Democrats in the US Senate do not seem to be intended to transfer resources to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and end the partial budget cut, despite the fact that the US has intensified the war with Iran and increasing the pressure of the Republicans in this direction.
Little progress has been made in recent weeks in talks between the White House and Democratic negotiators.
Republicans tried to clear the blockage this week by arguing that the conflict was increasing domestic threats and pointing to the role of the DHS in the fight against internal security and terrorism.
Democrats insist on immigration reform
Democrats, including many of those who voted to end the government shutdown in November, are not convinced of these arguments.
Senator Tim Kaine stated that Republicans provided enough resources to the DHS in previous budget arrangements. "We will not give up our necessary reform demands in an instant," Kaine said.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise summarized the opinion of the Republicans in a statement on the social media platform X at the weekend.
"After successful operations against Iran and the FBI's growing threat warnings in the country, it is dangerous for Democrats in Washington to keep the Homeland Security Department shut down," Scalise said.
At least four of the eight Democrats who left the party administration in the deal that ended the 43-day government shutdown last fall reported they saw no reason to change their attitude due to the situation in Iran.
Senator Angus King told The Hill newspaper that he did not see a connection between the budget struggle and the war that sprouted in Tehran.
Referring to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Coast Guard Agency, King said, "I don't think there is any relationship between the FEMA and Iran or the Coast Guard in this context."
Only one Democrat supports the DHS budget
Senator John Fetterman was the only one to support the DHS budget among the eight people in question. Fetterman is already known as the only Democrat who voted to advance a full-year DHS budget bill.
Negotiators agreed to pass the five-year budget bill and exclude the DHS after federal immigration officers killed Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.
Since then, it has been difficult to close the great gap between the parties. Democrats demand radical reforms in the way the administration enforces immigration laws.
The distance between the parties is maintained in the negotiations
While the White House and Democrats continue to make mutual offers, management officials conveyed their final bids to Democratic leaders last weekend.
The Democrats' chief negotiator and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the parties are still far from each other but negotiations on paper are ongoing.
Schumer said, "It is very easy for them to get the ministry's budget. It is enough for them to accept our reasonable offers on ICE and Border Patrol. What we want is the practices of every police organization," he said.
Republicans reject Democrats' demands
Democrats are constantly pointing to initial demand lists in negotiations, while Republicans complain that Democrats don't make enough concessions.
Schumer and House of Representatives Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries demanded that the search order requirements for immigration operations be tightened, the implementation of "roaming patrol" be ended, and immigration officers on the ground be open and act like other national and local law enforcement agencies. All these demands are seen as insurmoundable limits for Republicans.
The offer of partial approval of the budget was rejected
The blockage led to attempts by some names in the Republican wing to mobilize the talks. Katie Britt, a member of the Senate Allocation Commission, said she started informal talks with some Democrats to find a possible solution.
Many Democratic MPs called for a step to be taken, reminiscent of the agreement reached before the budget deadline.
This proposal provides for the approval of the budget of the part of the DHS, which is not related to immigration and accounts for about 80 percent. Units such as FEMA, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Coast Guard Organization and Secret Service fall within this scope.
While Kaine expressed that they are ready to take a step in this direction, it was stated that the Republicans did not welcome this proposal. Katie Britt responded negatively to the question of whether she would support such a bill.
The war powers bill will be put to the vote
Discussions on the DHS budget take place ahead of critical voting on the war powers bill presented by Kaine.
Although the measure seems likely to fail, Democrats consider it as an important debate about whether President Trump's actions against Iran are legal.
While Republicans are expected to side with the bill, key names indicated that they would not deviate from the party line. Senator Josh Hawley announced that the administration would vote "no" on Monday due to the official notification to Congress and the lack of use of a black union in the Middle East country.
Senator Todd Young, on the other hand, stated that although it was reported that the White House and the Republican Party had criticized the way the situation was managed behind closed doors, he was inclined to oppose the bill.
While the administration announced that military operations against the Iranians are expected to last about another month, Republican lawmakers said they hope the conflict would end as soon as possible. Trump, on the other hand, emphasized that "whatever is necessary" will be done to complete the mission.