Cultural Revolution left China’s scientific enterprise in ruins. An entire generation of scientists missed the chance to train and the isolation from the world’s scientific community set Chinese research back by decades.

Analysts said the US could face a similar loss of talent if current trends continued. According to Simon, the uncertainty has already disrupted projects and teams, driving foreign-born and some American scientists abroad, where funding is more stable.

In the long run, such disruption would be likely to inflict “irreparable damage” on the US research and development system, he said.

Passionate about science? Dive deeper with the Dark Matters newsletter, a weekly in-depth analysis on China’s rise in science, technology and military that goes beneath the surface. Sign up for free now.
Ling Xin
Ling Xin is a science journalist based in Ohio. She mainly covers physics, astronomy and space. Her writing has appeared in Science, Scientific American, MIT Technology Review and other English and Chinese outlets. She was a visiting journalist at Science magazine in Washington,


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.