‘Preparatory work’ on pipeline, believed to be the Power of Siberia 2, included in five-year plan – but analysts say more details are needed
However, some analysts said a completion date remained distant in the absence of public agreement between Beijing and Moscow on certain details.
The draft version of the country’s development blueprint for 2026 to 2030, released last week during the annual session of China’s top legislature, did not elaborate further.
Aleksei Chigadaev, an associate fellow at New Eurasian Strategies Centre, said several issues needed resolving before work on the whole pipeline could kick off, including the exact stakes of Russia’s Gazprom and China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), the two state-owned energy giants spearheading the project.
Also, questions remained over who would pay for the construction and what price would be agreed for the gas sent through the pipeline, he added.
“It is a very long, capital-intensive project that will take many years to complete,” Chigadaev said.
The Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, which would span 2,600km (1,615 miles) and was previously valued at US$13.6 billion, has been put on hold multiple times since discussions began in 2006.
Mongolia’s Minister of Industry and Mineral Resources Gongor Damdinnyam met representatives of CNPC during his visit to China in January, and both parties pledged to “intensify cooperation” on a Russian gas pipeline transiting Mongolia, though the project was not named directly.
Munkhnaran Bayarlkhagva, a former official at the National Security Council of Mongolia, said that negotiations among the three countries about the Mongolian section of the pipeline would not happen in isolation from the rest of the work on the Power of Siberia 2.
It can thus be assumed that “Gazprom has finally given up on ‘monopolising’ the Mongolia section of the pipeline,” he explained, meaning China and Russia might share costs as well as benefits. This could mean including Chinese entities in construction, engineering companies and financing.
“What we do not know is the price,” Bayarlkhagva said.
“But if indeed the Chinese side is prepping to get involved in the groundwork, then it is safe to assume that ‘ice has cracked’, and there is movement and momentum in the direction of a final agreement.”