Epstein, Israel, and the architecture of impunity
New Epstein files have fuelled Israel spy theories, but verified ties to Ehud Barak is what we should be paying close attention to, writes Hossam el-Hamalawy.
The latest release of court documents connected to Jeffrey Epstein has revived familiar speculation about shadowy intelligence operations, particularly involving Israel. Online commentary has seized on a 2020 FBI Confidential Human Source report to claim Epstein was a foreign spy, trained and deployed through Israeli channels.
A careful reading of both the document and the wider evidentiary record tells a far more revealing story, one less about espionage fantasies and far more about how global elites operate beyond meaningful accountability.
At the centre of the verified Israeli connection stands Ehud Barak, former prime minister and defence minister. Unlike the swirling rumours that dominate social media, Barak’s relationship with Epstein is extensively documented. Court records, published emails, and Barak’s own public admissions confirm that he visited Epstein’s properties repeatedly well after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting minors.
These were not casual encounters. The two maintained ongoing contact throughout the 2010s. Epstein also invested in ventures connected to Barak, particularly in technology firms operating in areas where private capital increasingly overlaps with national security, data extraction, and surveillance economies. That alone should alarm any society that claims to take democratic accountability seriously.
A convicted sex offender, notorious by then across international media, continued to socialise with and financially back a former head of government. This was not a failure of information. It was a failure of elite norms.
Another long-standing figure in Epstein’s orbit was Alan Dershowitz, who served as part of Epstein’s legal defence team during the 2008 Florida case and maintained contact with him for years afterwards. Known for his fiercely ideological, near-unconditional defence of Israel and its most hardline policies—for instance, saying killing innocent civilians in Gaza might be necessary as part of a cost-benefit analysis for Israel—Dershowitz brought not only legal muscle but enormous political influence into Epstein’s circle.
He has acknowledged knowing Epstein closely while vehemently denying allegations brought against him by one of Epstein’s accusers, a claim later withdrawn as part of a settlement.
Court records and investigative reporting nonetheless confirm that Dershowitz remained deeply embedded in Epstein’s post-conviction world, moving within the same elite social and political circles that continued to shield Epstein from full accountability. His role illustrates how legal power, celebrity status, and ideological networks functioned as protective armour around Epstein long after his crimes were publicly known.
Barak has insisted he was unaware of the extent of Epstein’s crimes. Yet, by the time many of their meetings occurred, Epstein’s conviction and the nature of the allegations against him were public knowledge. The willingness to overlook that reality speaks volumes about how power operates within transnational elite circles.
This is where the recently circulated FBI document enters the conversation. In the report, a single confidential source alleges that Epstein belonged to “US and allied intelligence services”, was trained as a spy under Barak, and that Israeli intelligence debriefed Dershowitz after their communications. These claims appear as an unverified source narrative, not investigative conclusions.
The same source proceeds to make sweeping accusations about Russian influence operations, Kushner family corruption, covert foreign lobbying, technology theft, and even broad claims that Donald Trump was “compromised by Israel”, again without supporting evidence inside the document itself. This is not proof. It is raw intelligence intake.
Law enforcement agencies routinely document such allegations precisely because some tips eventually bear fruit while many collapse under scrutiny. Treating every recorded source belief as established fact misunderstands how intelligence work functions and invites misinformation.
What matters is what can be corroborated. And what can be corroborated is already deeply disturbing without invoking spy thrillers.
Epstein was not simply a wealthy socialite who fell into scandal. He functioned as a broker of elite access. His homes were hubs where politicians, billionaires, royalty, academics, and corporate executives intersected. His money lubricated relationships. His connections created dependency. This is the political economy of late capitalism in its purest form.
Power no longer sits neatly within state institutions. It flows through private wealth networks that cross borders effortlessly, insulated by legal complexity and social privilege. Epstein was one node in this architecture, albeit an unusually grotesque one.
The relationship with Barak fits seamlessly into this structure. It demonstrates how former heads of state move within global capital circuits where criminality becomes tolerable if the benefits are large enough and the social circle elite enough.
The Israeli dimension of the Epstein story is therefore not about proving some clandestine intelligence operation. It is about how political power in Israel, like elsewhere, is entangled with transnational financial elites who operate beyond democratic scrutiny.
Beyond Barak, there is no verified evidence tying other Israeli officials to Epstein through concrete documentation in the released materials. The espionage narrative rests entirely on uncorroborated informant claims such as those in the FBI report. Conflating those allegations with the very real, documented Barak relationship only obscures the deeper structural issue: elite impunity.
Epstein continued to move freely among the world’s powerful long after his conviction. Institutions failed not because they lacked information, but because confronting wealth and influence is structurally discouraged within capitalist systems built around privilege.
The scandal is not that intelligence agencies might have been interested in Epstein. Of course they were. Anyone with his access would attract attention. The scandal is that political leaders, corporate executives, and social elites continued to embrace him anyway.
What the Epstein files ultimately expose is a global ruling class that operates by different rules, protected by money, legal firewalls, and mutual silence. In that world, criminal behaviour is inconvenient but not disqualifying.
The fixation on spy conspiracies risks missing the far more uncomfortable truth: Epstein did not need to be an intelligence asset to wield extraordinary power. Capital alone was sufficient.
The confirmed relationship between Epstein and a former Israeli prime minister already reveals how far elite networks stretch and how little moral restraint governs them. That should be the focus of public outrage and serious investigation. Not the fantasy of hidden puppet masters, but the reality of a system where wealth routinely overrides accountability.
Hossam el-Hamalawy is an Egyptian scholar-activist in Germany, focusing on the military, policing, and labour.
Follow Hossam on X: @3arabawy
Have questions or comments? Email us at editorial-english@newarab.com
Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The New Arab.