[Salon] Republicans Have a Huge Gap in Ad Spending, But Does It matter? (10/19/26)




Republicans Have a Huge Gap in Ad Spending, But Does It matter?

The Republican cash edge is entirely in the Senate. The House is a lost cause.

The Ad Spending Gap

The New York Times reports That Huge Republican Cash Edge? It’s in Senate Races, Not House Races.

Republicans have an enormous financial edge in this year’s midterms. But with two weeks until the election, it is now clear that their spending advantage is overwhelmingly playing out only in the advertising battle for the Senate — not the House.

In the seven Senate races that the Cook Political Report rated as tossups, Republicans are outspending Democrats on advertising by $947 million to $625 million. That is a breathtaking advantage of more than $320 million in the key races that could determine which party wins control of the Senate, according to a tally by AdImpact of ads that have been already been shown and future reservations.

It is a very different story in the House, though. Republicans still have an advertising advantage in the closest House races, but it is relatively narrow — just a $14 million edge across the 21 races rated as tossups.

There are a number of explanations for the discrepancy.

Senate races generally attract more money and attention than congressional contests. Elon Musk’s enormous spending on the Texas Senate race is also a factor: He gave nearly $170 million to super PACs backing Ken Paxton, the Republican Senate nominee there — a huge injection of cash from one person.

But it is also appears to be an indication that both parties — and their donors — are viewing it as increasingly unlikely that Republicans will be able to hold onto their House majority. The battle to win control of the Senate, though, remains on a knife’s edge. Republican donors are accordingly spending big in key Senate races.

In six of the seven tossup Senate races, Republican ad spending is far outstripping Democrats’. The biggest gap is in Texas ($141 million), but there are chasms also in Ohio (nearly $90 million), Maine (nearly $32 million) and Michigan ($33 million).

Only in Kansas — where Republicans are engaged in a late rescue mission — is the spending even close. There, Democrats had an edge of less than $2 million.

“We came into this cycle preparing for the worst-case scenario in Republican spending, and planned accordingly,” said CJ Warnke, a spokesman for the House Majority PAC, the biggest super PAC for House Democrats. “While we’re fighting deep into Trump territory, the G.O.P. spending advantage will ultimately leave some winnable seats on the table.”

These ratings are fluid. Cook has moved numerous races into the Democratic direction in recent weeks.

Dollars spent do not directly equal ads aired. Candidates are entitled to cheaper TV rates than super PACs are under federal law. Democrats are generally spending more on ads at that cheaper rate because Democratic candidates for both the House and the Senate are raising far more than Republican candidates. Republican groups, though, have a big advantage over Democratic ones, led by Mr. Trump’s allied super PACs and Mr. Musk’s wallet.

Julie Merz, the executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, predicted that Democrats would win the majority, saying in a statement that they were working to “maximize every dollar and compete with Republicans and their dark-money backers.”

Democrat Candidates Crush Republican Counterparts 

Every major Senate Democratic candidate is crushing their Republican counterparts in fund-raising.

But Musk has plowed hundreds of millions of dollars into Republican efforts giving Republicans a huge edge.

Which Party Will Control the Senate?

Does Republican spending matter? Is it enough? 

For all that spending, there has been no discernable movement in odds.

Polymarket Odds

  • September 19, 2026: Democrats 61 Percent
  • October 19, 2026: Democrats 65 percent

In the period between Sep 19 and Oct 19 the Democrat low was 61 percent and the high 68 percent. 

Nate Silver Deluxe Senate Projection

On September 18, the Nate Silver Senate Deluxe model gave Democrats a 59.8 percent chance of winning. 

Silver was still calling this a tossup. I wasn’t. 

On the 19th a new batch of polls were in favor of Democrats and the odds for Democrats never fell below 65 percent again. 

On October 5, Silver hut 73 percent for Democrats and never dropped below that number since. 

Are Republicans Spending Enough Money?

I went down the rabbit hole to find out what was happening to hundreds of billions of dollars of extra Republican spending. Curiously, I encountered the Red Queen who was in competition with Alice to see who could throw the most money into the air. 

The Red Queen had bigger cash pile from which to throw, and Alice was struggling to keep up. 

But no matter how much money the Red Queen tossed to the wind, the there was no discernable impact on the votes the queen hoped to buy. A Cheshire Cat was in a nearby tree keeping score of money tossed and the polling results, grinning at the spectacle.

“Now, here, you see, it takes all the spending you can do, to keep in the same place,” said the Red Queen to Alice.

As I walked out of the rabbit hole, I couldn’t help but reflect on how much the Red queen looked like Elon Musk. 

Related Posts

October 15, 2026: Who Is Favored to Win the Senate in 6 Different Models

Here are 10 Senate races in 6 models, one of them mine.

October 16, 2026: Elon Musk Gave $158 Million to Paxton’s Campaign? Will It Help?

Musk gave the money to Super-PACs which immediately gave it all to Paxton.

October 16, 2026: Trump Has a 91% Disapproval Rating from Voters Under 30 on Inflation

“The worst I have ever seen in any poll, on any issue for any president”



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.