Washington’s pressure campaign on Iran shows limited results as risks of escalation grow, while new talks proposed by Pakistan signal a potential diplomatic path forward.
Washington appears to be facing diminishing strategic options in its confrontation with Iran, as diplomatic efforts tentatively resume amid warnings that military and economic pressure have failed to achieve their stated objectives.
According to the Financial Times, the United States' naval embargo is aimed at restricting Iran’s oil exports in a bid to curb its defense financing. However, such a move risks destabilizing global energy markets and driving up oil prices, while also threatening a fragile two-week ceasefire reached between Washington and Tehran. US President Donald Trump confirmed the approach, stating that Washington is pursuing “a complete blockade” to prevent Iran from selling oil. He compared the strategy to US actions in Venezuela, saying, “You saw what we did with Venezuela. It’ll be something very similar to that, but at a higher level.”
Despite these threats, skepticism persists among analysts. Iran Expert Vali Nasr told FT that such measures may have a limited immediate impact on Iran, arguing that Tehran could instead leverage global chokepoints to increase pressure on the international economy.
From the outset of the conflict, Iran has framed the confrontation as an existential battle, with a strategic objective of raising costs for the United States and the global economy, according to the same report.
Read more: IRGC signals force posture upgrade and hidden operational assets
Meanwhile, on the nuclear issue, an analysis published by Foreign Affairs indicates that Washington’s longstanding strategy of forcing Iran to abandon its nuclear program through economic pressure and military action has repeatedly failed.
Although recent strikes have inflicted damage, they have not eliminated Iran’s nuclear expertise or its ability to rebuild. The report notes that the political consequences of the conflict may outweigh the technical setbacks, as the war could reinforce Tehran’s need to retain a future nuclear deterrent.
In parallel, Chatham House assessed that a negotiated agreement could offer Washington and Trump a politically viable exit from the crisis. It added that US efforts to portray limited battlefield gains as strategic success reflect a desire to de-escalate tensions.
Diplomatic momentum appears to be building in that direction. According to the Associated Press, Pakistan has proposed hosting a second round of talks between the United States and Iran in Islamabad in the coming days, ahead of the ceasefire’s expiration.
Officials cited by the agency emphasized that the initial round of negotiations, despite ending without an agreement, was part of an ongoing diplomatic process rather than a one-off effort.